The user wants me to proofread OCR output of a historical meteorological record from the Royal Observatory, Hong Kong, for August 1913. The text is a table of daily observations with various columns. The OCR has many errors: misread numbers, garbled text, broken lines, etc. I need to reconstruct the table in Markdown format, preserving the structure and correcting obvious OCR errors.
First, I need to understand the original table structure. The header shows:
Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong, Height above M.S.L. 109 ft. 1913. Month of August.
Columns: Barometer (7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m.), Air Temperature (Max, Min, Daily Means), Tension of Vapour (7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m., Daily Means), Relative Humidity (7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m., Daily Means), Wind Direction and Force (7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m.), Amount of Cloud (0-10), Rainfall, Remarks.
The data rows are for each day of August (1-31). The OCR has many errors: e.g., "ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.." etc. I need to parse each day's data.
Let me go through line by line.
The OCR text starts with "Day. 1913. Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong, Height above M.S.L. 109 ft. 1913. Month of August. Barometer. 7 n. 1 p. 9 p. Long. 7" 36" 41′ 8 E, Lat, 22° 18′ 13-2′′ N. Air Temperature. l'eusion of Vapour. Relative Humidity. Wind. Direction und Force. Amount of Clond. Rainfall. Remarks. 9 P. Max. Min. Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p. I Daily Means, Sums. Aug.! ins 29.405 ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.. 29.460 29.494 80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2 0.890 85 -jog -548 .587 81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936 xxxaxaxat dhe A RE RAKKERKG Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h. 104. 26 15 10 10.0 23 0.990 Thunderstorms. 14 20 12 13 │ X 9.9 0.300 Thunderstorms. 7 19 9.2 0.275 9 9 2 9.1 0.165 6.2 Thunderstorms. Lightning, Thunder, Dew, Slight Rainbow, Dew, Slight fog. [fog. N 6.9 0.230 Dew, Thunder. 3 6.9 0.575 Rainbow. 6 8.1 0.270 1 : 20 9.2 0.845 Dew. 92 20 I 30 9.2 0.535 88 7.9 0.200 Slight fog, Solar halo. 17 8 6.1 0.455 Dew, Thunderstorms. 80 83 77 88 2+ NNNN XON W 9.5 0.965 6 6.6 Dew. 23 9 I z6 2 0.330 Dow. Dew, Solar Corona, Thunder- 9-5 3-975 [storms. 7.1 0.365 Lightning, 82 1.9 Slight fog, Lightning. 83 23 0.8 Slight fog, 8z O 9 2.3 Slight fog. 79 28 2 23 2.0 Slight fog. 16 79 -NOD NO 1 24 6 4.2 Slight fog, Lightning. 2 23 G 15 12 8 17 3.7 24 22 2 1.6 30 6 10 3 1.0 Thunder, Lightning, Lightning 3 + 2.8 76 6 10 19 3.2 6 1 2 23 ++ 9 7.0 Solar halo, Lightning. Lightning, Solar halo, Lightning. Sum, Mean. 29.613 29.611 29.626 79.8 84.5 80.8 86.5 77-7 0.902 84 88 7.2 91 12.6 106|6.7 5.8, 10.565 ( Zb 9 )"
This is messy. I need to reconstruct the table. The table likely has 31 rows (days 1-31). Each row has many columns. The OCR has merged lines. I need to parse each day's data.
Let me identify the columns from the header:
The header lines:
"Barometer. 7 n. 1 p. 9 p." -> Barometer readings at 7am, 1pm, 9pm (inches of mercury?).
"Long. 7" 36" 41′ 8 E, Lat, 22° 18′ 13-2′′ N." -> Longitude and latitude.
"Air Temperature. l'eusion of Vapour. Relative Humidity. Wind. Direction und Force. Amount of Clond. Rainfall. Remarks." -> Actually "Tension of Vapour" (maybe "Tension of Vapour" is the column header). "l'eusion" is likely "Tension". "Clond" is "Cloud".
"9 P. Max. Min. Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p. I Daily Means, Sums." -> This is confusing. Probably the table has columns for Air Temperature: Max, Min, Daily Mean? And Tension of Vapour at 7am, 1pm, 9pm, Daily Mean. Relative Humidity at 7am, 1pm, 9pm, Daily Mean. Wind Direction and Force at 7am, 1pm, 9pm. Amount of Cloud (0-10). Rainfall. Remarks.
The OCR then shows "Aug.! ins 29.405 ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.. 29.460 29.494 80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2 0.890 85 -jog -548 .587 81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 *6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
Then there is a second table for wind: "Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h." and then rows with numbers and remarks.
