The OCR text appears to be a table of personnel records, likely from a Hong Kong government document (given C.S.O. references). The data is jumbled: names, dates, file references, salaries, allowances, and remarks are all mixed up. I need to reconstruct the table properly.
First, let's identify the columns. From the header fragments: "(J 181 )" might be a page or reference number. Then "Do.," likely stands for "Ditto" or a column header. The names: Thomas Heury William King (probably Henry), Henry George Stevens, George Frost, Stanley George Poole, Arthur Williams Thomas White, Albert George Martin, William Hedley Whittaker, Arthur Foster, William Fogwill, George William Gnun (probably Gunn), James Ivor Barnes, Thomas Storey Clark.
Each entry has a number in parentheses: (1), (1)(4), (b), etc. These likely correspond to the remarks codes (1)-(6).
Dates: 15th August 1927, 1st October 1927, 24th October 1927, 29th October 1927, 18th February 1928, 7th March 1928, 15th May 1928, 29th May 1928, 21st June 1928, 29th June 1928, 20th July 1928, 23rd July 1928.
File references: C.S.O. 4192 of 1927, C.S.O. 4200 of 1927, C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927 (maybe C.S.O. 4020?), C.S.O. 4189 of 1927, C.N.O. 4705 of 1928 (probably C.S.O.), C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927, C.S.O. 4720 of 1928, C.S.O. 4724 of 1928, C.F.0 4726 of 1928 (C.S.O.), C.N.O. 4748 of 1928, C.S.O. 4751 of 1928, C.S.O. 4752 of 1928.
Salaries: 310, 330, 350, 300, etc. Appear in the text: 310, 330, 350, 300, 330, 350, 310, 330, 350, 300, 330, 350.
Allowances: Various combinations of Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, Rent Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, Language Allowance (Cantonese). Amounts: $120, $180, $360, $600, $60, $300, $240, $1,200.
Periods: "9 months and 19 days", "7 months and 24 days", "8 months and 8 days", "6 months and 28 days", "7 months and 10 days", "6 months and 27 days", "1 month and 26 days". These likely correspond to leave or acting periods.
Remarks at bottom: (1) Certificate of the Royal Sanitary Institute for Sanitary Inspectors, (2) Certificate of the Royal Sanitary Institute for Meat and Foods, (3) Certificate of the Liverpool University School of Hygiene for Meat and Foods, (4) Certificate in Sanitary Science of the Royal Sanitary Institute, (5) Promoted 1st Class Inspector 1st March, (6) Seconded as Custodian, Government House 20th November to 31st December.
Also "* Uniform." at end.
The OCR has scrambled the rows. I need to align each person with their data. Let's list the names in order as they appear:
Each has a code: (1), (1), (1), (1), (1), (1), (1)(4), (1), (b), (1)(4), (1)(4), (1). Note: William Fogwill has (b) maybe a typo for (1)? Or maybe (6)? But remarks only go to (6). Could be (1) but OCR misread. We'll keep as (b) but maybe it's (1). However, the remarks list doesn't have (b). Might be a footnote. We'll preserve as (b).
Now, the dates appear in two sequences: first a list of dates after each name? Actually the OCR shows:
Do., Thomas Heury William King. (1) 15th Angust, 1927. C.S.O. 4192 of 1927. 310
Do., Henry George Stevens. (1) 1st October, 1927. C.S.O. 4200 of 1927. 330? Wait after Stevens it says "330" but then "Do.. George Frost. (1) 24th October, 1927. C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927." Then "Do.. Stanley George Poole, (1) 29th October, 1927. C 8.0. 4189 of 1927." Then "Do.. Arthur Williams Thomas White. (1). 18th February, 1928. C.N.O. 4705 of 1928." Then "Do., Albert George Martin. (1) 7th March, 1928. C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927." Then "Do, William Hedley Whittaker. (1)(4) 15th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4720 of 1928. 330" Then "Don Arthur Foster. (1) 29th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4724 of 1928 330" Then "Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Langunge Allowance (Cantonese)." That seems to be allowances for Foster? Then "Do.. William Fogwill. (b) 21st June, 1928. C.F.0 4726 of 1928, 310" Then "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." Then "Do., George William Gnun, (1)(4) 29th June, 1928. C.N.O. 4748 of 1928. 350" Then "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300" Then a bunch of allowances and periods.
It seems the table has columns: Name, Code, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Period (maybe leave), Remarks code.
But the allowances and periods are listed separately at the bottom in a jumbled order. We need to match each person to their allowances and period.
Let's parse the allowances block:
"Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"$600 Rent Allowance, $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)."
"$600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Conveyance Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"9 months and 19 days."
"7 months and 24 days."
"330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
"350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance."
"Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)"
"8 months and 8 days."
"6 months and 28 days."
"7 months and 10 days."
"15th August, 1927."
"1st October, 1927."
"24th October, 1927."
"29th October, 1927."
"18th February, 1928."
"7th March, 1928."
"15th May, 1928."
"29th May, 1928."
"21st June, 1928."
"29th June, 1928."
"6 months and 27 days."
"20th July, 1928."
"1 month and 26 days."
"23rd July, 1928."
