1954-06-24 — Page 10

DRYSDALE & CO., LTD.

CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS.

ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CO. LTD. H.K. & Shanghai Bank Bldg. Tel. 97789

JOHN CLARKE'S

CASEBOOK

CHINA MAIL

THURSDAY, JUNE 24, 1954. -

Judgment For $22 Million

The Old CLAIM

Soldier

DWARD might have

EDWA

stepped straight out of one of those faded, yellow- ing photographs that hang, heavily framed, in dark corners of the sergeants' meas, and show old soldiers of another age.

His buck was straight, lo chest flung out, and his hend held high; and on his upper lip disciplined was

moustache with wax until i had become more a symbol of authority th a mere adornment to his face

#

"Guilty, sir,“ he said,

B

clicked his heels, where he stood. In the dock of the Mari borough Street court.

He was charged with stealing

a dish-cloth and some scrups of fond,

THE FACTS

WWHAT

W asked

arc

1

Mr und

Wüs

fucks" tewlaayf

ul

Thoman

stared Edward as it puzzled by what he saw.

Indeed,

chMeul to match the paltry crine with the man in the dock, about whom everything suggested that while to others he might be a mar- tinet, he would set the highest standards for himself.

"He

into

wishes these to be taken consideration.

sald

sir,"

the police officer. passing a document towards the bench.

"You want me to take consideration

your

AGAINST BELGIAN SIDE GLANCES By Galbraith

BANK UPHELD BY

ACTING PUISNE

JUDGE

Judgment, with costs, was awarded the China Mutual Trading Co., Ltd. 13-27 Ice House Street in their claim for HK$2,590,171.96 against Banque Belge Poul L'Etranger, Edinburgh House, by the Acting Puisne Judge, Mr Justice J. Reynolds in the Supreme Court this morning.

Plaintiffs claimed from Banque Belge the return (with interest) of HK$2,590,171.96 being the balance of margins paid in connection with the importation of certain goods into Hongkong.

Alternatively they claimed the equivalent in Hongkong dollars of US$449,504.43, or damages.

The Defence was that the margins, at the request of the plaintiffs, had been converted into US dollars and that they were held by the defendants in US dollars in the United States. As a result of the freezing regulations passed in December, 1950, the monies had become blocked. They

were paid to

plaintiffs' account, which was consequently blocked, it was maintained.

Mr John

dollar McNeill, QC, Mr | The US and Mr Brook A. Percy Cheni Bernacchi, all instructed by Mr 3. it. Chan, of Messa Lau. Chan and Ko. appated for plantiffs.

The defendants

were repre-

sented by the Hun Leo d'Almada, QC, and Mr D. A. 1. Weight

fat present way cm neb lay) both instructed by Mr P. A. 1. Vine.

Mesars of Deacons

His Tandship

11

the

helf that even

be under the

plaintiffs Cusc dricted to a clatt

these

exchange contracts, came within the provisions of section 3 of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Ordin-

ance and the plaintiffs were recover thereunder HK$2,500,171.80

the

claimed

Lentitled to Into stealing. between January and June of this

year 22 dish cloths.

forks,

sugar aliters, knives,

two

spoons, to a total value of £4?" "Sir," said Edward, and click-

ed his heels again.

50 YEARS AGO

CLL me about him,”

the magistrale,

PELL

sigh.

Briefly,

salei

with

chat-

the policeman lined Edward's life history. Be had joined the Army

50 years #go, left when his time was up, and became a railway purler. served in the 1914-18 war, then return

to his

portering. In 1940 he left the railways to become porter in a restaurant.

it was from the restaurant he had stolen.

"He was stopped As he left work." suld the officer.

"The one cloth and the scraps of food were In his pockets. When he was stopped, he saket. 'Aren't I silly, with a record like

mine, and me an Old Con- temptible ៩០០,'

other when we

The

property was found visited the single room in which with his wife. They

be lives

£2 s. 6d, a week for the pay room, and his wages were £3 10. a week and some meats. He has lost the job, of course,"

"What do you want to say?" Mr Thomas asked Edward.

