1860 — Page 145

Blue Books 香港計冊 All AI Reviewed

Return of the number of cases tried before the Honorable The Chief Justice, and actions Commenced in the Supreme Court and Vice Admiralty Court of Hong Kong during the year ending 31st December, 1860.

Supreme Court.

Common Law.

Chancery.

Summary.

Insolvency.

Appeals.

Vice Admiralty Court.

Cases tried before The Honorable the Chief Justice in 1860.

Court Number of Cases Debt and Damages claimed Judgment for Plaintiff Judgment for Defendant Nonsuit Total
Supreme Court - Common Law 149 $261,970.23 54 15 60
$488.67
Chancery 8 $171,469.85
Summary A
Insolvency 157 $472,914.52 106 13
Appeals for appellant

Actions Commenced in 1860.

Court Number of Cases Amount of debt and damages claimed Settled without Trial Judgment for Plaintiff Judgment for Defendant Nonsuit Remaining in Dependence
Supreme Court - Common Law 261 $202,708.00 72 52
Chancery 54 $346,941.53 32 2 20
Summary 4 $29,496.57 4
Insolvency H $30,677.67
Probate 25 $35,059.72
Appeal 1 1
Vice Admiralty Court C

A. Five of these cases were in dependence on 31st December 1859.

H. In eight of these cases the amount could not be entered, one was for appellant.

C. In one of these cases the Petition was withdrawn - for the other 6, see note I.

I. In ten of these cases Probate was granted, and the estate was not appraised - the amount given above is from the returns given by the Court appraisers in Intestate estates. Four of these cases were Petitions for Bounty.

(Signed) W. H. Alexander,

Registrar.

Colonial Secretary's Office, Hong Kong.

Page 145

Page 146

Edit History

2026-07-03 14:21:21 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Return of the number of cases tried before the Honorable The Chief Justice, and actions Commenced in the Supreme Court and Vice Admiralty Court of Hong Kong during the year ending 31st December, 1860. Supreme Court. Common Law. Chancery. Summary. Insolvency. Appeals. Vice Admiralty Court. Cases tried before The Honorable the Chief Justice in 1860. Court Number of Cases Debt and Damages claimed Judgment for Plaintiff Judgment for Defendant Nonsuit Total Supreme Court - Common Law 149 $261,970.23 54 15 60 $488.67 Chancery 8 $171,469.85 Summary A Insolvency 157 $472,914.52 106 13 Appeals for appellant Actions Commenced in 1860. Court Number of Cases Amount of debt and damages claimed Settled without Trial Judgment for Plaintiff Judgment for Defendant Nonsuit Remaining in Dependence Supreme Court - Common Law 261 $202,708.00 72 52 Chancery 54 $346,941.53 32 2 20 Summary 4 $29,496.57 4 Insolvency H $30,677.67 Probate 25 $35,059.72 Appeal 1 1 Vice Admiralty Court C A. Five of these cases were in dependence on 31st December 1859. H. In eight of these cases the amount could not be entered, one was for appellant. C. In one of these cases the Petition was withdrawn - for the other 6, see note I. I. In ten of these cases Probate was granted, and the estate was not appraised - the amount given above is from the returns given by the Court appraisers in Intestate estates. Four of these cases were Petitions for Bounty. (Signed) W. H. Alexander, Registrar. Colonial Secretary's Office, Hong Kong. Page 145 Page 146
Baseline (Original)
Return of the number of cases tried before the Honorable The Chief Justice, and actims Commenced in the Supreme bourt Supreme Court. Common Law. Chancery- Summary. Insolvency Appeals Vice Admiralty Courti~___ and Nice Admiralty Court's of Hongtong during the year ending 31%! (December, 1860. bases tried before The Honorable the Chief Justice in 1860. Number Amount of Debt and Total 149 Judgment Plaintiff Defendant Nonsuit Casco Debt and Damages. of Cases damages claimed 8 A 261.970 5 για 60 | * 15.986 23,488.67. 54 • 157 for appellant 171.469.85 13. 106. $472.914.52 Actions Commenced in 1860.. bourt Numbe of Cares Amount of debt and damages claimed Settled without Trial Judgment Plaintiff Defendant nonsuit Remaining in Dependence Cases Total Debt and Damages Impresne Court- Common Law. Chancery= Summary Insolvency Probati. Appeal Nice Admiralty Court_ C 54 4 H $346,941.53 32 2 • P 1611 " ๆๆ 25 1 29.496.57 30.677.67 35,059.72 • 4 72 52 261 202.708.00 A. Five of these cases were in dependence be entered. H. In Mone amount be entired, one for appellant 12 1 19 20 278. #виц, 883. .५१.- on 310! December 1859.. of the other cases thewin dependence Eight are still pending, and the remainder were settled - without trial. A Rule for a new trial was granted in one case, and it will be tried in the Cource of 1861. B one case was in dependence on 31a! December 1859. & Tire of these cases were in dependence on 314 December 1859. the remainder in dependence settled without trial, D. In tis of these cases the Petitions were dismissed, and the Betitioners returned to Gaol for stated periods, in the other four cases the Petitioners were discharged, B. This was an appeal from the Police Court, no amount coned be entered. F. One of these cases was in dependence on 31 December 1859. &. One of these cases was for Ejcctment, and one for unliquidated Damages no amount cones) of these could any being a Bill to purpelivate testimony, one to recover a certain balance, and two Injunctions to restrain to 1. One of these cases was to recover possession of certain premises. No amount entered. I In one of these cases the Petition was withdrawn - for the other 6. see note 1. I. h ten of these cases Probate was granted, and the estateo not appraised - the amount given above is from the returns given by the bourt appraisers in Intestali batalio, to- Four of these cases were Batitions for Bounty. (Signes) W. H. Alexander, Registrar. (блефн Colonial decretly Page 145Page 146
2026-07-03 14:21:21 · Baseline
View content

