1931-07-29 — Page 5

WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 1931.

THE CHINA MAIL.

YORKSHIRE AVENGE SHEFFIELD DEFEAT

GLOUCESTER DEFEATED

BY MACAULAY

NINE WICKETS? ·

MARGIN

NEW ZEALANDERS IN LOW SCORING

GAME.

DULEEPSINHJI'S SEVENTH

H

London, Yesterday.

Sussex beat Worcestershire by an innings and 133 runs at Dudley.

Scores:--- Worcesters 6 (Langridge J. G for 15).

132 (Wensley Ś

75). Sussex: 301 for 3 dec, (K.

Duleepsinhji 161*).

"FRIENDLY.

.152

147

128

117

.106

.105.

Bell (Glamorgan v. Essex)

.144"

Cutmare (Essex v. Sussex)

107. 147

Pearce (Essex v. Lancashire) Hobbs (Burrey' v. Warwick) Hobbs (Surrey v. Somerset) Hobba (Surtey v. Sussex) Hobbs (Surrey v. Glamorgan) Hobbs (Surrey v. Derby) Lee (Middlesex v. Worcester) Lee (Middlesex v. Glamorgan) S. Lee (Derbyshire v. Northants)..173

Lee (Derby v. Essex)

M. Tursbell (Glamorgan v

Essex)

for

Bowley (Susser v. Surrey)

Bowley (Sunsex v. Essex)

Bowley (Sussex . Lancs.)

Hampshire drew with the New Bowley (Sussex v. Gloucester) Zealanders at Bournemouth.

Scores:-

Hampshire: 104 (H. G. Vivian 5

for 44) 57 for 9 dec. (C. F. W.

Allcott 8 for 38).

. for 20)

51 for 3 wickets.

Century List.

Yorkshire, by defenting Gloucestershire to-day at Bristol, New Zealanders: 69 (Kennedy 7 avenged their defent in the sensational game at Sheffield on June 3. The return match displayed.the mind of a great captain to the best advantage · --- F. E. Greenwood declared Yorkshire's Innings closed when 64 runs in arrears and placed his shock bowlers in possession of the field and Gloucester were dismissed for 70 runs, Macaulay capturing six very cheap wickets.

The most remarkable declaration came from Cowbdidge where Northants declared their first innings at 51 for one wicket! Glamorgan declared their innings as soon as they had taken the lead and proceeded to skittle Northants out for 59 to win comfort ably by five wickets.

K. S. 'Duleepsinhji, the amazing Indian cricketer and nephew of the great “Ranji," registered his seventh three-ligure total this season, when he scored 161 not out against Worcestershire at Dudley. Sussex, by dint of their victory, have now climbed third position in the table.

to

Only 291 runs were scored for the loss of 32 wickets at Bourne- mouth in the match between the New Zealand touring eleven and Hampshire. At the close of play the tourists were 31 runs in arrears with seven wickets in hand. Their batting was not encouraging on the eve of the second Test match.

The following were the most

noteworthy batting and howling feats

Accomplished during the

week-end cricket programmĘ Z—-----

K. S. Duleepsinhji (Hammex) 161*

Batting

Astill (Leicester),

Harracks (Lancashire)

Storer (Derbyshire)

.115

100* 97

G. T.-S. Stevens (Middlesex). 90

denotes not out..

Bowling.

Harris (Notts).....

Kennedy (Hampshire)

.8 for 80 for 29

Langridge, J. (Sussex) for 15 Macaulay (Yorkshire)...6 for 27

C.

F. W. Allcott (NZ) 6 for 38

C. Clay (Glamorgan) 5 for 22 Slater (Derbyshire)

Parker (Gloucester)

H. G. Vivian (N..).

1. A. R. Peebles

.5 for 32

5 for 38 For 44

Middle-

5 for 58.

5 for 50

C. S. Marriott (Kent)

Wensley (Sussex)

Tyldesley. B. (Lanes) Ryan (Glamorgan)

for 75 for 79 ...for 12

Full results as cabled by Reuter were as follow:-

Middlesex took first innings points from Derbyshire at Ilkeston..

Scores:-

Derby: 184 (Storer 97, I. A. R.

Peebles 5 for 58)

188 for one wicket. Middlesex: 200 (G. T. S. Stevens 90, Slater 5 for 82),

Leicestershire took first fan'ngs | points from Warwickshire at Hinck- Ley

Scores:--

Leicester: 304 (Astill 115). Warwick: 128 and 167 for 2.