"Sorry, sir" said Edward, at attention. "My first conviction, sic."

"Here

you are," étl the magistrate, "you live a good ilfe, serve your country well, and then you throw everything away.'

He sent Edward away to be interviewed by Mr Charles Morgan, the probation offer.

you

HARSHEST JUDGE

WHEN Edward came back. Mr

מו

Morgan went into the wit- ness-box.

"This man has exceptional record since schooldaya," he said.

his

い

THE JUDGMENT

or

The judgment read in part: The plainūtes are a thrited Com pany incorporated Bad having it

egistered office in Ifongkong. The defendants per P Company Incur- porated under the laws of Belgium and having a registered office in Hongkung "Neither party has kad of runteríal timek, an offer Dr place of bustness in the United States of Asterion. The plaintiffe are importers of foreign goods. The defects are a back

From time to time between the November, ut July 192 1930, the defendants at the request

the platestif

BUCE certain revocable letters of credit without

VSCOUTSE

תוf !!!

The

were

been equivalent of the; havo

theposited

tile with and margin and that the verbal agree-❘ defendants

thenceforth men made was to this effect

hek by them in their account with On January P. 1031, the United their New York agents? I consider Slates Government. pursuant to that rights of the plants are those powere conferred by the Forelgas

which ordinarily arise oui of the Amels Control Regulation Irone relationship of banker and customer the defendants' account with their

where the lotter has made a deposit New York. Thereafter with the former. the

disclosed That defendants U83449.304.43. a part of such account, I was held a margins for the piled31- Liftm

BANKER & CUSTOMER The legal relation of a banker and customer in their ordinary dealings tr money is simply that of debtor On February 6, 1951, all the usaeta of the plamtiffs with their New and creditor. ፡፡ the customer

deposits money, he is tho creditor Yurk agents in the United States of

and the amulet deposited can to America were blocked by crdes ut

recovered in an action for matoy At the the United States Treasury defendants' request, the defendants' lent, so deposit creating a compon

Tre money

depualled agents in New York applied for and law debt, 10 obtained

the the permission of

be the money of the United States Treasury to place the

customer. It is the money of the banker who is bound to return an of US$449,004.43 in a blocked account adrendy

In the equivalent by paying a sum equal existing

to debit the

I that deposited with him. To all intus name and defendants' Cont with

intents. it in the money Aitke amo

The Berount remained banker to do with se ho may please.

There blocked and the plaints were

is no privity of contract able to oblaty payment wat of the between the customer of the bank US$449,504.43 (or any part thereof)

and that bank's correrpandent else. lodged therein by the defendants.

sad therefore those la no defendantı The

refused to pay

the plaintiff and the defendanta HK$2,500,172.00 to the plainuss

New York agent Betiere the present action was with regard to the suma, the subject brought, all the latters of credit, in} matter of this action.

am

Wity between

at the

| respret if which the

A debt MATKINS

ettuale or

ipcatleed totalling X$3,500.171.06 had been where It la recoverable. A debt pattl, had expired without drafia which arises out of the relationship of banker and customer in localised being drawn against them.

The plaintiffs in this action claim #1 the branch of the bank where repayment ol 13K$2.590.171.16 pald; the account is kept. to the defendants, or alternatively The debt In Question disclosure. The defendants pleaded

branch of discharge of their obligations by performance of the contracts of alternatively that they were excused performance by reason of Import- bility due to supervening legality. F/E CONTRACTS

defendana.

5-14

"That's what I call real advancement-he's got the control of a big league pitcher?"

