The user wants me to proofread OCR output of a historical Hong Kong government gazette/legislation table. The text appears to be a table with columns: DATE, (G4), LEGISLATION, SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION, GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette.
The OCR is messy - columns are jumbled, lines broken, some numbers look wrong (e.g., 1985 instead of 1935, 1995 instead of 1935, 1999 instead of 1939, 1998 instead of 1938, 1996 instead of 1936, 1999 instead of 1939). Need to reconstruct the table properly.
First, I need to understand the structure. The header shows:
Then rows for 1940 with dates in May and June.
Looking at the data, it seems like each row has:
The OCR has mixed up the columns. Let me try to parse row by row.
First row after header: "1940." then "10th May." then "REGULATION,—Continued." then "41 of 1935-Corrected copy of Part I and Part II of the Register of Medical and Surgical Practitioners qualified to practise medicine and surgery in the Colony." then "16 of 1914-Dental Register." then "do." then "17th May." then "16th May." then "32 of" then "10 of" then "22nd May." then "30th May." then "31st May." then "30th May." then "do." then "do." then "23rd May." then "31st May." then "30th May." then "28th May." then "11th June." then "13th June." then "14th June." then "do." then "do." then "19th June." then "do." then "28th June." then "do." then "27th June." then "24th June." then "New" then "1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer or motor vessel prohibited." then "1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Ordinance." then "1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922." then "15 of 1985-Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance." then "Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662 authorized for use as a Roman Catholic Cemetery." then "21 of 1984-Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance, 1834. Amendment to first schedule under the beading Death Register Offices." then "21 of 1939-Resolution extending powers to note-issuing banks." then "13 of 1935-Amendments to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 of the heading "Restaurants and Eating-houses" and the by-laws set forth in the Schedule thereunder." then "19 of 1995-Amendment to the by-laws in the Schedule to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading Food Shops." then "**" then "LI" then """ then "15 of 1985-Amendments of the by-laws under the heading Domestia Cleanliness and Prevention of Disease" and sub-heading Restriction of Sale of Certain Food-stuffs set forth in Schedule A to the Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, 1935." then "32 of 1989 Amendment to Section 3 (1) (d) of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1939." then "92 of 1939-Amendment to first proviso to section 11 (2) of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1930." then "10 of 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1899." then "25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons) (Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940." then "1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." then "40 of" then "32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1 of the Hong Kong Defence Reserve Regulations." then "10 of 1939—Amendment to section 15 (1) (i) of the Volunteer Ordinance, 1998." then "18 of 1936–Amendments to rates made under the Telecommunication Ordinance, 1936." then "32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915. Prohibition of importation of certain merchandise from Macao." then "98 of 1999 Amendments to the Essential Commodities Reserves Regulations." then "40 of 1994—Amendments to the Cremation Regulations, Part I." then "88 of 1939-Amendments to the Essential Commodities Reserves Regulations." then "18 of 1930-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1996. Rescission of Government Notification No. 678 published in the Government Gazette of 21st June, 1940." then "1902-Resolution made and passed by the Legislative Council under the Tramways Ordinance, 1902." then "1988-Amendments to the regulations made under the Volunteer Ordinance, 1999." then "10 of" then "10 of" then "No. 536 of 10th May." then "No. 537 of 10th May." then "No. 540 of 17th May." then "No. 545 of 17th May." then "No. 566 of 23rd May." then "No. 580 of 31st May." then "No. 589 of 31st May." then "No. 590 of 31st May." then "No. 591 of 31st May." then "No. 592 of 31st May." then "No. 602 of 31st May." then "No. 604 of 31st May." then "No. 607 of 31st May." then "No. 630 of 7th June." then "No. 645 of 14th June." then "No. 646 of 14th June." then "No. 659 of 14th June." then "No. 673 of 21st June." then "No. 874 of 31st June." then "No. 675 of 21st June." then "No. 678 of 21st June." then "No. 710 of 28th June." then "No. 711 of 28th June." then "No. 714 of 28th June." then "No. 784 of 28th June."
This is a mess. Clearly the OCR read columns vertically or something. The actual table likely has rows where each row corresponds to a government notification with date, legislation reference, substance, and notification number/date.
Given the notification numbers at the end (No. 536 to No. 784), there are about 24 notifications. The dates in the beginning (10th May, 17th May, 23rd May, 31st May, 7th June, 14th June, 21st June, 28th June) match the notification dates.
Let me try to match each notification to a legislation entry.
The legislation references appear to be:
But there are 24 notification numbers (536 to 784). Let's count: 536,537,540,545,566,580,589,590,591,592,602,604,607,630,645,646,659,673,674?,675,678,710,711,714,784. That's 25 notifications? Actually list: 536,537,540,545,566,580,589,590,591,592,602,604,607,630,645,646,659,673,674? (874 is likely 674), 675,678,710,711,714,784. That's 25 entries.
But the legislation entries I counted are 26. Maybe one is a header "REGULATION,—Continued." and "New" might be a section header.
The OCR also has "do." which means "ditto" - same as previous.
The dates column: 10th May, 17th May, 16th May? Wait there are multiple dates: 10th May, 17th May, 16th May, 22nd May, 30th May, 31st May, 30th May, 23rd May, 31st May, 30th May, 28th May, 11th June, 13th June, 14th June, 19th June, 28th June, 27th June, 24th June. That's 18 dates. But notifications are 25.
Probably the table has multiple columns: Date of Gazette, Legislation, Substance, Notification No. and Date.
The OCR has scrambled the columns. The best approach is to reconstruct the table as it likely appeared: a list of government notifications with their dates, legislation references, substance, and notification numbers.
Given the instruction to output Markdown with tables, I should create a Markdown table with columns: Date, Legislation, Substance of Regulation, Government Notification.
But the OCR doesn't clearly separate rows. However, the notification numbers at the end are in order and each has a date. The legislation entries are in the same order? Let's assume the legislation entries list corresponds to the notification numbers in order.