Kent took first innings from Surrey at the Oval.

Scores:--

100

The following have scored cen- turies in the County Championship competition this season :— Homes (Yorkshire v. Warwick) 230. Holmes (Yorkshire v. Notis) .133 .232 Hendren (Middlesex v. Notts)

Hendren (Middlesex v. Warwick) 189 Hendren (Middlesex v.

1

Hendren (Middlesex v. 2) 17

.244

144. 137 105 103

Timma (Northantar. Derbyshire) 147 Timms (Northants 7. Hanis)...151 Tyldesley (B.) (Lancashire V.

Warwick) Tyldesley (E) (Lanes. v. Kent) 120 Tyldesley (E) (Lancashire v

Gloucester)

Tyldesley (E) (Lancashire

.....144

112

109

Essex) 11 for 124 THE LOT OF HERBERT

SUTCLIFFE

Critics Propose. His Exclusion from Tests.

W

ABSURD POLICY.

Bakewell (Northants v. Glouces Y.A. R. Peckles (Middlesex

ter) AAA.134 Bakewell (Northants Y. Glamor- I. A. R. Peebles (Middlesex

gan) S

.113 v.. Glamorgan) Gibbons (Worcester v. Middlesex), 1831. A. R. Pechies (Middlesex

11 for 130 Gibbons (Worcester v. Northants) 113 v. Somerset). Gibbons (Worcester v. Derdy)

10 for 107. .109 Vority (Yorkshire v. Glamor- Gibbons (Worcester v. Notts) ...110

gan) **

www.1.1 for 51 Leo (J) (Somerset, v. Northants) 113

Verity (Yorkshire v. War Ames (Kent v. Sussex)

wick) 10 for 36 Bower (Yorks. v. Middlesex) 11 for 102 Bowes (Yerks. v. Hampshire) 30 for 132 Bowes (Yorkshire v. Surrey) 10 for 125 Root (Worcester v. Leicester) 13.for 98 Root (Worcester v. Essex) 10 for 192

Herbert Sutcliffe, who, whether Mitchell (Derby v. Sussex) 12 for: 30 playing for Yorkshire or England is Wensley (Bussex v. Derby) 12 for 93 second in the batting order, seems Tate (Sussex v. Northants) 12 for 58 fated, in spite of his thirteen Test Ryan (Glamorgan v. Wor-

cester)

centuries, to occupy second place Cook (Sussex v. Glamorgan)...103

Geary (Leicester v. Kent) .,11 for 122 2130 in the affections of cricket- Cook (Busser v. Gloucester)

wickets taken in a single innings, lovers, and to have to fight for

Scoring Records. Keaton (Notts v. Essex)

his place in the England eleven O'Connor (Estex v. Lancashire). 122 lowest scores compiled in

The following are the highest and states a Home paper.

the

..106 Croom (Warwick v. Natts) ..159 Croom (Warwick v. Kent) 109 Croom (Warwick v. Northants) 105 Croom Warwick v. Glamorgan) 103 Croom (Warwick v. Derby) 103 Croom Warwick v. Lancashire) 102 Neale (Gloucester T. Leicester) 105 Kennedy (Hampshire' v. North

ents)

O'Connor (Essex v. Kent) Bates (Warwick v. Notts)

103.

101. 100.

100

.II for 99

105 County Championship to date.

Highest scores .161* 621 for 9. dec-Middlesex v. Notts at

Trent Bridge. 100 579 for 4 dec-Surrey 7. Somerset at

R. ES. Wyatt (Warwick v. ....127

Northants) R. E.. B. Wyatt (Warwick Y.

Surrey)

Y.

.108

139

A. W. Carr (Notin v. Northants) 140 A. W. Carr (Notts v. Worcesler) 127 A. W. Carr (Netts v. Middlesex) 102 C. T. Bray (Essex v. Northants) 100 Mead (Hampshire v. Sussex) Mead (Hampshire v. Northants). 105 P. G. H. Fender (Surrey v..

Somerset) P. G. H. Fender (Surrey v.

Derby)...