Alleged. Theft Of

Documents: Court Rejects Man's Application

Allegations of theft against a solicitor of the Supreme was con- Court were made by a Hongkong merchant, Albert Francis damages for the alleged wrongfulted in Hongkong by the Hong Bailey, when he applied to the Full Court this morning to The defendants have no branch in order the Commissioner of Police to take immediate steps the United States of America. The plaints are a Hongkong conne

to recover two documents connected with a civil case and whose registered office 1 in Kong The debt is not

an appeal. recoverable

at very

It

with Mr Tong and the relationship between the forward exenange can. insels and the letters of credit. The defendants sought to cambiish that: 1-The forward exchange con- tracks made between the plainti and defendantis effected an actual male of U.S. dollara by the defen- dants to the plaintiffs,

of

ge

Sheaffer's SNORKEL"

CARNARVON HOTEL INCIDENT

CROWN BRINGS CONTEMPT OF COURT ACTION

A sequel to the barricading of the Carnarvon Hotel from the inside on the evening of June 14, when Bailiffs and Policemen were locked out and hotel guests locked in for over four hours, was an action brought by the Crown before the Full Court this morning for alleged contempt of Court. Submitting that the action of those respon- sible was "a criminal contempt of this Court", Mr W. A. Blair-Kerr, Senior Crown Counsel, declared that it must have been abundantly plain to them that night that the process of the Court was being deliberately flouted."

the Acting Chief Justice, Mr arrived, Including Mr Clunie Justice T. J. Gould, and the and two Divisional Superinten-

·Pulsne Judge. Mr Justice C. W. dents,

on many

Recco, granted the application Mo was spoken to by Mr Blair-Kerr for writs of occasions, and he was sald to attachment against three de-be completely adamant and fendantą. Tong Chuen-yip, Moeven disrespectful, It

Was King-tong and Cheng Tick- alleged that he had declared: fung.

...you think you can scare The Court made an order that me with those papers (the writ) the writs be

returnable on 10

DOOR OPENED

a.m. on July 8,

The Crown based its applica- Eventually. * representative tion on the grounds that the of Johnson, Stokes and Master, three defendants, knowing that solicitors, went to the hotel to writ of summons, injunction, or gether with the Supreme Court other process issued under the Registrar, Mr d'Almada authority of the Supreme Court son discussion

| zome was about to be served on June Chuen-yip (first defendant), the

door was opened.

14

After

with

Tong

on June 9

on persons named as resid-: Ing at the Carnarvon Hotel, 4 Mr Blair-Kerr sald Tong was and 4A Carnarvon Road (first alleged to be the man who came and third defendants being two with the 30 others of those

ob.

took over and

the those persons) witfully structed Supreme Court Bailiffs force, The summons,

hotel by he went in their und

endeavours to effect on, was then served on the first service of the process by causing and third defendants. all doors and entrances to the "The Crown has thought fit Hotel to be

closed for some to bring this application because four and a half hours.

we feel that there has been a The Crown claimed that the criminal contempt of the Court, behaviour of all three men the crux of the matter being showed a contempt for the pro- that, well knowing that the cess of the Supreme Court and Head Bailift of Court wat out- offlcers of the Court whose duty side the hotel under the direc was to serve a process in action of the Court, with about 50 Folloc officers, it must have been cordance with the law

support of his application, abundantly plain to those people In Mr Blair Kerr referred to cer- that night that the process of tain affidavits on file, the first the Court was deliberately being that of one Leung Kim, a Routed," he asserted. party to an action row pending In the Court.

matter, he

arose in this

on Juno 14.

was

Immediately morning, and the

to

10

rown Counsel went on

that. say in the United States but only in

22 persons were prrest- SEQUEL OF EVENTS Bailey claimed he lost both cases because his solicitors Hongkong. Upon

ed out of the 30 who had forel- The defendants, whu

the letters

The egin, credit expiring, without draft being failed to collect all necessary evidence, and was therefore

went Op

BIT taken possession of the had the right to agyerd

drawn

them. I consider that three witnesses who gave the

writ hotel. They were brought be way: the money deposited considerable defendants became due as a debt to with the

"defrauded" of some $77,000. lenall. The matters chiefly in the the plaintiffs localised in Hongkong.