This is messy. It appears the OCR has interleaved multiple columns. The dates at the end seem to be the appointment dates again. The periods (months and days) likely correspond to each person's leave or acting period.
We have 12 persons. There are 12 appointment dates. There are 12 salary entries (310, 330, 350, 300, etc.) but they appear mixed.
Let's try to reconstruct the table by aligning each person with the data that follows them in the OCR.
From the initial sequence:
"Do..
Henry George Stevens.
(1)
1st October,
1927.
C.S.O. 4200 of 1927.
330
Do..
George Frost.
(1)
24th October,
1927.
C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927."
So after Stevens, there is "330" on its own line. That likely is Stevens' salary. Then "Do.. George Frost." So Frost's salary not shown yet. Then after Frost's file reference, next line "Do.. Stanley George Poole, (1) 29th October, 1927. C 8.0. 4189 of 1927." No salary. Then "Do.. Arthur Williams Thomas White. (1). 18th February, 1928. C.N.O. 4705 of 1928." No salary. Then "Do., Albert George Martin. (1) 7th March, 1928. C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927." No salary. Then "Do, William Hedley Whittaker. (1)(4) 15th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4720 of 1928. 330" So Whittaker salary 330. Then "Don Arthur Foster. (1) 29th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4724 of 1928 330" Foster salary 330. Then allowances line. Then "Do.. William Fogwill. (b) 21st June, 1928. C.F.0 4726 of 1928, 310" Fogwill salary 310. Then allowances line. Then "Do., George William Gnun, (1)(4) 29th June, 1928. C.N.O. 4748 of 1928. 350" Gunn salary 350. Then "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300" Here two names: James Ivor Barnes and Thomas Storey Clark. Barnes has code (1)(4)? Actually it says "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300". So Barnes date 20th July, file C.S.O. 4751, Clark date 23rd July, file C.S.O. 4752. Salary 300 for both? Or maybe 300 for Clark? The "300" at end likely applies to Clark. Barnes salary not shown.
Now we have salaries for: King 310, Stevens 330, Whittaker 330, Foster 330, Fogwill 310, Gunn 350, Clark 300. Missing: Frost, Poole, White, Martin, Barnes.
Now the allowances block: there are 12 allowances entries? Let's count distinct allowance lines:
That's 10 allowance entries. But we have 12 persons. However, some lines have salary prefixes (330, 350) which might indicate they belong to persons with those salaries. Also there are periods: 9 months and 19 days, 7 months and 24 days, 8 months and 8 days, 6 months and 28 days, 7 months and 10 days, 6 months and 27 days, 1 month and 26 days. That's 7 periods. Not 12.
Maybe the table originally had columns: Name, Grade/Code, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave (period), Remarks. The OCR has scrambled the columns.
Given the complexity, perhaps the best is to present the data as a list of records for each person, with the information we can confidently assign, and note the allowances and periods as separate lists? But the instruction says to reconstruct tables using Markdown table syntax if data is clearly in table format. This is clearly a table but OCR has mangled it. We need to do our best to reconstruct the table rows.
Let's try to match each person to allowances and periods by order. The persons appear in order. The allowances appear in a block after Foster and Fogwill and Gunn. The periods appear after that. The dates at the end repeat the appointment dates. Perhaps the original table had two pages? The "(J 181 )" at top might be a page number.
Another approach: The text might be from a "List of Officers" or "Sanitary Inspectors" list. The remarks refer to Sanitary Inspectors certificates. So these are Sanitary Inspectors. The columns likely: Name, Certificate (code), Date of Appointment, Authority (C.S.O. number), Salary, Allowances, Leave taken, Remarks.
Given the OCR, we can try to create a table with columns: Name, Certificate, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks Code.
We'll assign allowances and leave periods in the order they appear after the list of names? But the allowances block starts after Foster (5th person) with "Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." That might be for Foster? Then next allowance for Fogwill? Then for Gunn? Then for Barnes and Clark? But there are 10 allowances for 12 persons.
Let's list persons in order with known data:
Now allowances in order of appearance:
A1: Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese). (after Foster)
A2: Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese). (after Fogwill)
A3: Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese). (after Gunn? Actually after Gunn's salary 350, then "Do., James Ivor Barnes..." then allowances? Let's see sequence: After Gunn: "350 Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300 Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Can- touese). 310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese). Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese). $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese). 330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Con- veysoce Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese). 350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- lonese). 9 montba and 19 days. 7 months and 24 days. 330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese). 350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance. Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.) 8 months and 8 days. 6 months and 28 days. 7 months and 10 days."
This is a mess. It seems the allowances and periods are interleaved with salary numbers. The salary numbers (310, 330, 350) appear as prefixes to some allowance lines. That suggests each allowance line is associated with a salary grade. For example, "310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." That would be for a person with salary 310. Which persons have salary 310? King and Fogwill. King is first, Fogwill is 9th. "330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Conveyance Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." Salary 330: Stevens, Whittaker, Foster. "350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." Salary 350: Gunn. "330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." Another 330. "350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance." Two 350 entries? Maybe for Gunn and another? But only Gunn has 350. "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)" no salary prefix.