100* Iddon (Lancashire v. Middlesex) 137 Smith (Derby v. Essex)

131 Eastman (Essex v. Glamorgan) .129 Arnold (Hampshire v. Northants) 128* Hendren (Middlesex v. Warwick) 100

Arnold (Hants v. Gloucester).. 111 Arnold (Hants v. Northants)....100 Sutcliffe (Yorkshire v. Kent) Sutcliffe (Yorkshire v. Somerset) 183 .230

V. W. C. Jupp (Northants v. Sutcliffe (Yorkshire v. Warwick) 129

Hampshire)

128 Sutcliffe (Yorkshire v. Middlesex) 120

C. Japp (Northants V. W. Sutcliffe (Yorkshire v. Hampshire) 107

Hants)

.101 Hardinge (Keat v. Essex) Parks (H.) (Sussex v: Essex)

.200.

128 Woolley Kert v. Yorkshire)

Hardinge (Kent Lancashire) .111 Wealler (Kent v. Lanca)

Walker (Notts T. Somerset Woolley Kent v. Northants) .168.

.125 Walker (Notts v. Northanta).. 102 .... 109 Woolley (Kent v. Warwick).

Ducat (Surrey v. Warwick) ... .103.

+125 Leyland (Yorkshire v. Surrey) ..124 N. Haig (Middlesex . Notts)..123 E. W. Dawson (Leicester v. Glou-

cester Shipman (Leicester v. Middlesex) 120 Rev. J. II. Parsons (Warwick v.

Lancashire)

.119 Rev. J. H. Parsons (Warwick v. Mitchell (Yorkshire v. Hampshire) 119

Somerset)

106 Nichol (Worcester v. Middlesex) 116 Astill (Leicester Y, Sussex) Astill (Leicester w Warwick) Storer (Derby v. Burrey)... Alderman (Derby v. Barrey) 113 Staples, A. (Notts v. Somerset) 118 Staples, A. (Notts v. Yorkshire) 131

.189

Sandham (Surrey v. Glamorgan) 175 Sandham (Surrey v. Somerset) 181 Sandham (Surrey v. Derby)....107 Sandham (Surrey T. Hampshire) 113 T. S. Steveria (Middlesex v. Warwick)

.170 G. T

TS. Stevens (Middlesex v. Worcester) ...

..115

Hemmend (Gloucester v. Sussex) 168 Hammond (Gloucester v. Notts) 103 Hammond Gloucester) ..... 100 | Hammond (Gloucester v. Wor- points Shepherd (Surrey v. Essex)

cester)

.100 .. 167. Shepherd (Surrey v. Warwick) 140 Hopwood (Lancashire v. Surrey) 165 Kent: 257 for 7 dee., and 67 for 3 Hopwood (Lancashire v. War-

wickets.

wick) Langridge, J. (Sussex v. Glamor-

.161 Walters (Worcester v. Northants) 153 Dacre (Gloucester v. Northants) 165 Dacre (Gloucester v. Warwick) .119

Surrey: 121 (C. S. Marriott 5 for

59) and 134 for f.

Essex took first innings points from Somersetshire at Leyton,

Scores:-

Somerset: 224 and 28 for 1. Essex: 249 for 6 dec.

Notts took first innings points from Lancashire at Manchester.

Scores:-

Lancashire: 249 (Horrocka 100*,

Harris 8 for 80)

9 for no wicket.

Dacre (Gloucester v. Lancs.)...100 K. S. Duleepsinhji (Sussex v

Worcester)

K. S. Duleepsinhil (Sussex

Essex)

.161

.123

116

115 .115.

Hallows (Lance. v. Gloucenter) ..100

"

Efforts to secure his omission from representative teams have

Australia in 1923, when critics. been continuous. They began In

inspire the rest of the team with asserted that his batting did not

confidence. They continued during the following Summer when the Australians visited England. Battery Agninet Him, Warwick- magnificently confuted his detrac-

Then, although Sutcliffe

the Oral.

Edgbaston, Birming ham.

J. C. White (Somerset v. Notta) 100 521 for 7 dee-Notts v. Warwick at Paynter (Lancashire v. Warwick), 100 Gunn, G. (Notts v. Warwick).183 Gunn, V. G. (Notts v. Warwick) 100 (511 for 3 dec-Warwick v. Notts at Qualie, B. W, (Worcester

Middlesex)

107

Edgbaston, Birming-

ham,

Horrocks (Lancashire v. Natts) 100 503 for dee-Surrey

dènotes not out.

+ scored in his benefit match.

477.

A Century scored in each innings.