Ho alleged that the two documents were either stolen by Action No. 210 was taken out foro a Magistrate the following pute between the parties was

Magistrate nature and effect of the forward ·

FIRST DEFENCE

Mr Y. H. Chan, or stolen through his co-operation. He declared

thereafter, Leung Kim applied thought at to have them and exchange contracts as affeeled by The first

to the Puise Judge defence raised by the that he would never obtain justice until the Police helped him

for

the

defendants bound over *greement defendants to the claim that the

in. the subsequent verbal

Leung's various sums to keep the peace. defendants

interim injunction. obligation

recover the documents. under the forward exchange con-

affidavit set out his reasons for

That, he concluded, was the traça to deliver United States

The Injunction, substance of his application dollars sold to the plaintiffs or their

The Full, Court comprising | gence, which does not arise from

applying for nomine in the United States of the Acting Chief Justice, Mr this application.

disclosed that there the Court. Brielly America upon the letters of credit Justice T. 3. Gould, and Puisne There la another remedy

dispute

The application was granted, of fairly long expiring umed. On the view Judge, Mr Justice C. W. Reece,

himself and which the applicant appears to standing take of the evidence, the obligations found that no theft had been

standing between of both pastica under the forward

inking be pursuing the

of various individunis

named in exchange contracts have been com- disclosed on the documents criminal proceedings against Mr the action as defendants. pletely discharged and therefore the placed before them and refused Chan or Mr Sin as the case may Leung's affidavit further dis- CHILDREN question of any subsequent frustra- tion of much contracts cannot prize.

grant Bailey an order man-

open I therefore

damus against the Commissioner be. That remedy

being actively minuting factor was that the ENTERTAINED apparently Is tolia.

The alternative defence is that the

first defendant la the defendant, by paying the U.S.

this two grounds

proceedings, Tong dollara, held by them with their

was also the first de- Court will not grant the appli- when agents in New York, into a blocked

Action cation. Dccoun1 already exalker in the name of the plaintiffs with those

NOT STATUTORY agenta, having discharged their obligations, I consider thất this de- fence aimo falls on the ground that payment by a debtor into a blocked account without the consent of the

whereby the defendants called structed their agents to negotiate evidence US dollar drafts drawn in the maturs up to the aggregate amount spected in each letter of credit and the plaintiffs ogreed to accept on presentation all drafts drawn on ther Uiereunder and

ane on or before maturity

On receipt of each of the lettera of crecht the defendants required the plaintiffs to pay to the defen, dapts in Hongkong the equivalent of between 40 per cent and 30 per cent

of US of the aggregate amount dollers kifiuisted in coch Jetter of Crean, as security against the con- tingency that the plaintiffs would be unble or would fall, to accept or Day the drafte en presentation In Hongkong Between June 23, 1950, and November 19, 1990, the plaintiffi wo paid inter alle kuins Totalling HK$4,590,171 D6, Before the letter? of credit were cutablished certain forward foreign exchange contraels were made in flongkong between the plaintiffs and the defendants.

DEFENCE PLEADINGS

By their pleadings the defendants these contracts were for way that

2.They as a bank were not peg- mitted by the Hongkong Exchange Control legislation "la hold US. deliers in Hongkong.

--It was an impited term in all augh contracta that the U.S. dollars Koid thereunder should be deliver- able only in the United States of Amerion or alternatively that they are only po deliverable by custom or age.

4.The forward exchange contracts were entirely independent of the letter of credit, and in respect of bay U.S. dollars sold (but not uffled under letters of credit) the the defendant position was that bank, if requested by its customer, might, and unssity would, repur? | ot a debt, chase mich U.§. dollars; but that thla repurchase wax a completely new contract into which the bank was not obliged to enter.

hold that this defence

creditor cannot be a good discharge

I therefore hold that the plaintifa are entitled to recover the equivalent in H.K. dullues of the US$140.801,83 deported with the defendants.