And finally a summary: "Sum, Mean. 29.613 29.611 29.626 79.8 84.5 80.8 86.5 77-7 0.902 84 88 7.2 91 12.6 106|6.7 5.8, 10.565 ( Zb 9 )"
This is a complex table. I need to produce a Markdown table that represents the data as accurately as possible. Since the OCR is garbled, I must use my best judgment to correct numbers. However, the instruction says: "Preserve original content — do not add or remove substantive words. Do not rephrase, rewrite, or change the author's style, tone, or word choice. Only correct what is clearly wrong." So I should correct obvious OCR errors (like "ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.." which is likely garbage) but not invent data. If data is missing, insert "...".
But the user expects a proofread text in Markdown. The original is a table. I should output a Markdown table with the corrected data.
Given the complexity, I might need to reconstruct the table row by row. Let's attempt to parse each day.
First, note that the Barometer readings are around 29.4 to 29.7 inches. The first line: "Aug.! ins 29.405 ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.. 29.460 29.494" - "Aug.! ins" likely "Aug. 1" (day 1). "29.405" maybe the 7am barometer? Then "29.460" 1pm, "29.494" 9pm? But there are three barometer columns: 7am, 1pm, 9pm. So for day 1: 29.405, 29.460, 29.494.
Then "80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2" - these could be Air Temperature: Max, Min, Daily Mean? Actually there are four numbers: maybe Max, Min, Mean at 7am? Wait, the header: "Air Temperature. l'eusion of Vapour. Relative Humidity." The columns might be: Max, Min, Daily Mean? But then "Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p." suggests there are multiple means.
Let's look at the original format. This is likely a standard meteorological register. Typically, for each day, they record:
The OCR shows many numbers. Let's try to map for day 1.
After barometer: "80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2" - could be Max=82.9, Min=78.2, Mean=80.6? But there are two 80.6. Maybe the first two are 7am and 1pm temperatures? Actually "Air Temperature" might have columns: 7am, 1pm, 9pm, Max, Min, Mean. But the header says "9 P. Max. Min. Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p." This is confusing.
Maybe the table is arranged as:
Day | Barometer (7am, 1pm, 9pm) | Air Temp (7am, 1pm, 9pm, Max, Min, Mean) | Tension of Vapour (7am, 1pm, 9pm, Mean) | Relative Humidity (7am, 1pm, 9pm, Mean) | Wind (7am Dir, 7am Vel, 1pm Dir, 1pm Vel, 9pm Dir, 9pm Vel) | Cloud | Rainfall | Remarks
But the OCR doesn't have clear delimiters.
Given the difficulty, perhaps the best approach is to present the data as a cleaned-up version of the OCR text, preserving the table structure as much as possible, correcting obvious OCR errors, and using Markdown tables. However, the instruction says: "If data is clearly in table format, reconstruct the table using Markdown table syntax." So I must produce a table.
I'll attempt to reconstruct the main table (daily observations) and the wind table separately.
First, let's parse the daily observations. I'll go day by day.
The OCR text after "Aug.! ins 29.405 ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.. 29.460 29.494" seems to be day 1. Then a bunch of numbers. Then "81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 *6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
This appears to be a continuous stream of numbers for 31 days. Each day likely has a fixed number of columns. Let's count columns from the header.
Header columns (from the text):
But the wind data appears later in a separate table. Actually the OCR has a separate wind table after the main table. The main table might have wind direction and force columns, but the OCR shows a separate "Dir. Vel." table. Let's examine the end of the OCR: after the daily numbers, there is "** xxxaxaxat dhe A RE RAKKERKG Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h." Then rows of wind data. So the main table probably does not include wind; wind is in a separate table. The main table includes Barometer, Air Temperature, Tension of Vapour, Relative Humidity, Cloud, Rainfall, Remarks. The wind table includes Direction and Velocity at three times, and maybe cloud amount? Actually the wind table header: "Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h." This suggests three times (7am, 1pm, 9pm) with direction (points) and velocity (mph). Then "(0-10)" might be cloud amount. Then "points.in.p.h." etc. Then the rows have numbers like "104. 26 15 10 10.0 23 0.990 Thunderstorms." This could be day 1: Dir=104? That doesn't make sense. Direction in points (0-32). 104 is too high. Maybe it's a combined code.
Given the complexity and time, perhaps the best is to output the proofread text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the table structure by using Markdown tables for the main data and wind data, but with corrected numbers where obvious. However, the instruction says not to add or remove substantive content. So I should not guess missing numbers. If the OCR is garbled, I should insert "..." for missing/unreadable data.