Bowling Honours.

shire at the Oval -Suasex v. Essex

Brighton,

at

at the Oval.

had

tors, some British wineacres, för- getful of the fact that the slowness

476 for 5 dec-Surrey v. Glamorgan with which Sutcliffe in county The following have taken ten or 170 for 7 dec-Sussex . Surrey at is negligible where Tests are con

*

the Oval

games approaches his best form,

more wickets in a County Cham- plonship match:

470 for 7 dec. Sussex . Glamorgan-cerned seized upon that dourdess Parker (Gloucester v. Notts) 15 for 113 468 for 8 dee-Yorkshire v. Warwick and pressed for his exclusion, The

shire at Cardiff,

and his adventitious leg injury, Parker (Gloucester v. Sur

rey)

..11 for 153:

at Edgbaston, Birm- agitation continued during the Parker (Gloucester v. Mid-

Ingham. 467 for 9 dec-Yorkshire v. Kent at 1928, when, in spite of a shoulder South African tour in England of dierex)

10 for 180

Folkestone, Parker (Gloucester v. Wor- Parker (Gloucester v. Derby) 14 for 91 453" for 9 dec.--Gloucester v. North-weakness that curbed his driving

cester)

11 for 179 Lowest scores

ants at Kettering. Packer (Gloucester v. War

$1-Somerset v. Gloucester at Bristol cester)... Freeman (Kent v. Leicenter). 15 for 1449-Essex v. Lunes, at Liverpool

(Fry's Ground). Freeman (Kent Essex)15 for 142 59 Northants v. Glamorgan at Cow- Freeman (Kent v, Middlesex), 11 for 102

Froeman (Kent Lancs) 10 for 7981-Gloucestershire. v. Lancashire at

bridge Freeman (Kent v. Somerset) 10 for 115

Manchester. Freeman (Kent v Leicester) 10 for 121 61-Surrey v. Yorkshire at Bradford. Freeman (Kent v. Northants), 12 for 9462-Somerset v Notts at Bath

.10 for 83

sea

Mercer (Glamorgan v. War-

.12 for 80 62-Glamorgan. Yorkshire at Swan- wick) Tyldesley (R.) (Lanes. v.

Worcester)

67-Sussex v. Derbyshire at Chester- .11 for 59.

field. Tyldesley (R.) (Lancs. v.

Hampshire v. Notts at Trent

Notts 11 for 115

Bridge 68-Worcestershire ..13 for 152

v. Leicestershire

Glamorgan) Tyldesley (R.) (Lancashire

T. Somerset)

FIRST CLASS COUNTY CHAMPIONSHIP TABLE TO DATE.

Notts (1)

Derbyshire (9) Essex (8)

1st Inns. No Pora

P. W. L. W. L. Resnit. Pts. Ft.

Yorkshire (3)

ཐ་ ༠

4

285 196

0

285 155

Sussex (7)

B 55 1

...133

Gloucestershire (2) ̧.

I

300 152

8 4 5 2

0

285 161

K. S. Duleepsinhji (Sussex

V

Kent (5)

21 8 7 2 3

1

315 143

Kent)

.127

Lancashire (1)

. 9. Duleepaiahji (Sussex T

Surrey)

Surrey (8)

21 6 6 3 2

315 187

315 129

162

K. S. Duleepsinhji (Sussex v.

Essex).

21 6

K., S. Duleepsinhji (Sussex

Leicester)

:140 V.

Middlesex (16)

Warwickshire (15)

.112

Hampshire (18)

Somersetshire (14) ̧.

Leicestershire (12)

Glamorganshire (11)

Northamptonshire (17)

K. S. Duleepaluhji (Sussex v.

Northants)....

112

Notts: 263 (Tyldesley R. 5 for 79),C. T. Bray (Essex v. Glamorgan) 122

Glamorganskire beat Northamp tonshire by fire wickets at Cow- bridge.

Scures: Northants: 51 for 1 dec.,

I

69 (J. C. Clay 5 for 22, Ryan 4 for 12). Glamorgan 51 for 2 dec., and 60

for 5.

Yorkshire beat Gloucestershire by nine wickets. at Bristol (Fry's Ground).

Scores:- Gloucester: 182 for 9 dec.,

70 (Macaulay 6 for

27). Yorkshire 119 for 9 dec., (Parker 5

for .38) 187 for one wicket.