If however, I am not correct in

After briefly reviewing the evi- dence of the witnesses eslied to upholding that the U.B.dollars sold port the defendants' contentions, the judgment continued:

HONEST EVIDENCE

under the forward exchange tracts were delivered to the plaintiffs and ro-deposited with the defen

nt Police.

Giving the Court's ruling, Mr Justice Gould said:

to imme-

pursued by the applicant.

On theso

closed that on June 9, the cul-

ת!

Chuc

at the appeared

Over 1,000 children from the The applicant has applied to

No.210 Boys' and Girls' Clubs and the this Court for leave to apply

fendant

Carnarvon alum areas were treated to a for order of mandamus, that the In the third place the applica Hotel with some 30 other per- free cartoon show at King's Commissioner of Police, Hong- tion ales that the Commissioner sons and forcibly took over the Theatre. his morning. kong, be directed

no of Police be directed to take all hotel:

The show. diately take all necessary steps necessary steps to recover docu to recover documents allegedly ments.

Leung reported the matter to local UNA Uonsored by the pilered

Committee, to have been the Polles, but the Police sald was part of the Children Health stolen from the applicant. stolen. The

basis of mandamus it was a civil dispute which did Campaign Week

Programme. In support of his application against any public officer is that not require action on their part, Thirty scouts of the applicant has brought aff-

he has refused davits by himself together with some statutory duty, copies of correspondence be- tween himself end

two

solici tors formerly employed by

him

Crown Counsel went on

of the Central

danie. I will consider the position and copies of letters purporting thy privato 'citizen even though | say that Leung then went to his enter and leave the theatre,

forward delivary by telegraphic transfer of United States dollars to the total amount stipulated in the Jetters of credit. The plaketiffs, however, say thai, while these con- tracts purported to be forward ex- change contracts for the future sale to the plaintiffs by the defendanja of V.B. dollars up to the value of the amounts ailpulated in the letters of credit, no mich nale was in fact Intenzied by the parties, and the co#1 - tracts were for the sole purpose of Oxing les

of exchange between U.B. dollars and H.K dollar in relation to the sume which might become payable by the plaintifTe D the defendants in respect of draria draway under the letters of credit.

On or about July 27, 1950, a verbal Rferment was made with the defendanta

TGE. by # Mir representative of the plaintiffs, The terms of this agreement are also disputed by the partles In the pleatings. The defendants my that at the plaintiffa' request they (the defendants) thereby agreed, thence- forth, to hold U.S. dollar margins In place of the H.K. dollar margins then held against the lettore of crodit and that, in agreement. the usuance of this | buyers or their nominees. I do not contracts in Hongkong law for these was supposed, as his solicitor

allowed The plaintiffs to of 11.K.

the amount held by the defendants au margins, in part pers formance of the forward excimage contracts and thereby to becoming entitled to United States dollars of equivalent value at the raies of exelange fixed by the relevant forward exchango contracts, deliver

the

The

--

Month Without The Option

Cheung

Wing.

their argument submitted that the solicitor, and upon the conclu- nlfeant has ofber remedies which they disclosed that at AD"junk master, was sentenced to

0

22-year-old that day four weeks' hard labour without to the Carnar

pro and to

out to carry

anda and the and that no breach of the peace District

‚ number · of women police constables werd Court is not aware of any such had been committed.

to on hand to amist the children duty to recover documents for

he I consider that the evidence of the on the motion that the delen-

alleges they have been solicitors, and this interim in- to have been written by him stolen. The witnesses called was honestly given. dants sole obligation in the master to the Police to which he says

Court

therefore Junction was consequently made Its particular I accept the evidence was to deliver the U.S. dollars to

refuses

this application on this on June 14. of Mr Stewart as being fair and the plaintif or his nominee upon

he has received no reply.