But the user expects a proofread text. I'll try to produce a Markdown representation that captures the original layout: first the header information, then the main table, then the wind table, then the summary.
I'll clean up the header:
"Day. 1913. Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong, Height above M.S.L. 109 ft. 1913. Month of August. Barometer. 7 a.m. 1 p.m. 9 p.m. Long. 7° 36′ 41″ E, Lat. 22° 18′ 13.2″ N. Air Temperature. Tension of Vapour. Relative Humidity. Wind. Direction and Force. Amount of Cloud. Rainfall. Remarks."
Then the main table. I'll create a Markdown table with columns: Day, Barometer (7am, 1pm, 9pm), Air Temp (Max, Min, Mean), Tension of Vapour (7am, 1pm, 9pm, Mean), Relative Humidity (7am, 1pm, 9pm, Mean), Cloud (0-10), Rainfall (in), Remarks.
But the OCR doesn't clearly separate these. I'll need to parse each day's data from the stream. Let's attempt to parse day by day by looking for day numbers. The OCR has "Aug.! ins 29.405" for day 1. Then later "81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 *6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
I see day numbers embedded: "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21", "22", "14"? Wait "14" appears later. Actually the days might be in order: 1,2,3,... but the OCR doesn't have clear day markers except at the beginning "Aug.! ins" (Aug 1). Then later "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21", "22", "14"? That seems out of order. Maybe "14" is day 24? Let's look: "26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
Here we see "26", "27", "24.", "28", "29", "30", "31". So days 24-31 are at the end. Days 1-23 are earlier but the OCR is garbled.
Given the difficulty, I think the best is to present the data as a cleaned-up text with a table for the summary and wind data, and for the daily data, perhaps a table with days 1-31 but with many cells as "..." due to OCR corruption. However, the instruction says to correct unambiguous OCR errors. I could attempt to correct the numbers that are clearly misread (e.g., "ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.." is garbage, maybe it's "29.405 29.460 29.494" for barometer). But the rest is too messy.
Given the constraints, I'll produce a Markdown document that includes:
But the user might expect the entire table reconstructed. However, the OCR is too corrupted. I'll do my best to extract legible numbers for each day from the stream.
Let's try to parse the stream sequentially, assuming each day has a fixed number of data points. Count the numbers for day 1 from the start: "29.405 29.460 29.494 80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2 0.890 85 -jog -548 .587 81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 *6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
This is a long sequence. Perhaps each day has 27 numbers? Let's count for day 16 onwards where day numbers appear.
At "16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961" - that's a few numbers. Then "17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780" - more numbers. Then "18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889" - etc.
It seems the data for each day is variable. This is not a fixed-width table in the OCR.
Given the time, I'll produce a proofread version that presents the header and then the daily data in a table format with the data as cleaned from the OCR, but I'll note that the OCR is corrupted. However, the instruction says to output only the proofread text in Markdown. I'll do my best to create a plausible table.
I'll structure the output as:
Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong
Height above M.S.L.: 109 ft
Longitude: 7° 36′ 41″ E
Latitude: 22° 18′ 13.2″ N
| Day | Barometer (in) | Air Temperature (°F) | Tension of Vapour (in) | Relative Humidity (%) | Cloud (0-10) | Rainfall (in) | Remarks | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Max | Min | Mean | 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Mean | 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Mean | ||||
| 1 | 29.405 | 29.460 | 29.494 | 82.9 | 78.2 | 80.6 | 0.890 | ... | ... | ... | 85 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 31 | 29.742 | 29.729 | 29.729 | 87.4 | 79.8 | 86.2 | 0.936 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
But I need to fill more. However, I don't have reliable data for all days. The instruction says not to add substantive content. So I should only include what is in the OCR, corrected. But the OCR is a mess. Perhaps the best is to output the text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving line breaks and correcting obvious errors, but not forcing a table if it's not clear. However, the instruction says "If data is clearly in table format, reconstruct the table using Markdown table syntax." The data is clearly a table, but the OCR has lost the structure. I should attempt to reconstruct it.
Given the difficulty, I'll produce a Markdown table for the summary and wind data, and for the daily data, I'll present it as a pre-formatted text block? But the instruction says to use Markdown tables for tabular data.
I'll try to parse the daily data by splitting at day numbers. The OCR has day numbers: "Aug.! ins" (1), then later "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21", "22", "14" (maybe 24?), "26", "27", "24.", "28", "29", "30", "31". Also "13" appears? "13 58." maybe day 13. "10" appears? "10 .566 .48 567" maybe day 10. "11" appears? "1 I +557" maybe day 11. "12"? Not sure.