Also there are lines without salary prefix: "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." "Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." "$600 Rent Allowance, $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." "$600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)."
And periods: "9 months and 19 days." "7 months and 24 days." "8 months and 8 days." "6 months and 28 days." "7 months and 10 days." "6 months and 27 days." "1 month and 26 days."
The dates at the end: "15th August, 1927. 1st October, 1927. 24th October, 1927. 29th October, 1927. 18th February, 1928. 7th March, 1928. 15th May, 1928. 29th May, 1928. 21st June, 1928. 29th June, 1928. 6 months and 27 days. 20th July, 1928. 1 month and 26 days. 23rd July, 1928." This looks like the appointment dates repeated, with two periods inserted: "6 months and 27 days" after 29th June, and "1 month and 26 days" after 20th July.
Given the difficulty, perhaps the best is to output the data as a structured list for each person, including all known fields, and for allowances and leave periods, include them as separate columns but note they are not perfectly aligned. However, the instruction says to reconstruct tables using Markdown table syntax if data is clearly in table format. This is clearly a table, but the OCR has broken it. We must do our best to reconstruct the table rows as they would appear in the original.
Let's assume the original table had 12 rows and columns: Name, Certificate, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks.
We can try to match allowances and leave periods by order of appearance in the OCR after the list of names. The allowances block starts after Foster (8th person) but actually after Foster's salary line, there is an allowance line. Then after Fogwill's salary line, another allowance line. Then after Gunn's salary line, a bunch of allowance lines. Then periods. Then dates again.
Maybe the original table was split across pages, and the OCR read columns vertically? For example, the left column: names, codes, dates, file refs. The right column: salaries, allowances, leave periods. The OCR read left column top to bottom, then right column top to bottom. That would explain why all names appear first, then salaries, then allowances, then periods.
Look at the OCR: It starts with "(J 181 )" then "Do., Thomas Heury William King. (1) 15th Angust, 1927. C.S.O. 4192 of 1927. 310" That includes salary 310 at end. Then "Do.. Henry George Stevens. (1) 1st October, 1927. C.S.O. 4200 of 1927. 330" includes salary 330. Then "Do.. George Frost. (1) 24th October, 1927. C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927." no salary. Then "Do.. Stanley George Poole, (1) 29th October, 1927. C 8.0. 4189 of 1927." no salary. Then "Do.. Arthur Williams Thomas White. (1). 18th February, 1928. C.N.O. 4705 of 1928." no salary. Then "Do., Albert George Martin. (1) 7th March, 1928. C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927." no salary. Then "Do, William Hedley Whittaker. (1)(4) 15th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4720 of 1928. 330" salary 330. Then "Don Arthur Foster. (1) 29th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4724 of 1928 330" salary 330. Then "Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Langunge Allowance (Cantonese)." This is an allowance line. Then "Do.. William Fogwill. (b) 21st June, 1928. C.F.0 4726 of 1928, 310" salary 310. Then "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." allowance. Then "Do., George William Gnun, (1)(4) 29th June, 1928. C.N.O. 4748 of 1928. 350" salary 350. Then "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300" salary 300 for Clark. Then a block of allowances and periods.
So the first 10 entries have salaries embedded. The last two (Barnes and Clark) have only Clark's salary. Then the allowances block seems to continue for all 12? But there are many allowance lines.
Perhaps the allowances block is actually the "Allowances" column for each person, but the OCR has wrapped them. Let's count allowance lines that are not prefixed with salary:
That's 7 lines. Plus the salary-prefixed ones:
That's 12 allowance entries! Good. So there are 12 allowance entries, one per person. The salary-prefixed ones correspond to persons with those salaries. The non-prefixed ones correspond to persons whose salaries not shown in the prefix? But we have salaries for all except Frost, Poole, White, Martin, Barnes. However, the non-prefixed ones are 7, and we have 5 persons without salary in the list? Actually we have salaries for King (310), Stevens (330), Whittaker (330), Foster (330), Fogwill (310), Gunn (350), Clark (300). That's 7 salaries known. The remaining 5: Frost, Poole, White, Martin, Barnes. But there are 7 non-prefixed allowance lines. However, two of the non-prefixed lines have "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." and "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)" Maybe these are for Barnes and Clark? But Clark has salary 300 and a prefixed allowance? Actually Clark's salary 300 appears at end of his entry, but no allowance prefix 300. The prefixed allowances are for 310, 330, 350. No 300. So Clark's allowance might be non-prefixed.
Let's list persons in order and assign allowance lines in the order they appear in the OCR after the list? The allowance lines appear in two groups: first two after Foster and Fogwill, then a big block after Clark. The order in the OCR:
After Foster: "Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Langunge Allowance (Cantonese)." (A1)
After Fogwill: "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." (A2)
After Gunn: (then Barnes and Clark entries) then "* Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Can- touese)." (A3)
Then "310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." (A4)
Then "Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." (A5)
Then "$600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." (A6)
Then "$600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." (A7)
Then "330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Con- veysoce Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." (A8)
Then "350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- lonese)." (A9)
Then "9 montba and 19 days." (period)
Then "7 months and 24 days." (period)
Then "* 330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." (A10)
Then "350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance." (A11)
Then "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)" (A12)
Then periods: "8 months and 8 days." "6 months and 28 days." "7 months and 10 days."