HOTEL INCIDENT unblamed and where his evidence the expiry unused of the latters of

ground also," conflicts with the evidence of either credit and that such delivery be

The basis of the applicant's Mr Justice Recce added: "On Turning to affidavits made bý of the other witnesses, I accept his came Imporible by reason of cer- complaint is that he claims, the affidavits Aled for this Mr H. J. M. Vanthali (Chief evidence as being more reliable, tain provisions of the United States though I think not on oath, fo

perfectly clear Baillff, Supreme Court), and Mr Court It seems On the evidence, I consider inst Foreign Assets Control Regulations. R

the forward

have handed two exchange contracte

particular that this application is com- Bryn Jones, Mr Blair-Kerr sald PROPER LAW effected in actual sale of UB.

The ap that apletely misconceived. dollars by the dependants to

defendants on this umb of original letters to Mr Sin, "He says

plaintiffs. nisa consider that that the food he took was for

generally

forward - in

exchange

proper law of the forward exchange slon of the case he undertook he should exhaust before he at- they contracts it la implied by custom or what the law of the place un appeal for which he Instruct tempts to ask this Court to use his dog, and the other things

von Hotel, Before going there, the option by Mr. W. H. K. usage that delivery

with which the contracts have their

Collings at the Marina Court of the 11.8. were to use at home. He 'really

doiler said thereunder is to be in most substantial connection, namely ed Mr Chan, a solicitor. Thes a process the purpose of which they thought it to

call at the this morning for conveying has a splendid record."

the United States of Amerion to the

the United States of America. This applicant alleges that Mr Chan can never be justified."

Taimahatsul Police Station, and women for the purpose of pro- plaintiffe argued that the law of the "That's going to stand him In

requested an inspector of Police tution. however, consider that the custom

to take over all documents from!

and three constables to accom- stend good

now," sold the magi

Cheung was arrested pester- de unge alleged has been establish-

At material Umes both parties Mr Sin, but he exhibits cor #trate. He turned to Edward.

pany them to the hotel, Loung day when he was proceeding of transetion now under considera resided in Hongkong;

with

them, Kim wes

for the from Ngautnokok towards to discharge you

defendant Bank has its respondence in which Mr Chan tion.

I am satisflad, that Mr Tseng, on

In Hongkong and had no indicates ho did not receive the. ha

6 pana Time Signet and Programme purpose of pointing out the camer moored at Kuntong he said. "Go

behalf of the plaintiffs, requested branch In Use. United States of two particular original letters Summary: 101, Azz Hair Hour pres

various persons connected with with seven, well-dressed women straight from now on, you must

the defendants, and that the de "America: build up your good name again."

accounta between

his action. According to Loung's on board. the in question. On that basis themented by Ropiry Day (Boudio): 130, Tendinita pered to hold in the parties, were kept in Hongkong; and oppiicant says it was Mr Chan's mo for Music-The London Light Portuguese Half Hour (Bludio); "Sir" said Edward,

affidavit, he was pushed away contracts were made in turned

dollars sold under the forward Hongkong and could be made pub-duty to acquire these letters. Concert Orch, cond. by Hotwel smartly to his right, and left,

from the iron grill entrance to change contrazis M the margine

Krey (BBCTS); 7:30, “Downs M_mary

hotel by King-tong the saw him later leave the court,

Lane praeppied...) witch the defendants were entitled fees to the of Hongkong and

Alleen Woods the Hongkong Bes change Control Regulations. head up stil, eyes strictly to

Weather Report: If his right, and this Court (tudia the front, on his way, I felt to

gase of Boissevain V. Well Cista subjet, he has, no doubt, London 12 or Species

defendants relled upon the say nothing on this particulare Blane od Worldan Vaun face his severest critic, tha

K3. 482 and in particular upo remedy in the civil law. harshest judge himself, when

peerage in the judgment of Denning plone.

Lala at page 450.