Let's search for patterns: The OCR has "1 I +557" maybe day 11. "1# 375" maybe day 12? "13 58." day 13. "14 .634" day 14? But then "14" appears again later. Actually "14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77" might be day 14. Then "26" day 26, "27" day 27, "24." day 24, "28" day 28, "29" day 29, "30" day 30, "31" day 31. So days 15, 23, 25 missing? Day 15 might be "15 12 8 17 3.7" in wind table? Not sure.
This is too time-consuming. Given the constraints, I'll output a proofread version that corrects the header and presents the daily data in a table with the numbers as they appear in the OCR, but cleaned of obvious OCR artifacts (like "ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.." removed). I'll keep the numbers in sequence for each day as a single row, but that would be a wide table.
Alternatively, I can output the data as a series of paragraphs for each day, but the instruction says to use tables for tabular data.
I think the best is to produce a Markdown table with the columns as per the header, and fill in the data for each day by manually parsing the OCR stream. I'll do that for days 1-31, using the numbers that appear in order. Since the OCR stream seems to be in day order (1, then 2, 3,... but the day numbers are not all present), I'll assume the stream is sequential. I'll split the stream into 31 chunks of roughly equal number of data points. But that's guesswork.
Given the time, I'll produce a simplified output: the header info, then a table for the summary (means), then a table for wind, and for the daily data, I'll note that the OCR is corrupted and provide the raw cleaned numbers in a code block? But the instruction says not to wrap in code fences. And to use Markdown tables.
I'll compromise: I'll create a table for daily observations with columns Day, Barometer_7am, Barometer_1pm, Barometer_9pm, Max_Temp, Min_Temp, Mean_Temp, Vapour_7am, Vapour_1pm, Vapour_9pm, Vapour_Mean, Humidity_7am, Humidity_1pm, Humidity_9pm, Humidity_Mean, Cloud, Rainfall, Remarks. I'll fill in the values that I can clearly identify from the OCR for each day, and put "..." for others.
Let's attempt to extract for each day by looking at the OCR text and matching patterns.
I'll write a script in my mind? Not possible. I'll do manual extraction for a few days.
From the start: "Aug.! ins 29.405 ไทย. ウ C 11. c/.. 29.460 29.494 80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2 0.890 85 -jog -548 .587 81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661 79. 81.0 78.1 83.4 76.1 .915 89 .630 .639 .633 81-7 77.2 85.1 76.5 A90 90 .610 .604 379 82.0 78.9 83.3 75-4 .863 .561 510 1 +36 .500 82.0 79-9 85.0 76.9 .891 493 -493 83.4 79.0 84.6 76.2 .889 .481 471 -502 78.2 79.9 85.3 76.9 .909 88 .505 -518 -545 78.8 78.7 81.1 R2,0 76.7 .916 91 10 .566 .48 567 78.2 80.5 78.8 82.5 76.9 -923 1 I +557 .561 ·579 78.1 83.1 No.1 86.8 77.0 -917 1# 375 .585 .609 80. 81.1 79.9 84.9 77.8 .909 13 58. 611 6+6 77.9 81.7 78.1 82.8 *6.0 .895 90 .674 .65+ .65% 78.0 $4.6 81.0 85.6 76.1 .906 .655 .618 ,602 $0.2 87.5 81.7 89.4 76.1 .902 16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961 17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780 18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889 19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862 20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994 21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936 22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980 14 .634 .641 .671 82.5 88.0 81.9 90.0 80.4 .899 77 .707 -713 731 80.7 86,1 82.9 87.9 78.9 .895 26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77 27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9 29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871 30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77 31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
I notice that after "Aug.! ins 29.405" there is garbage, then "29.460 29.494". Then "80.6 80.6 82.9 78.2". Then "0.890 85". Then "-jog -548 .587" maybe vapour tensions? Then "81-3 85.2 1 81.2 86.1 78.4 -945- 86 .600 .630 .661" etc.
It seems the data for each day is not separated. This is a continuous printout.
Given the impossibility, I'll output the proofread text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the original line breaks as much as possible, and using a table for the summary and wind data. For the daily data, I'll present it as a pre-formatted text? But the instruction says not to use code fences. I can use a Markdown table with a single column "Raw Data" but that's not ideal.
I think the best is to output the header and then the daily data in a table with the columns as per the original, but only for the days where the OCR is legible (days 16-31). For days 1-15, I'll put "..." in all cells.
Let's try to parse days 16-31 from the OCR.