Let's pair them sequentially:
Notification No. 536 of 10th May -> Legislation: 41 of 1935 - Corrected copy...
Notification No. 537 of 10th May -> Legislation: 16 of 1914 - Dental Register.
Notification No. 540 of 17th May -> Legislation: 1915 - Importation of cargo from Canton...
Notification No. 545 of 17th May -> Legislation: 1899 - Amendment to Merchant Shipping...
Notification No. 566 of 23rd May -> Legislation: 15 of 1935 - Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance.
Notification No. 580 of 31st May -> Legislation: Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662...
Notification No. 589 of 31st May -> Legislation: 21 of 1934 - Births and Deaths Registration...
Notification No. 590 of 31st May -> Legislation: 21 of 1939 - Resolution extending powers...
Notification No. 591 of 31st May -> Legislation: 13 of 1935 - Amendments to Public Health (Food)...
Notification No. 592 of 31st May -> Legislation: 19 of 1935 - Amendment to by-laws...
Notification No. 602 of 31st May -> Legislation: 15 of 1935 - Amendments of by-laws under Domestic Cleanliness...
Notification No. 604 of 31st May -> Legislation: 32 of 1939 - Amendment to Section 3(1)(d) of Compulsory Service...
Notification No. 607 of 31st May -> Legislation: 92 of 1939 - Amendment to first proviso to section 11(2) of Compulsory Service...
Notification No. 630 of 7th June -> Legislation: 10 of 1899 - Amendment to Merchant Shipping...
Notification No. 645 of 14th June -> Legislation: 25 of 1914 - Trading with the Enemy...
Notification No. 646 of 14th June -> Legislation: 1912 - Amendments to regulations under Vehicles and Traffic...
Notification No. 659 of 14th June -> Legislation: 32 of 1939 - Amendment to regulation 1 of HK Defence Reserve...
Notification No. 673 of 21st June -> Legislation: 10 of 1939 - Amendment to section 15(1)(i) of Volunteer Ordinance...
Notification No. 674 of 21st June (OCR says 874) -> Legislation: 18 of 1936 - Amendments to rates under Telecommunication...
Notification No. 675 of 21st June -> Legislation: 32 of 1915 - Importation and Exportation Ordinance...
Notification No. 678 of 21st June -> Legislation: 98 of 1939 - Amendments to Essential Commodities Reserves...
Notification No. 710 of 28th June -> Legislation: 40 of 1934 - Amendments to Cremation Regulations...
Notification No. 711 of 28th June -> Legislation: 88 of 1939 - Amendments to Essential Commodities Reserves...
Notification No. 714 of 28th June -> Legislation: 18 of 1936 - Telecommunication Ordinance, rescission of Govt Notification 678...
Notification No. 784 of 28th June -> Legislation: 1902 - Resolution under Tramways Ordinance...
But there is also "1988-Amendments to the regulations made under the Volunteer Ordinance, 1999." That would be 25th legislation, but we have 24 notifications? Actually we have 25 notifications (536 to 784 inclusive count: let's count: 536,537,540,545,566,580,589,590,591,592,602,604,607,630,645,646,659,673,674,675,678,710,711,714,784 = 25). And legislation entries: I count 25 if we include the last one. The "New" and "1915-Importation..." might be separate. The "REGULATION,—Continued." is likely a header.
Also there is "do." entries which might indicate same date as previous.
The date column in the OCR shows many dates: 10th May, 17th May, 16th May, 22nd May, 30th May, 31st May, 30th May, 23rd May, 31st May, 30th May, 28th May, 11th June, 13th June, 14th June, 19th June, 28th June, 27th June, 24th June. These might be the "Date of Gazette" for each legislation? But the notification numbers already have dates.
Probably the original table has columns: Date (of Gazette), (G4) maybe a column for something, Legislation, Substance, Government Notification No. and Date.
The OCR has a column "(G4)" at top. Might be a classification.
Given the complexity, I'll reconstruct a clean Markdown table with the data I can deduce, correcting obvious OCR errors (years like 1985->1935, 1995->1935, 1999->1939, 1998->1938, 1996->1936, 1994->1934, 1989->1939, 1988->1938, 1930->1936? Actually 18 of 1930-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1996 -> should be 18 of 1936-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1936). Also "Domestia" -> "Domestic". "beading" -> "heading". "merchandise" spelled correctly. "Ordinance, 1834" -> likely 1894. "Volunteer Ordinance, 1998" -> 1938. "Volunteer Ordinance, 1999" -> 1939. "Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1930" -> 1939. "Essential Commodities Reserves Regulations" years 1999->1939, 1994->1934.
Also "40 of" alone might be "40 of 1912" for Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance? Actually "40 of" appears before "32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1...". In the legislation list, after "1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." there is "40 of" then "32 of 1939...". Possibly "40 of 1912" is the legislation number for the Vehicles and Traffic Regulations? But the text says "1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." That might be the substance, and the legislation column might be "40 of 1912"? However, the pattern is "Number of Year - Title". For example "41 of 1935 - Corrected copy...". So "1912-Amendments..." is missing the number. Could be "40 of 1912" but the OCR split it. Let's see: "25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy... 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912. 40 of 32 of 1939-Amendment..." Actually the OCR shows: "25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons) (Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940. 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912. 40 of 32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1 of the Hong Kong Defence Reserve Regulations." It might be that "40 of 1912" is the legislation for the Vehicles and Traffic Regulations, but the OCR merged "40 of" with the next line. However, the next line is "32 of 1939". So maybe "40 of 1912" is separate. But there is no "1912" in the legislation column for that entry? Let's check the notification numbers: No. 646 of 14th June corresponds to "1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." That might be legislation "40 of 1912"? But the year 1912 is the ordinance year, not the legislation number. The legislation number could be something like "40 of 1912"? Actually the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance is 1912, and the regulations made under it might be numbered. The entry says "Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." So the legislation reference might be the ordinance itself? But other entries have "Number of Year - Title". For example "16 of 1914 - Dental Register." That is a regulation under an ordinance? Hmm.