Then dates again.
So there are 12 allowance entries (A1-A12). They likely correspond to the 12 persons in order. Let's assign:
Maybe the original table had multiple sections? The "(J 181 )" might be a page number. The text might be from a "Blue Book" or "Civil List".
Given the time, I think the best is to produce a Markdown table with the information we have, aligning each person with their known data, and for allowances and leave periods, include them as separate columns but note that the mapping is uncertain. However, the instruction says to reconstruct the table. We must do our best.
Let's assume the allowances list (A1-A12) corresponds to the 12 persons in the order they appear in the name list. The name list order is as above. The allowances list order as they appear in the OCR after the names? But the allowances appear interleaved. However, if we consider the OCR read the table row by row, but the allowances column had line breaks, the OCR might have captured them in a different order.
Another idea: The text might be a list of appointments with allowances, and the "Do." means "Ditto" for the post "Sanitary Inspector". The columns: Name, Certificate, Date, Authority, Salary, Allowances, Period of Leave, Remarks. The OCR has merged the allowances and periods into a block at the end. The dates at the end are the appointment dates repeated. The periods are leave periods.
Look at the periods: there are 7 periods listed in the block, and then two more in the date list: "6 months and 27 days" and "1 month and 26 days". That totals 9 periods. But 12 persons. Maybe only some took leave.
The remarks codes (1)-(6) are at the bottom. Each person has a code in parentheses. That matches.
Given the difficulty, I will create a table with columns: Name, Certificate(s), Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks Code. I will fill in the data as per the sequence, matching allowances and leave periods by the order they appear in the OCR after the list of names, but I need to decide a consistent mapping.
Let's list the persons in the order they appear in the OCR (which is likely the original order). Then list the allowance entries in the order they appear in the OCR after the last name? But the allowances start appearing before the last names. Actually, the first allowance appears after Foster (8th person). The second after Fogwill (9th). Then after Gunn (10th), we get a block of allowances. Then after Clark (12th), we get more allowances and periods. So the allowances for the first 7 persons might be in the block after Clark? But the block after Clark includes many allowances.
Let's count the allowance entries in the block after Clark (starting from "* Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance..."):
That's 10 entries. Plus the two earlier (A1, A2) = 12. So the 12 allowances are: A1, A2, then the 10 from the block. If we assume they correspond to persons 1-12 in order, then:
Person 1 (King) -> A1: Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 2 (Stevens) -> A2: Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 3 (Frost) -> Block1: Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 4 (Poole) -> Block2: 310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 5 (White) -> Block3: Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 6 (Martin) -> Block4: $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 7 (Whittaker) -> Block5: $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 8 (Foster) -> Block6: 330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Conveyance Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 9 (Fogwill) -> Block7: 350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 10 (Gunn) -> Block8: 330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
Person 11 (Barnes) -> Block9: 350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance.
Person 12 (Clark) -> Block10: Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)
But this mapping seems arbitrary. However, note that the salary prefixes in the block match some persons' salaries: Block2 has 310 prefix, King and Fogwill have 310. King is person1, Fogwill person9. Block2 assigned to person4 (Poole) who has unknown salary. Block6 has 330 prefix, matches Stevens, Whittaker, Foster (persons2,7,8). Block6 assigned to person8 (Foster) - good. Block7 has 350 prefix, matches Gunn (person10). Block7 assigned to person9 (Fogwill) who has 310 - mismatch. Block8 has 330 prefix, assigned to person10 (Gunn) who has 350 - mismatch. Block9 has 350 prefix, assigned to person11 (Barnes) unknown salary. Block10 no prefix.
This mapping is not consistent.
Maybe the allowances are grouped by salary grade. The original table might have been sorted by salary. But the names are in appointment date order.
Given the complexity, perhaps the best is to present the data as a list of records for each person, with the allowances and leave periods as separate bullet points, but the instruction says to use Markdown table syntax for tabular data. I think we must produce a table with the columns we can discern, and for allowances and leave periods, we can include the raw text blocks as they appear, or leave blank.
But the user expects a proofread text. The OCR text is a jumble. The proofread text should be a cleaned-up version of the same content, preserving the structure. Since the original is a table, we should output a Markdown table.
Let's try to reconstruct the table as it might have been: each row has: Name, Certificate, Date, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave, Remarks.
We have 12 rows. We'll fill in the known data. For allowances and leave, we'll use the allowance lines and period lines in the order they appear in the OCR after the list of names? But the periods appear after the allowances block. There are 7 periods in the block, then 2 in the date list. That's 9 periods. Maybe only 9 persons have leave periods. We'll assign them in order of persons.
Let's list the periods in order of appearance in OCR:
That's 7 periods. The date list also includes the appointment dates again, but those are not periods.
So 7 periods for 12 persons. Maybe the first 7 persons have leave periods? Or the ones with certain codes.
Given the uncertainty, I will create a table with the data we have, and for allowances and leave, I will include the text as a combined field, but that's not ideal.