From "16 -570 486 ! 465 80.5 90.0 $0.5 02.0 78.1 .961" - this seems to be day 16. But what do these numbers correspond to? Possibly: Barometer readings? -570? That can't be barometer. Barometer is around 29.6. So maybe these are vapour tensions? 0.570, 0.486, 0.465? Then "80.5 90.0" maybe temperatures? "$0.5 02.0" maybe rainfall? "78.1 .961" maybe humidity? Not sure.
Look at day 17: "17 1245 .500 .662 79.0 78.5 84.9 74.9 -780" - 1.245? Barometer? 29.245? But barometer is around 29.6. 1.245 is too low. Maybe it's vapour tension? 0.500, 0.662? Then temperatures 79.0, 78.5, 84.9, 74.9? Then -780 maybe humidity?
Day 18: "18 .794 .853 .861 79.3 82.2 79.1 82.4 75-7 .889" - vapour tensions 0.794, 0.853, 0.861? Temperatures 79.3, 82.2, 79.1, 82.4, 75.7? Humidity 0.889?
Day 19: "19 .809 -791 H2 77-4 79.6 86.6 76.1 .862" - vapour 0.809, 0.791? Then temperatures 77.4, 79.6, 86.6, 76.1? Humidity 0.862?
Day 20: "20 -716 .603 .678 77-9 86.2 81.9 87.7 76.1 .994" - vapour 0.716, 0.603, 0.678? Temperatures 77.9, 86.2, 81.9, 87.7, 76.1? Humidity 0.994?
Day 21: "21 685 .684 .678 | 79.9 86.7 82.6 89.6 79.0 -936" - vapour 0.685, 0.684, 0.678? Temperatures 79.9, 86.7, 82.6, 89.6, 79.0? Humidity 0.936?
Day 22: "22 .667 .628 .610 81.3 89.0 83.9 90.9 79-9 -945 .610 +593 .601 82.9 '90.2 83.1 91.1 81.J .980" - vapour 0.667, 0.628, 0.610? Temperatures 81.3, 89.0, 83.9, 90.9, 79.9? Then more numbers.
Day 23? Not clear.
Day 24: "24. 28 ,619 618 .652 81.7 86.2 82.5 88.0 79.8 .878 77 9" - maybe day 24? But "24. 28" could be day 24 and 28? Actually "24. 28" might be day 24 and day 28? Then "29 1704 .714 713 81.6 85-4 $2.4 86.7 79-4 .871" - day 29.
Day 30: "30 -723 743 81.9 86.4 82.4 87.2 80.1 .884 77"
Day 31: "31 .742 729 729 $1.5 86.2 82.2 87.4 79.8 .936"
Also day 26: "26 .725 .668 .640 $1.3 87-4 82.2 89.+ 79.5 .894 77"
Day 27: "27 .617 .60.2 .593 81.2 8.2 83.4 90.2 80.0 .903 77 24."
This is messy.
Given the time, I'll produce a Markdown document that includes the header, a table for the monthly means (summary), a table for wind data, and a note that the daily table is corrupted. But the instruction says to reconstruct the table. I'll do my best to create a daily table with the data I can parse, but I'll keep it simple.
I'll create a table with columns: Day, Barometer_7am, Barometer_1pm, Barometer_9pm, Max_Temp, Min_Temp, Mean_Temp, Vapour_7am, Vapour_1pm, Vapour_9pm, Vapour_Mean, Humidity_7am, Humidity_1pm, Humidity_9pm, Humidity_Mean, Cloud, Rainfall, Remarks.
I'll fill in for days 16-31 using the numbers that seem to correspond. For days 1-15, I'll leave as "..." or omit.
But the user might want the entire text proofread. I'll output the entire OCR text cleaned up, with corrected words, and use a table for the summary and wind. For the daily data, I'll present it as a list of days with the numbers in a code block? But no code fences allowed. I can use a Markdown table with a single column "Data" but that's not good.
Given the constraints, I'll output the proofread text as follows:
I'll attempt to map the first few days from the OCR by assuming the data starts at "Aug.! ins 29.405" and then each day has a fixed number of entries. Let's count the number of data entries per day from the summary: The summary shows "Sum, Mean. 29.613 29.611 29.626 79.8 84.5 80.8 86.5 77-7 0.902 84 88 7.2 91 12.6 106|6.7 5.8, 10.565". This suggests the monthly means for: Barometer 7am, 1pm, 9pm; Air Temp Max? 79.8? Actually 79.8 might be mean temperature at 7am? 84.5 at 1pm? 80.8 at 9pm? 86.5 max? 77.7 min? 0.902 mean vapour tension? 84 mean humidity 7am? 88 at 1pm? 7.2 at 9pm? 91 mean humidity? 12.6 cloud? 106|6.7 wind? 5.8 rainfall? 10.565 something.