Given the difficulty, I'll present the table as reconstructed from the notification numbers and the legislation/substance pairs in order, correcting obvious errors.
I'll create a Markdown table with columns: Date of Gazette, Legislation, Substance of Regulation, Government Notification.
The Date of Gazette can be taken from the notification date (e.g., 10th May 1940). The legislation and substance from the list. The government notification number and date from the list at the end.
I'll assume the year is 1940 for all (since the header says 1940). The dates in the notification numbers are in 1940.
Let's construct the table row by row.
Row 1: Date: 10th May 1940, Legislation: 41 of 1935, Substance: Corrected copy of Part I and Part II of the Register of Medical and Surgical Practitioners qualified to practise medicine and surgery in the Colony, Government Notification: No. 536 of 10th May.
Row 2: Date: 10th May 1940, Legislation: 16 of 1914, Substance: Dental Register, Government Notification: No. 537 of 10th May.
Row 3: Date: 17th May 1940, Legislation: 1915 (Importation and Exportation Ordinance?), Substance: Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer or motor vessel prohibited, Government Notification: No. 540 of 17th May.
But the legislation reference for row 3 might be "32 of 1915"? Actually later there is "32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915. Prohibition of importation of certain merchandise from Macao." That's a different entry. The entry "1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer or motor vessel prohibited." might be under "32 of 1915"? But the OCR shows "New 1915-Importation of cargo from Canton...". The "New" might indicate a new regulation. Could be "32 of 1915" but that appears later. Let's check the order: After "do." and dates, we have "New 1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer or motor vessel prohibited. 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Ordinance. 1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922. 15 of 1985-Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance." This seems like a list of substances. The legislation numbers might be missing for the first two. The first might be "32 of 1915"? But later "32 of 1915" appears with a different substance (prohibition from Macao). So maybe the first is a different legislation number. Could be "10 of 1915"? Not sure.
Given the OCR is messy, I'll keep the substance as written and put the legislation reference as it appears in the text (e.g., "1915" for the first, "1899" for the second). But the pattern is "Number of Year". For the first, it's just "1915". Might be a typo for "32 of 1915"? But we have two entries with 1915: one for Canton cargo, one for Macao merchandise. They could be different regulations under the same ordinance. The legislation column might be the ordinance name: "Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915". The substance differs.
I think the best is to replicate the data as closely as possible, correcting obvious OCR errors, and present in a table. Since the user wants proofreading, not restructuring, but the output format says to use Markdown table syntax to reconstruct tabular data. So I should output a table.
I'll create a table with the columns as in the header: DATE, (G4), LEGISLATION, SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION, GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette.
But the (G4) column is mysterious; maybe it's a column for "G4" which might be a category. In the OCR, there is "(G4)" under the header. Might be a single value for all rows? Or maybe it's a column with "G4" for each row. I'll include it as a column with "G4" for each row.
Let's parse the OCR more systematically. The text starts with:
"20
DATE.
(G4)
LEGISLATION.
SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION.
GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette.
1940.
10th May.
REGULATION,—Continued.
41 of 1935-Corrected copy of Part I and Part II of the Register of Medical and Surgical Practitioners qualified to practise medicine and surgery in the Colony.
16 of 1914-Dental Register.
do.
17th May.
16th May.
32 of
10 of
22nd May.
30th May.
31st May.
30th May.
do.
do.
23rd May.
31st May.
30th May.
28th May.
11th June.
13th June.
14th June.
do.
do.
19th June.
do.
28th June.
do.
27th June.
24th June.
New
1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer
or motor vessel prohibited. 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or- dinance. 1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922. 15 of 1985-Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance.
Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662 authorized for use as a Roman Catholic Cemetery. 21 of 1984-Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance, 1834. Amendment to first schedule under the beading Death Register Offices." 21 of 1939-Resolution extending powers to note-issuing
banks.
13 of 1935-Amendments to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 of the heading "Restaurants and Eating-houses" and the by-laws set forth in the Schedule thereunder.
19 of 1995-Amendment to the by-laws in the Schedule to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading Food Shops.
**
LI
"
15 of 1985-Amendments of the by-laws under the heading Domestia Cleanliness and Prevention of Disease" and sub-heading Restriction of Sale of Certain Food-stuffs set forth in Schedule A to the Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, 1935.
32 of 1989 Amendment to Section 3 (1) (d) of the Com- pulsory Service Ordinance, 1939. 92 of 1939-Amendment to first proviso to section 11 (2)
of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1930. 10 of 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or-
dinance, 1899.
25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons)
(Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940. 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912.
40 of
32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1 of the Hong Kong
Defence Reserve Regulations.
10 of 1939—Amendment to section 15 (1) (i) of the
Volunteer Ordinance, 1998.
18 of 1936–Amendments to rates made under the Tele- communication Ordinance, 1936.
32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915. Prohibition of importation of certain mer- chandise from Macao.
98 of 1999 Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
40 of 1994—Amendments to the Cremation Regulations,
Part I.
88 of 1939-Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
18 of 1930-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1996. Rescission of Government Notification No. 678 published in the Government Gazette of 21st June, 1940.
1902-Resolution made and passed by the Legislative Council under the Tramways Ordinance, 1902.
1988-Amendments to the regulations made under
the Volunteer Ordinance, 1999.
10 of
10 of
No. 536 of 10th
May.
No. 537 of 10th
May.
No. 540 of 17th
May.
No. 545 of 17th
May.
No. 566 of 23rd
May.
No. 580 of 31st
May.
No. 589 of 31st
May.
No. 590 of 31st
May.
No. 591 of 31st
May.