Alternatively, I could output the text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the paragraph structure. The OCR has no paragraphs; it's a list. The instruction says to preserve paragraph breaks. The original might have been a table, but if we treat each row as a paragraph? Not sure.
Given the instruction: "Return the proofread text in standard Markdown: Use #, ##, ### for headers found in the original. Use bold for labels, titles, and emphasized text. Use Markdown table syntax to reconstruct tabular data."
Thus, we must use a table.
I will create a table with the following columns: Name, Certificate, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks Code.
I will populate the rows in the order of the names as they appear. For allowances, I will use the allowance lines in the order they appear in the OCR after the list of names? But the allowances are interleaved. I'll instead use the allowance lines from the block that seems to be the allowances column, but I need to decide which allowance belongs to which person.
Let's look at the OCR again. The first part lists names with some salaries. Then after Foster, there is an allowance line. After Fogwill, another. After Gunn, a block. It's possible that the allowances for the first 8 persons are given in the block after Gunn? But the first two allowances appear before Gunn.
Maybe the original table had two columns: left column with names, certificates, dates, file refs; right column with salaries, allowances, leave periods. The OCR read the left column down to Foster, then switched to right column for Foster? That doesn't make sense.
Another possibility: The text is from a "List of Officers" where each entry is a paragraph. But the OCR has merged them.
Given the time, I will produce a table with the data I can extract, and for allowances and leave periods, I will put the raw text segments in the order they appear, but aligned by row index as best as possible. I'll note that the mapping is approximate.
But the instruction says "Preserve original content — do not add or remove substantive words. Do not rephrase, rewrite, or change the author's style, tone, or word choice. Only correct what is clearly wrong." So I should not invent mappings. I should present the text as it is, but with corrected line breaks and spelling.
Perhaps the best is to output the text as a series of paragraphs, each representing a row, with the data concatenated. But the instruction says to use Markdown table syntax for tabular data. Since the original is tabular, I must use a table.
I'll create a table with the columns as they appear in the OCR: The OCR shows for each entry: "Do., Name. (code) Date. File Reference. Salary" then later allowances and periods. But the allowances and periods are not aligned.
Let's try to parse the OCR as a single table with rows separated by "Do." lines. The "Do." likely indicates a new row. The first line "(J 181 )" might be a header. Then "Do., Thomas Heury William King. (1) 15th Angust, 1927. C.S.O. 4192 of 1927. 310" That's one row. Then "Do.. Henry George Stevens. (1) 1st October, 1927. C.S.O. 4200 of 1927. 330" second row. Then "Do.. George Frost. (1) 24th October, 1927. C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927." third row (no salary). Then "Do.. Stanley George Poole, (1) 29th October, 1927. C 8.0. 4189 of 1927." fourth row. Then "Do.. Arthur Williams Thomas White. (1). 18th February, 1928. C.N.O. 4705 of 1928." fifth row. Then "Do., Albert George Martin. (1) 7th March, 1928. C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927." sixth row. Then "Do, William Hedley Whittaker. (1)(4) 15th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4720 of 1928. 330" seventh row. Then "Don Arthur Foster. (1) 29th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4724 of 1928 330" eighth row. Then "Do.. William Fogwill. (b) 21st June, 1928. C.F.0 4726 of 1928, 310" ninth row. Then "Do., George William Gnun, (1)(4) 29th June, 1928. C.N.O. 4748 of 1928. 350" tenth row. Then "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300" This line contains two rows: Barnes and Clark.
So we have 12 rows. The allowances and periods are not in these rows. They appear after. In the original table, there might be additional columns for allowances and leave that the OCR placed at the end. The remarks are at the bottom.
Thus, the proofread text should include the table with all columns. Since the allowances and leave periods are separate, we need to incorporate them. But we don't know which allowance belongs to which row. However, the OCR might have captured the table in a way that the allowances column was read after the main columns. If we assume the table had 8 columns: Name, Certificate, Date, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks. The OCR read columns 1-5 for all rows, then column 6 for all rows, then column 7 for all rows, then column 8 (remarks) at the end. That would explain the structure: first block (names, certificates, dates, file refs, salaries), then allowances block, then leave periods block, then remarks.
Let's test: The first block has 12 rows with 5 fields each (though some missing salary). The allowances block has 12 entries (as we counted). The leave periods block has 7 entries (maybe only 7 rows have leave). The remarks block has 6 codes.
If that's the case, then the allowances list in order corresponds to rows 1-12. The leave periods list in order corresponds to rows 1-7 (or some subset). The remarks codes are referenced by the certificate codes in each row.
Thus, we can reconstruct the table by taking the first block as rows 1-12, then assign allowances from the allowances block in order, leave periods from leave block in order (for first 7 rows), and remarks codes from the certificate codes.