This is not enough.
I think I have to accept that I cannot perfectly reconstruct the table. I'll output a cleaned-up version of the OCR text as a single Markdown document, with the header, then the daily data presented as a table with the raw numbers in a single column? No.
Given the instruction "Output only in Markdown. Do not wrap your response in code fences or HTML tags." I'll produce a Markdown document with:
Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong
Height above M.S.L.: 109 ft
Longitude: 7° 36′ 41″ E
Latitude: 22° 18′ 13.2″ N
| Day | Barometer (in) | Air Temperature (°F) | Tension of Vapour (in) | Relative Humidity (%) | Cloud (0-10) | Rainfall (in) | Remarks | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Max | Min | Mean | 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Mean | 7am | 1pm | 9pm | Mean | ||||
| 1 | 29.405 | 29.460 | 29.494 | 82.9 | 78.2 | 80.6 | 0.890 | ... | ... | ... | 85 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 16 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.570 | 0.486 | 0.465 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 17 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.500 | 0.662 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 18 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.794 | 0.853 | 0.861 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.889 | ... | ... | ... |
| 19 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.809 | 0.791 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.862 | ... | ... | ... |
| 20 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.716 | 0.603 | 0.678 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.994 | ... | ... | ... |
| 21 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.685 | 0.684 | 0.678 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.936 | ... | ... | ... |
| 22 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.667 | 0.628 | 0.610 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.980 | ... | ... | ... |
| 23 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 24 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.619 | 0.618 | 0.652 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.878 | ... | ... | ... |
| 25 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 26 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.725 | 0.668 | 0.640 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.894 | ... | ... | ... |
| 27 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.617 | 0.602 | 0.593 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.903 | ... | ... | ... |
| 28 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 29 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.714 | 0.713 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.871 | ... | ... | ... |
| 30 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.723 | 0.743 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.884 | ... | ... | ... |
| 31 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.742 | 0.729 | 0.729 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 0.936 | ... | ... | ... |
But this is largely invented. The instruction says not to add substantive content. So I should not invent the column mapping. I should only correct the OCR text.
Maybe the best is to output the OCR text with corrections: fix "7 n." to "7 a.m.", "1 p." to "1 p.m.", "9 p." to "9 p.m.", "l'eusion" to "Tension", "Clond" to "Cloud", "und" to "and", "Dir. Vel." etc. And then present the daily data as a table with the numbers as they appear in the OCR, but in a structured way. However, the OCR doesn't have clear row delimiters.
Given the difficulty, I'll output the proofread text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, preserving the original line breaks and correcting obvious errors, and for the tabular data, I'll use a Markdown table for the summary and wind data, and for the daily data, I'll present it as a pre-formatted text using a Markdown table with a single column "Raw Data" but that's not allowed? I can use a table with multiple columns but with the data as it appears.
I'll do this: I'll create a table for the daily observations with columns: Day, Data. But that's not good.
I think I'll output the entire text as a series of paragraphs and tables where identifiable. The user can see the corrected text.
Let's start writing the Markdown.
First, the header:
Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong
Height above M.S.L.: 109 ft
Longitude: 7° 36′ 41″ E
Latitude: 22° 18′ 13.2″ N
Month: August 1913
Barometer readings at: 7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m.
Air Temperature: Max, Min, Daily Mean
Tension of Vapour: 7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m., Daily Mean
Relative Humidity: 7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m., Daily Mean
Wind: Direction and Force at 7 a.m., 1 p.m., 9 p.m.
Amount of Cloud: 0-10
Rainfall: inches
Remarks:
Then the daily observations. Since the OCR is garbled, I'll present the data as a table with the numbers extracted sequentially, but I'll note that the OCR is corrupted.
But the instruction says to reconstruct the table. I'll attempt to reconstruct the table by assuming each day has 27 data points (based on typical format). I'll split the number stream into 31 groups. Let's count the numbers in the stream. I'll do a rough count.
The stream from "29.405" to "0.936" contains many numbers. I'll copy the stream and count numbers separated by spaces. But there are also non-numeric tokens.
Given the time, I'll output a simplified version: I'll present the summary table and wind table, and for the daily data, I'll say "Daily data corrupted in OCR; see original scan." But that might not be acceptable.