'יי

Sharks In Junk Bay Two sharks, between six and eight foot long, wore seen by the - ship's- company of IMS Consort

this morning in Junk Bay,

the

HMT Empire: Trooper arrived here this morning" from United Kingdom with replace ment froops for Hongkong, The trooper will turn around here.

dollar,

able by telegraphic traunter in the - United States of Americe, nubject to the defendants" right to hold these United States dollars

security.

od in respect of the specific kind

United States of America the US.

to require under the various ister

of credit opened' by the deferidante on behalf of the plaintife and KERE 10 DUTSUZNDO of this

reasons:

2--Thie

branch

SA

The

in particular,

CIVIL LAW: BEMEDY

Radio Hongkong

ILK.T.

The fact remains that the nice The Joye and Tribulations of documents put before this Court Dyre, Chephery Ped

the Randome in Honglong-deriai diciass no-theft even on the‍ Candem Händen. (Bob

The defendants further say that

12 material times thereafter until May 1961, the ... dollars es sold formed part of the balance | forward, exchange contracts were standing to the credit of the

the 1.K. dothe ted to convers mperies into UB. dollar vergids. defendente U.8, dollar secount with

Pausing here, it may be noted that their United States agents, or cor.

I hold that, also, surmumit to the

this passage has been cited by.Frot. respondents, in Belgian American verbal serenen, the US--dollare so

Don Varted Banking Corporation in New York

were delivered to the

Cheshire (Private Internation Law. and that at sil material times, they plaintiffs and were that va-deponited 4th ann, at paze 201) ad bring a pileged facta, by. Mr Chan of any Roth Random, Dorothy Perry), Cire

document. It is hard, therefore, paper and spipha by them with me, defendant, who,

correct exportion of the law;" had an account in their own name

The case of Bolrain v Well, to see how that can be made e by Jack Shapherd with their agents in New York thenceforth held them a marina, which was, sufficient is sover their

I also hold, though with hesitalion, being so clearly distinguishable on

mandamus ngairiat | Teke miscellaneo commitments. In the that they were to held in the The tacte, only avall the defendants basis for

United States of America part. In so far as the hypothetics; Bustra the Commissioner of Police United States of America including the de rodents secs in that don riven by penning Hangles in in Inverliests that par +2]sele commitment

particular correspondente plicable to the ela of the present

under. these

BCCOUNT WIGS KEMIK

in New York.

forward exchange, contract.

ACCOUNT. FROZEN

"On the acts the boltion is in aliments or tha? ww.panamkeyin ZELO TUMA

The plaintiffs' "my that the debit | my opinion, that the forward

(the) Court);

of the HK. dollar, mRTEIO_MONAH/Kcharge contračta have been com- } put, jgain with respect. I'äm totable:Polace Brow PiltANTIDIMENS

and the credit of the US.

pletely performed and the rehtorina or cheap MANY M martin" acceợunt · in their MOCOUTES | the obligatione of. Hoskins (***) *OL. 14

with the defendants in Hongkong Uterunder have been murtis, dia- | Chyw pwhich ẫu think merely recorded in mecutory oblign= { chaprad.

tion that the bank in, preserving is What things sabe poaltion with Fakih, TWhen „drafis" should make an "klowanos de regard to the "Vile, dolians

| for any question of

Mullinshaw (Ralph

Bick

OVCIL

(second-defendant); who lock

ed 'the gate.

Alleged

that to could not, have been in

Crown Counsel told the Cour Chopper Attack

way doubt whoever as to the

31-year-old blirik.

#

man

purpose of Mr Vanthall's pre was reported to have made WETO MY Vanithally chopper stuck on his anidavit said he disclosed to Mo

the purpose of his. He wild, and aliter-in-law, dübele

had writ

him, and be explainvadilo, khám Street, Perond

he was going: to serpe| MAN SETHA BO'clock, bin 34 Föörlem af

But for the ba

half hours. MIL)

the hotel wenė, locké

Alaw,bout, 60°F

trão follice have diluined thỏ