Let's extract the first block rows clearly:
Row1: Name: Thomas Heury William King, Certificate: (1), Date: 15th August, 1927, File Ref: C.S.O. 4192 of 1927, Salary: 310
Row2: Name: Henry George Stevens, Certificate: (1), Date: 1st October, 1927, File Ref: C.S.O. 4200 of 1927, Salary: 330
Row3: Name: George Frost, Certificate: (1), Date: 24th October, 1927, File Ref: C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927, Salary: (missing)
Row4: Name: Stanley George Poole, Certificate: (1), Date: 29th October, 1927, File Ref: C.S.O. 4189 of 1927, Salary: (missing)
Row5: Name: Arthur Williams Thomas White, Certificate: (1), Date: 18th February, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4705 of 1928, Salary: (missing)
Row6: Name: Albert George Martin, Certificate: (1), Date: 7th March, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927, Salary: (missing)
Row7: Name: William Hedley Whittaker, Certificate: (1)(4), Date: 15th May, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4720 of 1928, Salary: 330
Row8: Name: Arthur Foster, Certificate: (1), Date: 29th May, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4724 of 1928, Salary: 330
Row9: Name: William Fogwill, Certificate: (b), Date: 21st June, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4726 of 1928, Salary: 310
Row10: Name: George William Gnun, Certificate: (1)(4), Date: 29th June, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4748 of 1928, Salary: 350
Row11: Name: James Ivor Barnes, Certificate: (1)(4)?, Date: 20th July, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4751 of 1928, Salary: (missing)
Row12: Name: Thomas Storey Clark, Certificate: (1), Date: 23rd July, 1928, File Ref: C.S.O. 4752 of 1928, Salary: 300
Now allowances block (12 entries in order of appearance in OCR after the first block? But the allowances block starts after row8? Actually in the OCR, after row8 (Foster) there is an allowance line, then row9 (Fogwill), then allowance line, then row10 (Gunn), then row11 and 12, then a big block of allowances. So the allowances are not all after the first block; they are interleaved. However, if the OCR read column by column, it would read all of column1 (names), then column2 (certificates), etc. But the text shows names with certificates, dates, file refs, salaries all together for each row. That suggests the OCR read row by row for the first few columns, then the remaining columns were read later.
Given the interleaving, maybe the table had a multi-line cell for allowances? Not sure.
Given the time, I will assume the allowances block that appears after row12 (the big block) contains the allowances for all 12 rows, in order. The two earlier allowance lines (after Foster and Fogwill) might be part of that block but got placed early due to OCR error. In the big block, there are 10 entries. Plus the two early ones = 12. The order in the OCR: first early allowance (after Foster), second early allowance (after Fogwill), then the big block entries. If we take that as the sequence for rows 1-12, then:
Row1 allowance: first early allowance? But that appears after row8. That would be row8's allowance? Hmm.
Let's look at the big block: it starts with " Free Quarters, Fuel and Light, $360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Can- touese)." Then "310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." Then "Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." Then "$600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese)." Then "$600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese)." Then "330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Con- veysoce Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." Then "350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- lonese)." Then "9 montba and 19 days." (this is a leave period) Then "7 months and 24 days." (leave) Then " 330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese)." Then "350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance." Then "Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Allowance Language (Cantonese.)" Then leave periods: "8 months and 8 days." "6 months and 28 days." "7 months and 10 days."
The big block includes leave periods interspersed. So the allowances and leave periods are mixed.
This is too messy. Given the constraints, I will output a cleaned-up version of the text as a Markdown table with the rows as per the first block, and for allowances and leave, I will include the raw text from the allowances/leave block as a single cell per row, but that would be inaccurate.
Perhaps the best is to output the text as a series of paragraphs, each representing a row, with the data combined, and then the remarks at the end. But the instruction says to use Markdown table syntax for tabular data. I'll create a table with the columns: Name, Certificate, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks. I'll fill in the allowances and leave periods from the block in the order they appear, assigning them to rows 1-12 for allowances and rows 1-7 for leave periods. This is a guess but it's the best we can do.
Let's list the allowances in the order they appear in the OCR from the beginning of the allowances section. The allowances section seems to start after Foster? But there is an allowance line after Foster, then after Fogwill, then after Gunn, then a block. To get a sequence of 12, I'll take all allowance lines in the order they appear in the OCR text (from top to bottom). Let's scan the OCR text sequentially and pick out lines that look like allowances.
The OCR text lines (as given in the prompt) are:
Now, the allowance lines are at lines 50, 58, 77-78, 79-80, 81, 82, 83-84, 85-86, 90-91, 92-93, 94-97. That's 11 entries? Let's count:
That's 11 allowance entries. But we have 12 persons. Maybe one person has no allowance? Or the line "310" at line79 is a salary prefix for the allowance at line80, but line79 is just "310". Actually line79 is "310" and line80 is the allowance. So that's one entry with salary prefix. Similarly line83 "330" and line84 allowance. Line85 "350" and line86 allowance. Line90 "330" and line91 allowance. Line92 "350" and line93 allowance. So those are 5 entries with salary prefixes. The others are without. Total 11. We need 12. Perhaps the allowance for the first person (King) is missing? Or the line "310" at line7 is his salary, and his allowance is not listed separately? But the table likely had allowances for all.
Notice that line50 appears after Foster (row8). Line58 after Fogwill (row9). Then the block after Clark (row12) has 9 entries (3-11). That totals 11. Row10 (Gunn) and row11 (Barnes) and row12 (Clark) are in the block. Row1-7 allowances might be in the block? But the block starts with line77 which is after Clark. So the block likely contains allowances for rows 1-12? But there are only 9 entries in block plus 2 earlier =11. Hmm.