The user asked to proofread the OCR output. They provided the OCR text. They want the proofread text in Markdown. I'll provide the proofread text with corrections, keeping the original structure as much as possible. I'll use a Markdown table for the summary and wind data, and for the daily data, I'll present it as a table with the columns as per the header, but only fill in the values that are clearly readable from the OCR for each day, leaving others blank.
I'll write a script in my mind to parse the OCR? Not possible.
I'll manually create a table for days 1-31 with the data I can glean from the OCR by looking at the patterns near day numbers.
From the OCR, I see explicit day numbers: "Aug.! ins" (1), "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21", "22", "14" (maybe 24?), "26", "27", "24.", "28", "29", "30", "31". Also "13" appears. "10" appears. "11" appears. "12" appears? "1#" maybe 12. "15" appears? "15 12 8 17 3.7" in wind section.
Let's extract the wind section separately. The wind section starts with "Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h." Then rows:
"104. 26 15 10 10.0 23 0.990 Thunderstorms."
"14 20 12 13 │ X 9.9 0.300 Thunderstorms."
"7 19 9.2 0.275"
"9 9 2 9.1 0.165 6.2 Thunderstorms."
"Lightning, Thunder, Dew, Slight Rainbow, Dew, Slight fog. [fog."
"N 6.9 0.230 Dew, Thunder."
"3 6.9 0.575 Rainbow."
"6 8.1 0.270"
"1 : 20 9.2 0.845 Dew."
"92 20 I 30 9.2 0.535"
"88 7.9 0.200 Slight fog, Solar halo."
"17 8 6.1 0.455 Dew, Thunderstorms."
"80 83 77 88 2+ NNNN XON W 9.5 0.965"
"6 6.6 Dew."
"23 9 I z6 2 0.330 Dow."
"Dew, Solar Corona, Thunder- 9-5 3-975 [storms."
"7.1 0.365 Lightning,"
"82 1.9 Slight fog, Lightning."
"83 23 0.8 Slight fog,"
"8z O 9 2.3 Slight fog."
"79 28 2 23 * 2.0 Slight fog."
"16 79 -NOD NO 1 24 6 4.2 Slight fog, Lightning."
"2 23 G 15 12 8 17 3.7"
"24 22 2 1.6"
"30 6 10 3 1.0 Thunder, Lightning, Lightning"
"3 + 2.8"
"76 6 10 19 3.2"
"6 1 2 23 ++ 9 7.0 Solar halo, Lightning. Lightning,"
"Solar halo, Lightning."
This is also garbled.
Given the extreme corruption, I think the best is to output the proofread text as a cleaned-up version of the OCR, with corrected words, and indicate the table structure with Markdown tables for the parts that are clear (header, summary). For the daily data, I'll present it as a code block? But no code fences. I'll use a Markdown table with a single column "OCR Text" but that's not good.
I'll compromise: I'll output the entire text as a Markdown document with the header, then a table for the monthly means, then a table for the wind data (as best as I can), and then the daily data as a table with the raw numbers in a single column? No.
Given the instruction "If data is clearly in table format, reconstruct the table using Markdown table syntax." The daily data is clearly a table, but the OCR has lost the format. I should still attempt to reconstruct it. I'll do a simple reconstruction: create a table with the column headers as per the original, and then for each day, put the numbers that appear in the OCR in order, but I'll need to decide how many columns.
Let's count the columns from the header line: "Barometer. 7 n. 1 p. 9 p. Long. 7" 36" 41′ 8 E, Lat, 22° 18′ 13-2′′ N. Air Temperature. l'eusion of Vapour. Relative Humidity. Wind. Direction und Force. Amount of Clond. Rainfall. Remarks. 9 P. Max. Min. Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p. I Daily Means, Sums."
This suggests the table has columns for Barometer (3), Air Temperature (maybe 3: 9 P., Max, Min? Actually "9 P. Max. Min. Daily Daily Means. Means. 7 A. 1 p. 9 p." This is confusing. It might be that the Air Temperature column has sub-columns: 9 a.m.? Max, Min, Daily Mean, and then Means at 7am, 1pm,
Day.
1913.
Station: Royal Observatory, Hongkong,
Height above M.S.L. 109 ft.
1913.
Month of August.
Barometer.
7 n.
1 p.
9 p.
Long. 7" 36" 41′ 8 E,
Lat, 22° 18′ 13-2′′ N.
Air Temperature.
l'eusion
of
Vapour.
Relative
Humidity.
Wind.
Direction und Force.
Amount of
Clond.
Rainfall.
Remarks.
9 P.
Max.
Min.
Daily Daily Means. Means.
7 A.
1 p.
9 p.
I
Daily Means,
Sums.
Aug.!
ins 29.405
ไทย.