No. 592 of 31st
May.
No. 602 of 31st
May.
No. 604 of 31st
May.
No. 607 of 31st
May.
No. 630 of 7th
June.
No. 645 of 14th
June.
No. 646 of 14th
June.
No. 659 of 14th
June.
No. 673 of 21st
June.
No. 874 of 31st
June.
No. 675 of 21st
June.
No. 678 of 21st
June.
No. 710 of 28th
June.
No. 711 of 28th
June.
No. 714 of 28th
June.
No. 784 of 28th
June."
It appears the OCR read the table in a columnar fashion but the columns are interleaved. The first column "DATE." has entries: 1940., 10th May., 17th May., 16th May., 22nd May., 30th May., 31st May., 30th May., 23rd May., 31st May., 30th May., 28th May., 11th June., 13th June., 14th June., 19th June., 28th June., 27th June., 24th June. That's 18 dates.
The second column "(G4)" maybe has "REGULATION,—Continued." and then "New" and then some symbols "**", "LI", "\"".
The third column "LEGISLATION." has entries: 41 of 1935, 16 of 1914, do., 32 of, 10 of, 15 of 1985, 21 of 1984, 21 of 1939, 13 of 1935, 19 of 1995, 15 of 1985, 32 of 1989, 92 of 1939, 10 of 1899, 25 of 1914, 1912, 40 of, 32 of 1939, 10 of 1939, 18 of 1936, 32 of 1915, 98 of 1999, 40 of 1994, 88 of 1939, 18 of 1930, 1902, 1988, 10 of, 10 of.
The fourth column "SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION." has the descriptions.
The fifth column "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette." has the notification numbers.
But the rows don't align because the OCR read vertically. However, the notification numbers at the end are 25 entries. The legislation entries are also about 25. The dates in the first column are 18, but some are "do." meaning same as previous.
Given the instruction to reconstruct tabular data, I think the best is to create a table with the notification numbers as the primary key, and match them with the legislation and substance in the order they appear in the text (since the text likely lists them in order of notification numbers). The notification numbers are in chronological order: 536 (10 May), 537 (10 May), 540 (17 May), 545 (17 May), 566 (23 May), 580 (31 May), 589 (31 May), 590 (31 May), 591 (31 May), 592 (31 May), 602 (31 May), 604 (31 May), 607 (31 May), 630 (7 June), 645 (14 June), 646 (14 June), 659 (14 June), 673 (21 June), 674 (21 June), 675 (21 June), 678 (21 June), 710 (28 June), 711 (28 June), 714 (28 June), 784 (28 June).
The legislation/substance list in the text (after "New") seems to be in the same order? Let's list the legislation/substance pairs in the order they appear after "New":
That's 25 entries, matching the 25 notifications. Good.
Now the first two entries before "New": "41 of 1935-Corrected copy..." and "16 of 1914-Dental Register." and "do." might correspond to the first two notifications (536, 537). But the notification numbers start at 536. The text before "New" includes "REGULATION,—Continued." which suggests the table continues from a previous page. The first two entries (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914) are likely the first two rows of this page. Then "do." might mean same date? The dates column shows 10th May, 17th May, 16th May, etc. But the notification numbers for the first two are 536 and 537 both 10th May. The third notification is 540 of 17th May. So the first two rows are 536 and 537. The third row (540) corresponds to the first entry after "New"? But the first entry after "New" is "1915-Importation of cargo...". That would be notification 540. But then what about the dates 17th May, 16th May, etc. in the date column? Those might be the dates of the legislation? Or the dates of the gazette? Actually the header "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette" suggests the last column is the notification number and its date. The first column "DATE" might be the date of the legislation? Or the date of the gazette? The header says "DATE." and "(G4)" and "LEGISLATION." and "SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION." and "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette." So there are five columns. The first column "DATE" likely is the date of the gazette (or date of the regulation). The second column "(G4)" might be a code. The third "LEGISLATION." the legislation reference. The fourth "SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION." the description. The fifth "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette." the notification number and date.
In the OCR, the first column has many dates. The second column has "REGULATION,—Continued." and "New" and symbols. The third column has legislation numbers. The fourth column has substances. The fifth column has notification numbers at the end.
But the rows are not aligned. However, we can assume each notification corresponds to a row. The notification numbers are in order. The legislation/substance list after "New" has 25 entries, matching the 25 notifications. The first two entries before "New" (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914) might be the first two rows of the table on this page, but the notification numbers for those are 536 and 537. Then the next 23 entries after "New" correspond to notifications 540 through 784? But there are 25 notifications total, so 2 + 23 = 25. But the list after "New" has 25 entries? I counted 25. Actually I counted 25 entries after "New". Let's recount: from "1915-Importation..." to "1988-Amendments..." that's 25. Plus the two before "New" makes 27. But there are only 25 notifications. So maybe the first two are not separate rows but part of the same list? The "REGULATION,—Continued." might be a header, and the first two entries are actually the first two of the list after "New"? But they appear before "New". The OCR might have misordered.
Look at the date column: it has 10th May, 17th May, 16th May, 22nd May, 30th May, 31st May, 30th May, 23rd May, 31st May, 30th May, 28th May, 11th June, 13th June, 14th June, 19th June, 28th June, 27th June, 24th June. That's 18 dates. The notification dates are: 10 May (two), 17 May (two), 23 May, 31 May (six), 7 June, 14 June (three), 21 June (four), 28 June (four). That's 2+2+1+6+1+3+4+4 = 23? Actually 2+2=4, +1=5, +6=11, +1=12, +3=15, +4=19, +4=23. But we have 25 notifications. Let's count notifications per date:
Total = 2+2+1+8+1+3+4+4 = 25. Good.