Maybe the allowance for row10 (Gunn) is line64? But line64 is "350" which is his salary. No allowance line after him until the block.
Given the difficulty, I will assume the allowances for each row are given in the block in order of rows 1-12, but the block has 11 entries. Perhaps the first entry in the block (line77-78) is for row1, then line79-80 for row2, line81 for row3, line82 for row4, line83-84 for row5, line85-86 for row6, line90-91 for row7, line92-93 for row8, line94-97 for row9, and the two early ones (line50, line58) for row10 and row11? That would be 11. Row12 missing.
This is too speculative.
Given the instructions, I think the best is to output the text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the line breaks as paragraphs? But the instruction says to reconstruct sentences and paragraphs. The OCR text is not sentences; it's a table. The primary task is to reconstruct sentences and paragraphs. But there are no sentences. So perhaps the original document is a list of appointments with allowances, and the OCR has broken the lines. We should join the lines that belong together.
For example, each "Do." entry might be a paragraph. But the allowances are separate paragraphs.
I'll try to reconstruct the text as a list of entries, each entry containing the name, certificate, date, file reference, salary, allowances, leave period, and remarks code. I'll use the data from the OCR in the order it appears, grouping related lines.
Let's group by the "Do." markers. The "Do." appears at lines 2, 8, 15, 21, 27, 32, 38, 44, 51, 59, 65, 67. That's 12 "Do." lines. Each "Do." likely starts a new entry. The first "Do." at line2 is before King. So entries:
Entry1: lines2-7: Do., Thomas Heury William King. (1) 15th Angust, 1927. C.S.O. 4192 of 1927. 310
Entry2: lines8-14: Do.. Henry George Stevens. (1) 1st October, 1927. C.S.O. 4200 of 1927. 330
Entry3: lines15-20: Do.. George Frost. (1) 24th October, 1927. C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927.
Entry4: lines21-26: Do.. Stanley George Poole, (1) 29th October, 1927. C 8.0. 4189 of 1927.
Entry5: lines27-31: Do.. Arthur Williams Thomas White. (1). 18th February, 1928. C.N.O. 4705 of 1928.
Entry6: lines32-37: Do., Albert George Martin. (1) 7th March, 1928. C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927.
Entry7: lines38-43: Do, William Hedley Whittaker. (1)(4) 15th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4720 of 1928. 330
Entry8: lines44-49: Don Arthur Foster. (1) 29th May, 1928. C.S.O. 4724 of 1928 330
Entry9: lines51-57: Do.. William Fogwill. (b) 21st June, 1928. C.F.0 4726 of 1928, 310
Entry10: lines59-64: Do., George William Gnun, (1)(4) 29th June, 1928. C.N.O. 4748 of 1928. 350
Entry11: lines65-70: Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. (maybe certificate?) Then "Do., Thomas Storey Clark." appears at line67, but that's another "Do."? Actually line65: "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1." line66: "Do.," line67: "Thomas Storey Clark." line68: "(1)(4)" line69: "(1)" line70: "20th July, 1928." This is messy. It seems two entries merged: Barnes and Clark. The "Do." at line65 for Barnes, then another "Do." at line66 for Clark. So entry11: Barnes, entry12: Clark.
But the text after line64: "Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1)(4) (1) 20th July, 1928. C.8.0. 4751 of 1928, 23rd July, 1928. C.3.0. 4752 of 1928. 300" So we can split:
Entry11: Do., James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1. (1)(4) 20th July, 1928. C.S.O. 4751 of 1928. (salary not given)
Entry12: Do., Thomas Storey Clark. (1) 23rd July, 1928. C.S.O. 4752 of 1928. 300
Now after that, we have allowances and leave periods and remarks. These are not part of the entries. They might be separate sections.
The remarks at the end are clearly a separate section.
The allowances and leave periods might be a separate table or list. But the instruction says to reconstruct tabular data. Perhaps the whole thing is one table with multiple columns. The "Do." might be a ditto for the post title "Sanitary Inspector". The columns: Name, Certificate, Date, Authority, Salary, Allowances, Leave, Remarks.
Given the above grouping, each entry has up to salary. The allowances and leave are not in the entries. They appear later. So maybe the original table had the allowances and leave in columns to the right, and the OCR read them after reading all rows for the left columns. That is common in OCR of tables: it reads column by column.
Thus, the first column (Name, Certificate, Date, Authority, Salary) for all 12 rows are read first (lines 2-75). Then the next column (Allowances) for all 12 rows are read next (lines 76-97). Then the next column (Leave Period) for some rows (lines 87-88, 98-100, 116, 119). Then the next column (Remarks) at lines 122-133. Then "* Uniform." and "281" at end.
If that's the case, then the allowances column has 12 entries (lines 76-97). But we have 11 allowance entries in that range. Let's count the lines from 76 to 97 that are allowances:
76: * (maybe a marker)
77-78: allowance1
79: 310 (salary prefix?)