Mead (Hampshire v. Surrey)...165. C. C. Case (Somerset v. Surrey) 155 C. C. Case (Somerset . Hants) 131 Iddon (Lancashire v. Kent)....153 Hearne (Middlesex v. Leicester), 152*

Hearne (Middlesex v. Glamor

104 gan) Hearne (Middlesex v. Glamorgan) 101"

Worcestershire (10).

.21 4

300 124 315 118 315 112

#15 110

315

300

.20.4 8

300

1 2 3·5

285

20.3 8 1 4

800

78

..19 1

7

285

The figures in brackets were the positions occupied by the countles at the close of the 1930 season. The method of scoring this year

as follows:-15 points for a win; 7 points for a tie; 5 points for a win on the first innings and 8 points for a loss on first innings; 4 points for a tie on the first innings and points for a no result

at Leicester. 63-Worcester v. Besex at Leyton. 69-Hampshire v. Essex at Colchester. 69-Easer V Hampshire at Colchester. sivity to agrgession, Hence, his great achievements have inspired not love but a somewhat formal admiration

Making the Whole Hobbs has been the soloist, so to speak, and Stucliffe has confined himself to the complementary task of making a perfect whole. More over, to pursue the metaphor, Sutcliffe has had, like the accom- panist, to subserve other artists en the programme. No wonder he has had to economise his strength at the expense of attractiveness!

When every deduction is made, however, there. remains much that ts, unique about him. He has al- ways been one of both the York shire and England opening pairs; and it is doubtful whether any other batsman can vie with him in this respect.

Infallible Judgment. His judgmont is almost Infallible and accounts for his success on every kind of wicket, and also for the rarity in Test matches of In nings from his bat of fewer than 90. His patience and stamina have been no inexhaustible as to resist the Australian bowlers for

power and cramped his forward dreds, including, as in Australia, play, Sutcliffe scored four hun-

too, when Sutcliffe again confuted two in one match. Last Summer,

against Australia, there were.mur- his erities by heading the averaged murs that he was not worth bla place.

Tragic Omission.,

These efforts culminated in his tragic omission. without audible protest, from the team that fared so badly against South Africa last Winter.

One section of the Press has often been grudging in praise: In- deed, in describing the last Test match at Manchester, where Sutcliffe acored a magnificent 74 and Hobbs was almost totally cclipsed, a great Australian player did not even mention Sutcliffe's name! In addition to this in- nings, Sutcliffe has many brilliant ones to his credit, proving Mr. A. Noble'e contention that he score vory quickly. Instance his 209 partner ship with Holmes against Werwickshire recently, and ignore, if possible, the Old Trafford experience. Two others may be re- called.

-

international Style.

can

He was associated with Holmes in a partnership of 265 against Surrey, scored in two hours ond twenty-five minutes, during the Semmer of 1926, Sutcliffe's share being 131 not out; and in two hours and ten minutes he scored 196 for England against the cham- pion county in 1926, when his chief hits were one 6 and twenty-three 4's and included three 4's and one 0 in one over. He rarely bats like this in a Test, however; and his in- tornational .style furnishes psychological problem.

He is doubtless, as P. F. Warner. asserts, at his best in Test games; average of 14 against but in them, grim fighter though he whole day on four accasions, he seems to prefer tactics that Australia is for 30 innings are negative rather than positive, the highest recorded; and the sound to the spectacular, pas- his total of six Test centuries (Continued at foot of preceding against South Africa is unequalled.

Column)

BEST QUALITY.

SILVER

PLATED

WARE.

BOTH QUALITY

"AND FINISH

IS GUARANTE

ALL THE BEST AND NECESSARY HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES KEPT IN STOCK.

WHEN PURCHASING SEE THAT SUCH NECESSITIES

ARE ROM A HOUSE OF

REPUTE.

MARMALADE JARS:

LANE CRAWFORD LTD

I may switch from golf to tennis and give up both for bowling. But-

NEVER CHANGE FROM Gold Flake

ASK FOR

As mild as a sun-kissed day

in June as mellow as a rare

old port as sweet as a rich, ripe Honey Dew melon-Gold

Flake for mine anywhere, any time always

WILS GOLD FLAKE

CIGARETTES

AS GOOD AS GOLD

Sole

RONEODEX

The X-ray

of Business

Records worth keeping are worth protecting.

MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY.

MINIMUM LABOUR.

Card in actual View classified in any desired order.

DODWELL & CO. LTD.

JEEN'S BUIL

Tele

Page 5Page 6