The date column in OCR has 18 entries, but some are "do." meaning ditto. The dates listed: 10th May, 17th May, 16th May, 22nd May, 30th May, 31st May, 30th May, 23rd May, 31st May, 30th May, 28th May, 11th June, 13th June, 14th June, 19th June, 28th June, 27th June, 24th June. These might be the dates of the legislation (i.e., the date the regulation was made) not the gazette date. The gazette date is the notification date. The header "DATE." might be the date of the regulation. The "GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette" is the notification number and gazette date.
Thus, each row has: Date (of regulation), (G4), Legislation, Substance, Government Notification (number and gazette date).
We have 25 rows. We need to match each legislation/substance to a regulation date and a notification.
The legislation/substance list in order of appearance (including the two before "New") might be in the same order as the regulation dates? The regulation dates list has 18 entries, but some are "do." meaning same as previous. Let's expand the regulation dates list with "do." resolved:
Given the difficulty, I think the user expects a cleaned-up version of the table as it appears in the source, with corrected OCR errors. Since the source is a table, I should output a Markdown table with the columns as in the header, and fill in the rows as best as possible, using the notification numbers as the last column.
I'll create a table with 25 rows, using the legislation/substance pairs in the order they appear after "New" (25 items) and assign them notification numbers in order. For the first two items (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914), they appear before "New", but they might correspond to the first two notifications (536, 537). However, the list after "New" has 25 items, which would make 27 total. But there are only 25 notifications. So perhaps the first two are actually part of the list after "New"? But they are separated by "REGULATION,—Continued." and "New". Maybe "New" indicates new regulations, and the first two are continued from previous page. But the notification numbers are continuous. The first notification on this page is 536. The previous page might have ended at 535. So the first two entries (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914) are the first two rows on this page. Then "New" might be a subheading for the next set. But then there would be 2 + 25 = 27 rows for 25 notifications. That doesn't match.
Let's check the legislation/substance count after "New" again. I'll copy the text after "New" and split by the pattern "Number of Year-" or "Year-" or "Number of Year—". The text:
"New
1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer
or motor vessel prohibited. 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or- dinance. 1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922. 15 of 1985-Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance.
Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662 authorized for use as a Roman Catholic Cemetery. 21 of 1984-Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance, 1834. Amendment to first schedule under the beading Death Register Offices." 21 of 1939-Resolution extending powers to note-issuing
banks.
13 of 1935-Amendments to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 of the heading "Restaurants and Eating-houses" and the by-laws set forth in the Schedule thereunder.
19 of 1995-Amendment to the by-laws in the Schedule to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading Food Shops.
**
LI
"
15 of 1985-Amendments of the by-laws under the heading Domestia Cleanliness and Prevention of Disease" and sub-heading Restriction of Sale of Certain Food-stuffs set forth in Schedule A to the Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, 1935.
32 of 1989 Amendment to Section 3 (1) (d) of the Com- pulsory Service Ordinance, 1939. 92 of 1939-Amendment to first proviso to section 11 (2)
of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1930. 10 of 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or-
dinance, 1899.
25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons)
(Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940. 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912.
40 of
32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1 of the Hong Kong
Defence Reserve Regulations.
10 of 1939—Amendment to section 15 (1) (i) of the
Volunteer Ordinance, 1998.
18 of 1936–Amendments to rates made under the Tele- communication Ordinance, 1936.
32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915. Prohibition of importation of certain mer- chandise from Macao.
98 of 1999 Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
40 of 1994—Amendments to the Cremation Regulations,
Part I.
88 of 1939-Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
18 of 1930-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1996. Rescission of Government Notification No. 678 published in the Government Gazette of 21st June, 1940.
1902-Resolution made and passed by the Legislative Council under the Tramways Ordinance, 1902.
1988-Amendments to the regulations made under
the Volunteer Ordinance, 1999."
Let's split by the legislation reference pattern: Usually it's "XX of YYYY-" or "YYYY-". But there are also entries without a number like "Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662..." and "1912-Amendments...". The pattern might be that each entry starts with a legislation reference (like "41 of 1935", "16 of 1914", "1915-", "1899-", "15 of 1935", "Kowloon Inland Lot...", "21 of 1934", "21 of 1939", "13 of 1935", "19 of 1935", "15 of 1935", "32 of 1939", "92 of 1939", "10 of 1899", "25 of 1914", "1912-", "40 of 1912?" but it's "40 of" alone, then "32 of 1939", "10 of 1939", "18 of 1936", "32 of 1915", "98 of 1939", "40 of 1934", "88 of 1939", "18 of 1936", "1902-", "1938-").
The "40 of" alone might be "40 of 1912" for the Vehicles and Traffic Regulations. But the text says "25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy... 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912. 40 of 32 of 1939-Amendment..." It could be that "40 of" belongs to the previous entry? Actually "1912-Amendments..." might be the substance, and the legislation reference is "40 of 1912"? But the legislation reference for that entry might be "40 of 1912". However, the OCR has "40 of" on a separate line. Then "32 of 1939" is the next legislation reference.
Given the time, I'll produce a table with the following columns: Date (of Gazette), Legislation, Substance of Regulation, Government Notification. I'll use the notification dates as the Date column (since the header "DATE" might be the date of the gazette). The (G4) column I'll omit or include as "G4" for all rows.
But the instruction says: "Use #, ##, ### for headers found in the original." The original has a header row: "DATE. (G4) LEGISLATION. SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION. GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette." So I should include that as a table header.
I'll create a Markdown table with those five columns. For the (G4) column, the original shows "(G4)" under the header, maybe it's a column with "G4" for each row? Or maybe it's a single cell spanning rows? In the OCR, it's on a separate line. I'll assume it's a column with value "G4" for each row.
Now, I need to populate 25 rows. I'll use the notification numbers and dates for the last column. For the Legislation and Substance, I'll use the 25 entries from the list after "New" (since that yields 25). But the first two entries (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914) are not in that list. However, the notification numbers start at 536. The first two notifications are 536 and 537. The first two entries in the list after "New" are "1915-Importation..." and "1899-Amendment...". That would assign 536 to 1915-Importation, but the date of notification 536 is 10th May. The date column in the original for the first row is "10th May." which matches. The legislation for 536 might be "41 of 1935" but that appears before "New". This is confusing.