80: allowance2
81: allowance3
82: allowance4
83: 330
84: allowance5
85: 350
86: allowance6
87: leave1
88: leave2
89: *
90: 330
91: allowance7
92: 350
93: allowance8
94-97: allowance9
That's 9 allowances (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) plus two early allowances (lines50,58) which are before the block. But lines50 and 58 are before line75? Actually line50 is before line51 (Do.. William Fogwill). So line50 is after entry8, before entry9. Line58 is after entry9, before entry10. So those two allowances are interleaved in the first column read. That suggests the OCR didn't read purely column by column; it read row by row for the first few rows, then switched.
Given the complexity, I think the most faithful proofreading is to present the text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR output, with corrected spelling and line breaks, but preserving the structure as a list of entries followed by allowances, leave, remarks. However, the instruction says to use Markdown table syntax for tabular data. Since the data is tabular, I will create a table with the 12 rows and columns: Name, Certificate, Date of Appointment, File Reference, Salary, Allowances, Leave Period, Remarks Code. I will fill the allowances and leave periods from the allowances/leave block in the order they appear, assigning them to rows 1-12 for allowances and rows 1-7 for leave periods (since there are 7 leave periods). For rows without leave, leave blank. For remarks code, use the certificate code(s) from the entry.
This is a reconstruction, but it's the best we can do.
Let's compile the allowances in the order they appear in the OCR from the beginning of the allowances section. Where does the allowances section start? It might start at line50. But line50 is after entry8. Then line58 after entry9. Then line77 after entry12. So the allowances are not in a single contiguous block. However, if we consider the original table had allowances column, the OCR might have read the allowances for each row as it went down the rows, but the allowances column might have been placed to the right and the OCR read it after each row? That would give allowances interleaved. In that case, the allowance for entry1 would be at line50? No, line50 is after entry8. So not.
Given the time, I will assume the allowances for each entry are given in the block after all entries (lines77-97) in order of entries 1-12.
(J 181 )
Do.,
Thomas Heury William King.
(1)
15th Angust, 1927.
C.S.O. 4192 of 1927.
310
Do..
Henry George Stevens.
(1)
1st October,
1927.
C.S.O. 4200 of 1927.
Do..
George Frost.
(1)
24th October,
1927.
C.S.O. 14 in 4020 of 1927.
Do..
Stanley George Poole,
(1)
29th October,
1927.
C 8.0. 4189 of 1927.
Do..
Arthur Williams Thomas White.
(1).
18th February, 1928.
C.N.O. 4705 of 1928.
Do.,
Albert George Martin.
(1)
7th March,
1928.
C.S.O. 2 in 4200 of 1927.
Do,
William Hedley Whittaker.
(1)(4)
15th May, 1928.
C.S.O. 4720 of 1928.
330
Don
Arthur Foster.
(1)
29th May, 1928.
C.S.O. 4724 of 1928
330
Free Quarters. $120 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Langunge Allowance (Cantonese).
Do..
William Fogwill.
(b)
21st June,
1928.
C.F.0 4726 of 1928,
310
Free Quarters, Fuel and Light. $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese).
Do.,
George William Gnun, (1)(4)
29th June, 1928.
C.N.O. 4748 of 1928.
350
Do.,
James Ivor Barnes, M.R.8.1.
Do.,
Thomas Storey Clark.
(1)(4)
(1)
20th July, 1928.
C.8.0. 4751 of 1928,
23rd July, 1928.
C.3.0. 4752 of 1928.
300
*
Free Quarters, Fuel and Light,
$360 Conveyance Allowance and $180 Language Allowance (Can- touese). 310 $600 Rent Allowance, $60 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Lang. Allowance (Cantonese). Free Quarters. $60 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Cantonese).
$600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Langunge Allowance (Can- tonese).
330 $600 Rent Allowance, $300 Con- veysoce Allowance, and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese).
350 $600 Rent Allowance, $120 Con- veyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- lonese).
9 montba and 19 days.
7 months and
24 days.
*
330 $1,200 Rent Allowance, $180 Conveyance Allowance and $120 Language Allowance (Can- tonese).
350 $600 Rent Allowance $120 Con-
veyance Allowance and $120 Lan- guage Allowance (Cantonese), 350 | Free Quarters. $120 Language Allowance(Cantonese), and $240 Conveyance Allowance.
Free Quarters, Fuel and Light.
$120
Allowance Language
(Cantonese.)
8 months and 8 days.
6 months and 28 days.
7 months and 10 days.
15th August,
1927.
1st October, 1927.
24th October,
1927.
29th October,
1927.
18th February, 1928.
7th March,
1928.
15th May, 1928.
29th May, 1928.
21st June, 1928.
29th June,
1928.
6 months audi 27 days.
·
20th July, 1928.
1 month and
26 days.
23rd July,
1928.
REMARKS,
(1) Cervilleste of the Royal Sanitary Institute for Sunitary
Inspectors,
(2) Certificate of the Royal Sanitary Institute for bloat and
Foods.
(3) Certificate of the Liverpool University School of Hygiene
for Meat and Foods,
(4) Certificate in Sanitary Science of the Royal Sanitary
Institute.
(5) Promoted 1st Class Inspector 1st March.
(6) Seconded as Custodian, Government House 20th Novem-
ber to 31st December.
281
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.