Return of the number of cases tried before the Honorable The Chief Justice, and actims Commenced in the Supreme

bourt

Supreme Court.

Common Law.

Chancery-

Summary.

Insolvency

Appeals

Vice Admiralty Courti~___

and Nice Admiralty Court's of Hongtong during the year ending 31%! (December, 1860.

bases tried before The Honorable the Chief Justice in 1860.

Number Amount of Debt and

Total

149

Judgment

Plaintiff Defendant

Nonsuit

Casco

Debt and Damages.

of

Cases

damages claimed

8 A

261.970

5

για

60

| *

15.986 23,488.67.

54

157

for appellant

171.469.85

13.

106.

$472.914.52

Actions Commenced in 1860..

bourt

Numbe of

Cares

Amount of debt and damages claimed

Settled without Trial

Judgment

Plaintiff Defendant

nonsuit

Remaining

in Dependence Cases

Total

Debt and Damages

Impresne Court-

Common Law.

Chancery= Summary

Insolvency

Probati. Appeal

Nice Admiralty Court_

C

54

4

H

$346,941.53

32

2

P

1611

"

ๆๆ

25

1

29.496.57 30.677.67 35,059.72

4

72

52

261

202.708.00

A. Five of these cases were in dependence

be entered.

H. In

Mone

amount be entired, one

for appellant

12

1

19

20

278.

#виц, 883.

.५१.-

on 310! December 1859.. of the other cases thewin dependence Eight are still pending, and the remainder were settled - without trial. A Rule for a new trial was granted in one case, and it will be tried in the Cource of 1861. B one case was in dependence on 31a! December 1859. & Tire of these cases were in dependence on 314 December 1859. the remainder in dependence settled without trial, D. In tis of these cases the Petitions were dismissed, and the Betitioners returned to Gaol for stated periods, in the other four cases the Petitioners were discharged, B. This was an appeal from the Police Court, no amount coned be entered. F. One of these cases was in dependence on 31 December 1859. &. One of these cases was for Ejcctment, and one for unliquidated Damages no amount cones)

of these could

any

being a Bill to purpelivate testimony, one to recover a certain balance, and two Injunctions to restrain to 1. One of these cases was to recover possession of certain premises. No amount entered. I In one of these cases the Petition was withdrawn - for the other 6. see note 1. I. h ten of these cases Probate was granted, and the estateo not appraised - the amount given above is from the returns given by the bourt appraisers in Intestali batalio, to- Four of these cases were Batitions for Bounty.

(Signes) W. H. Alexander,

Registrar.

(блефн

Colonial decretly

Page 145Page 146

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.