Perhaps the table on this page continues from previous page, and the first two rows are the continuation (hence "REGULATION,—Continued."). Then "New" starts new regulations. The notification numbers might not be sequential with the rows? But they are sequential.
Let's look at the date column entries: The first few: "1940. 10th May. REGULATION,—Continued. 41 of 1935... 16 of 1914... do. 17th May. 16th May. 32 of 10 of 22nd May. 30th May. 31st May. 30th May. do. do. 23rd May. 31st May. 30th May. 28th May. 11th June. 13th June. 14th June. do. do. 19th June. do. 28th June. do. 27th June. 24th June."
This looks like the DATE column has multiple entries per row? Actually, the DATE column might have the year 1940, then dates for each regulation. The "REGULATION,—Continued." might be in the (G4) column. Then the LEGISLATION column has "41 of 1935", "16 of 1914", "do.", "32 of", "10 of", etc. The SUBSTANCE column has the descriptions. The NOTIFICATION column has the numbers at the end.
But the OCR has mixed the columns. Given the complexity, I think the best is to output the text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the paragraph structure, but the user asked to reconstruct tabular data using Markdown table syntax. So I must produce a table.
I'll make a judgment: The table has 25 rows corresponding to the 25 government notifications. I'll create rows with the following data:
For each notification, I'll take the legislation/substance from the list in the order they appear in the text after "New", but I'll also include the first two entries (41 of 1935 and 16 of 1914) as the first two rows, and then the next 23 from the list? But the list after "New" has 25 entries. If I take the first two as separate, I have 27. So perhaps the first two are actually the first two of the list after "New"? But they appear before "New". The "New" might be a marker for a new section, but the legislation numbers continue. Let's check the legislation numbers: 41 of 1935, 16 of 1914, then 1915, 1899, 15 of 1935, etc. They are not in numerical order. So it's not a simple sequence.
Given the time, I'll output a table with the 25 notifications and the legislation/substance as they appear in the text in the order of the notification numbers, assuming the text lists them in that order. The text after "New" lists 25 items. The first two items before "New" might be the first two notifications? But the notification numbers for those would be 536 and 537. The first item after "New" is "1915-Importation..." which would then be 540. That leaves 536 and 537 unmatched. However, the date column shows "10th May" for the first row, and "10th May" for the second? Actually the date column has "10th May." then "17th May." then "16th May." etc. The first date is 10th May, second is 17th May? But there are two notifications on 10th May (536, 537). The date column might list the date of the regulation, not the gazette. The first regulation date is 10th May, second is 17th May? But there are two notifications on 10th May. Hmm.
I think I need to make a decision. Since the user is a professional editor, they'd want the table reconstructed as accurately as possible. I'll create a table with the columns: Date, (G4), Legislation, Substance of Regulation, Government Notification and Date of Gazette.
I'll fill the rows by aligning the notification numbers (which are clear) with the legislation/substance entries in the order they appear in the text, but I'll start from the first legislation entry "41 of 1935" as row 1 (notification 536), "16 of 1914" as row 2 (notification 537), then the next legislation entry after "New" is "1915-Importation..." as row 3 (notification 540), "1899-Amendment..." as row 4 (notification 545), "15 of 1935-Public Health..." as row 5 (notification 566), "Kowloon Inland Lot..." as row 6 (notification 580), "21 of 1934-Births..." as row 7 (notification 589), "21 of 1939-Resolution..." as row 8 (notification 590), "13 of 1935-Amendments..." as row 9 (notification 591), "19 of 1935-Amendment..." as row 10 (notification 592), "15 of 1935-Amendments of the by-laws..." as row 11 (notification 602), "32 of 1939-Amendment to Section 3..." as row 12 (notification 604), "92 of 1939-Amendment to first proviso..." as row 13 (notification 607), "10 of 1899-Amendment..." as row 14 (notification 630), "25 of 1914-Trading..." as row 15 (notification 645), "1912-Amendments..." as row 16 (notification 646), "40 of 1912" (assuming) as row 17? But there is "40 of" then "32 of 1939". The next legislation entry is "32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1..." as row 17 (notification 659), "10 of 1939-Amendment to section 15..." as row 18 (notification 673), "18 of 1936-Amendments to rates..." as row 19 (notification 674), "32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation..." as row 20 (notification 675), "98 of 1939-Amendments..." as row 21 (notification 678), "40 of 1934-Amendments to Cremation..." as row 22 (notification 710), "88 of 1939-Amendments..." as row 23 (notification 711), "18 of 1936-Telecommunication Ordinance..." as row 24 (notification 714), "1902-Resolution..." as row 25 (notification 784). That's 25 rows. The "1988-Amendments..." would be extra, but maybe it's part of the last row? Or maybe the last notification 784 corresponds to "1988-Amendments..." and "1902-Resolution..." is extra? But there are 25 notifications, and I have 25 rows if I stop at "1902-Resolution...". The "1988-Amendments..." would be a 26th. But the text ends with "1988-Amendments..." and then "10 of 10 of" and then notifications. The "10 of 10 of" might be stray.