ウ
C
11.
c/..
29.460
29.494
80.6
80.6
82.9
78.2
0.890
85
-jog
-548
.587
81-3
85.2 1
81.2
86.1
78.4
-945-
86
.600
.630
.661
79.
81.0
78.1
83.4
76.1
.915
89
.630
.639 .633
81-7
77.2
85.1
76.5
A90
90
.610
.604
379
82.0
78.9
83.3
75-4
.863
.561 510
1
+36
.500
82.0
79-9
85.0
76.9
.891
493
-493
83.4
79.0
84.6
76.2
.889
.481
471
-502
78.2
79.9
85.3
76.9
.909
88
.505
-518
-545
78.8
78.7
81.1
R2,0
76.7
.916
91
10
.566
.48
567
78.2
80.5
78.8
82.5
76.9
-923
1 I
+557
.561
·579
78.1
83.1
No.1
86.8
77.0
-917
1#
375
.585
.609
80.
81.1
79.9
84.9
77.8
.909
13
58.
611
6+6
77.9
81.7
78.1
82.8
*6.0
.895 90
.674
.65+
.65%
78.0
$4.6
81.0
85.6
76.1
.906
.655
.618
,602
$0.2
87.5
81.7
89.4
76.1
.902
16
-570
486
!
465
80.5
90.0
$0.5
02.0
78.1
.961
17
1245
.500
.662
79.0
78.5
84.9
74.9
-780
18
.794
.853
.861
79.3
82.2
79.1
82.4
75-7
.889
19
.809
-791
H2
77-4
79.6
86.6
76.1
.862
20 -716
.603
.678
77-9
86.2
81.9
87.7
76.1
.994
21
685
.684
.678 |
79.9
86.7
82.6 89.6
79.0
-936
22
.667 .628
.610
81.3 89.0
83.9 90.9
79-9
-945
.610
+593
.601
82.9
'90.2
83.1
91.1
81.J
.980
14
.634 .641
.671
82.5
88.0
81.9
90.0
80.4
.899 77
.707
-713
731
80.7
86,1
82.9
87.9
78.9
.895
26
.725
.668
.640
$1.3
87-4
82.2
89.+ 79.5
.894 77
27 .617
.60.2
.593
81.2
8.2
83.4
90.2
80.0
.903 77 24.
28
,619
618
.652
81.7
86.2
82.5
88.0
79.8
.878 77 9
29
1704
.714
713
81.6
85-4
$2.4
86.7
79-4
.871
30
-723
743 81.9
86.4
82.4
87.2
80.1
.884 77
31
.742
729
729
$1.5
86.2
82.2
87.4
79.8
.936
** xxxaxaxat dhe A RE RAKKERKG
Dir. Vel. Dir. Vel.¡ Dir. |Vel. (0-10). points.in.p.h. polits Im.ph. ¡points.jm.p.h.
104.
26
15
10
10.0 23
0.990
Thunderstorms.
14
20 12
13 │
X
9.9
0.300
Thunderstorms.
7
19
9.2
0.275
9
9
2
9.1
0.165
6.2
Thunderstorms.
Lightning, Thunder, Dew, Slight Rainbow, Dew, Slight fog. [fog.
N
6.9
0.230
Dew, Thunder.
3
6.9
0.575
Rainbow.
6
8.1
0.270
1
:
20
9.2
0.845
Dew.
92 20
I
30
9.2 0.535
88
7.9
0.200
Slight fog, Solar halo.
17
8
6.1
0.455
Dew, Thunderstorms.
80
83
77
88
2+
NNNN
XON W
9.5
0.965
6
6.6
Dew.
23 9
I
z6
2
0.330
Dow.
Dew, Solar Corona, Thunder-
9-5
3-975
[storms.
7.1
0.365
Lightning,
82
1.9
Slight fog, Lightning.
83
23
0.8
Slight fog,
8z
O
9
2.3
Slight fog.
79
28
2 23
*
2.0
Slight fog.
16
79
-NOD NO
1 24
6
4.2
Slight fog, Lightning.
2
23
G
15
12 8
17
3.7
24
22
2
1.6
30 6 10
3
1.0
Thunder, Lightning, Lightning
3
+
2.8
76
6
10
19
3.2
6
1 2
23
++
9
7.0
Solar halo, Lightning. Lightning,
Solar halo, Lightning.
Sum,
Mean. 29.613
29.611 29.626
79.8
84.5
80.8
86.5
77-7
0.902
84 88 7.2
91 12.6 106|6.7
5.8, 10.565
( Zb 9 )
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.