Let's count the legislation entries I just listed: 1.41 of 1935, 2.16 of 1914, 3.1915-Importation, 4.1899-Amendment, 5.15 of 1935, 6.Kowloon, 7.21 of 1934, 8.21 of 1939, 9.13 of 1935, 10.19 of 1935, 11.15 of 1935, 12.32 of 1939, 13.92 of 1939, 14.10 of 1899, 15.25 of 1914, 16.1912-Amendments, 17.32 of 1939 (second), 18.10 of 1939, 19.18 of 1936, 20.32 of 1915, 21.98 of 1939, 22.40 of 1934, 23.88 of 1939, 24.18 of 1936 (second), 25.1902-Resolution. That's 25. The "1988-Amendments" is not included. The "40 of" before "32 of 1939" might be part of the 1912 entry? I'll assume the 1912 entry is "40 of 1912 - Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." But the text says "1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912." So the legislation reference might be "40 of 1912"? However, the pattern "Number of Year" suggests the number is the regulation number. For the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance 1912, the regulations might be numbered. The entry "1912-Amendments..." might be the substance, and the legislation column might be "40 of 1912"? But the OCR has "40 of" on a separate line. I'll combine: Legislation: "40 of 1912", Substance: "Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912."
But then the next legislation is "32 of 1939". That would be row 17. That matches notification 659? Let's see notification order: 630 (7 June), 645 (14 June), 646 (14 June), 659 (14 June), 673 (21 June), 674 (21 June), 675 (21 June), 678 (21 June), 710 (28 June), 711 (28 June), 714 (28 June), 784 (28 June). That's 12 notifications from 630 to 784. My rows 14-25 are 12 rows. Good.
Row 14: notification 630 (7 June) -> legislation 10 of 1899
Row 15: notification 645 (14 June) -> legislation 25 of 1914
Row 16: notification 646 (14 June) -> legislation 40 of 1912 (Vehicles)
Row 17: notification 659 (14 June) -> legislation 32 of 1939 (Defence Reserve)
Row 18: notification 673 (21 June) -> legislation 10 of 1939 (Volunteer)
Row 19: notification 674 (21 June) -> legislation 18 of 1936 (Telecommunication rates)
Row 20: notification 675 (21 June) -> legislation 32 of 1915 (Importation from Macao)
Row 21: notification 678 (21 June) -> legislation 98 of 1939 (Essential Commodities)
Row 22: notification 710 (28 June) -> legislation 40 of 1934 (Cremation)
Row 23: notification 711 (28 June) -> legislation 88 of 1939 (Essential Commodities)
Row 24: notification 714 (28 June) -> legislation 18 of 1936 (Telecommunication rescission)
Row 25: notification 784 (28 June) -> legislation 1902 (Tramways)
That leaves the "1988-Amendments..." unassigned. Maybe it's for notification 784? But 784 is 1902. Could be that the last two are combined? Or the "1988-Amendments..." is actually "1938-Amendments..." and corresponds to notification 784? But the text has both "1902-Resolution..." and "1988-Amendments...". The notification numbers end at 784. There are 25 notifications. I have 25 rows. The "1988-Amendments..." might be a stray or part of the previous. I'll include it as a separate row? But that would be 26. I'll check the notification list: there are 25 numbers. The last is 784. The text after the legislation list has "10 of 10 of" then the notifications. The "10 of 10 of" might be OCR garbage. The legislation list ends with "1988-Amendments...". So there are 26 legislation entries if we count from 41 of 1935 to 1988. But the first two are before "New". Let's count all legislation entries in the entire text:
That's 27. But notifications are 25. So some legislation entries might be sub-items or not separate rows. The "do." entries indicate ditto. The "40 of" might be a continuation of the previous. The "10 of 10 of" at the end is garbage.
Given the difficulty, I'll produce a table with the 25 notifications and the legislation/substance as best matched, and note that the table is reconstructed from OCR. But the instruction says to output only the proofread text in Markdown. I'll output a Markdown table with the columns and rows as I've deduced, correcting OCR errors.
I'll also include the header row as in the original.
Let's construct the Markdown table.
First, the header:
| DATE | (G4) | LEGISLATION | SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION | GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette |
|---|
Then rows. For the (G4) column, I'll put "G4" for all rows, as the original shows "(G4)" under the header, maybe indicating the column header is "(G4)" and the value is "G4"? Or maybe it's a column with no data. I'll put "G4" in each row.
For the DATE column, I'll use the date of the gazette (from the notification date). That seems logical because the last column is "Government Notification and Date of Gazette", which includes the date. But the first column is "DATE." Might be the date of the regulation. However, the notification date is the gazette date. I'll use the gazette date for the DATE column as well, but that would duplicate. The original table likely has the date of the gazette in the first column, and the notification number and date in the last column. But the last column says "and Date of Gazette", so the date is there. The first column might be the date of the regulation (i.e., when the regulation was made). The OCR's first column has many dates. I'll use the dates from the first column of the OCR for each row, but I don't have a clear mapping. Given the ambiguity, I'll use the gazette date (from notification) for the DATE column, and in the last column put the notification number and date.
But the instruction: "Preserve original content — do not add or remove substantive words." So I should keep the original columns. The original has a DATE column. In the OCR, the DATE column includes "1940.", "10th May.", "17th May.", etc. I'll try to assign each row a date from that list in order. The list has 18 entries (with do.). The notifications are 25. Not matching.
Given the time, I'll assume the DATE column is the date of the gazette (same as notification date). I'll use the notification date for DATE column.
Let's create the rows.
I'll write the table in Markdown. I'll correct the legislation years and typos.
Row 1: Date: 10th May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 41 of 1935, Substance: Corrected copy of Part I and Part II of the Register of Medical and Surgical Practitioners qualified to practise medicine and surgery in the Colony, Government Notification: No. 536 of 10th May 1940.
Row 2: Date: 10th May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 16 of 1914, Substance: Dental Register, Government Notification: No. 537 of 10th May 1940.
Row 3: Date: 17th May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 1915 (Importation and Exportation Ordinance), Substance: Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer or motor vessel prohibited, Government Notification: No. 540 of 17th May 1940.
Row 4: Date: 17th May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 1899 (Merchant Shipping Ordinance), Substance: Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922, Government Notification: No. 545 of 17th May 1940.
Row 5: Date: 23rd May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 15 of 1935, Substance: Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, Government Notification: No. 566 of 23rd May 1940.
Row 6: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662, Substance: Authorized for use as a Roman Catholic Cemetery, Government Notification: No. 580 of 31st May 1940.
Row 7: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 21 of 1934, Substance: Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance, 1894. Amendment to first schedule under the heading "Death Register Offices.", Government Notification: No. 589 of 31st May 1940.
Row 8: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 21 of 1939, Substance: Resolution extending powers to note-issuing banks, Government Notification: No. 590 of 31st May 1940.
Row 9: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 13 of 1935, Substance: Amendments to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading "Restaurants and Eating-houses" and the by-laws set forth in the Schedule thereunder, Government Notification: No. 591 of 31st May 1940.
Row 10: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 19 of 1935, Substance: Amendment to the by-laws in the Schedule to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading Food Shops, Government Notification: No. 592 of 31st May 1940.
Row 11: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 15 of 1935, Substance: Amendments of the by-laws under the heading "Domestic Cleanliness and Prevention of Disease" and sub-heading "Restriction of Sale of Certain Food-stuffs" set forth in Schedule A to the Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, 1935, Government Notification: No. 602 of 31st May 1940.
Row 12: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 32 of 1939, Substance: Amendment to Section 3 (1) (d) of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1939, Government Notification: No. 604 of 31st May 1940.
Row 13: Date: 31st May 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 92 of 1939, Substance: Amendment to first proviso to section 11 (2) of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1939, Government Notification: No. 607 of 31st May 1940.
Row 14: Date: 7th June 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 10 of 1899, Substance: Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1899, Government Notification: No. 630 of 7th June 1940.
Row 15: Date: 14th June 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 25 of 1914, Substance: Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons) (Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940, Government Notification: No. 645 of 14th June 1940.
Row 16: Date: 14th June 1940, (G4): G4, Legislation: 40 of 1912, Substance: Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912, Government Notification: No. 646 of 14th June 1940.
Row 17: Date: 14th
20
DATE.
(G4)
LEGISLATION.
SUBSTANCE OF REGULATION.
GOVERNMENT NOTIFICATION and Date of Gazette.
1940.
10th May.
REGULATION,—Continued.
41 of 1935-Corrected copy of Part I and Part II of the Register of Medical and Surgical Practitioners qualified to practise medicine and surgery in the Colony.
16 of 1914-Dental Register.
do.
17th May.
16th May.
32 of
10 of
22nd May.
30th May.
31st May.
30th May.
do.
do.
23rd May.
31st May.
30th May.
28th May.
11th June.
13th June.
14th June.
do.
do.
19th June.
do.
28th June.
do.
27th June.
24th June.
New
1915-Importation of cargo from Canton by steamer
or motor vessel prohibited. 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or- dinance. 1899, and the Merchant Shipping (Aliens Employment) Ordinance, 1922. 15 of 1985-Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance.
Kowloon Inland Lot No. 2662 authorized for use as a Roman Catholic Cemetery. 21 of 1984-Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance, 1834. Amendment to first schedule under the beading Death Register Offices." 21 of 1939-Resolution extending powers to note-issuing
banks.
13 of 1935-Amendments to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 of the heading "Restaurants and Eating-houses" and the by-laws set forth in the Schedule thereunder.
19 of 1995-Amendment to the by-laws in the Schedule to the Public Health (Food) Ordinance, 1935 under the heading Food Shops.
**
LI
"
15 of 1985-Amendments of the by-laws under the heading Domestia Cleanliness and Prevention of Disease" and sub-heading Restriction of Sale of Certain Food-stuffs set forth in Schedule A to the Public Health (Sanitation) Ordinance, 1935.
32 of 1989 Amendment to Section 3 (1) (d) of the Com- pulsory Service Ordinance, 1939. 92 of 1939-Amendment to first proviso to section 11 (2)
of the Compulsory Service Ordinance, 1930. 10 of 1899-Amendment to the Merchant Shipping Or-
dinance, 1899.
25 of 1914-Trading with the Enemy (Specified Persons)
(Amendment) (No. 6) Order, 1940. 1912-Amendments to the regulations made under the Vehicles and Traffic Regulation Ordinance, 1912.
40 of
32 of 1939-Amendment to regulation 1 of the Hong Kong
Defence Reserve Regulations.
10 of 1939—Amendment to section 15 (1) (i) of the
Volunteer Ordinance, 1998.
18 of 1936–Amendments to rates made under the Tele- communication Ordinance, 1936.
32 of 1915-Importation and Exportation Ordinance, 1915. Prohibition of importation of certain mer- chandise from Macao.
98 of 1999 Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
40 of 1994—Amendments to the Cremation Regulations,
Part I.
88 of 1939-Amendments to the Essential Commodities
Reserves Regulations.
18 of 1930-Telecommunication Ordinance, 1996. Rescission of Government Notification No. 678 published in the Government Gazette of 21st June, 1940. 1902-Resolution made and passed by the Legislative Council under the Tramways Ordinance, 1902. 1988-Amendments to the regulations made under
the Volunteer Ordinance, 1999.
10 of
10 of
No. 536 of 10th
May.
No. 537 of 10th
May.
No. 540 of 17th
May.
No. 545 of 17th
May.
No. 566 of 23rd
May.
No. 580 of 31st
May.
No. 589 of 31st
May.
No. 590 of 31st
May.
No. 591 of 31st
May.
No. 592 of 31st
May.
No. 602 of 31st
May.
No. 604 of 31st
May.
No. 607 of 31st
May.
No. 630 of 7th
June.
No. 645 of 14th
June.
No. 646 of 14th
June.
No. 659 of 14th
June.
No. 673 of 21st
June.
No. 874 of 31st
June.
No. 675 of 21st
June.
No. 678 of 21st
June.
No. 710 of 28th
June.
No. 711 of 28th
June.
No. 714 of 28th
June.
No. 784 of 28th
June.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.