AnnualReport-1932 — Page 239

Administrative Reports 行政報告書 All AI Reviewed

G (1) 2

J

7. Comparative figures for the years 1931 and 1932 are given below:-

COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.

BANKRUPTCY.

Year Data 1932 2 1 42 15 27 1931 3 2 22 14 8 16 12 2 2 ... Year Discharges granted Receiving Orders rescinded Adjudications annulled Assets for distribution Estimated Liabilities Fees in Stamps Official Receiver's Commission Possession Fees Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue 1932 4 $397,638.09 $991,452.64 $5,550.20 $12,805.17 $1,216 1931 7 $877,619.72 $2,170,526.88 $2,995.50 $24,106.34 $574.26 $1,096.28

REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS.

Revenue.

8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year. This is accounted for by the fact that the increased scale of fees introduced on the 1st September, 1931 was in force throughout the whole period under review, as the number of applications for registration decreased by about twelve per cent.

Opposed Registrations.

9. Nine applications for registration were opposed during the year and, in every case, the applications for registration were

Edit History

2026-05-09 09:30:21 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
G (1) 2 J 7. Comparative figures for the years 1931 and 1932 are given below:- COMPANIES LIQUIDATION. BANKRUPTCY. Year Data 1932 2 1 42 15 27 1931 3 2 22 14 8 16 12 2 2 ... Year Discharges granted Receiving Orders rescinded Adjudications annulled Assets for distribution Estimated Liabilities Fees in Stamps Official Receiver's Commission Possession Fees Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue 1932 4 $397,638.09 $991,452.64 $5,550.20 $12,805.17 $1,216 1931 7 $877,619.72 $2,170,526.88 $2,995.50 $24,106.34 $574.26 $1,096.28 REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS. Revenue. 8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year. This is accounted for by the fact that the increased scale of fees introduced on the 1st September, 1931 was in force throughout the whole period under review, as the number of applications for registration decreased by about twelve per cent. Opposed Registrations. 9. Nine applications for registration were opposed during the year and, in every case, the applications for registration were
Baseline (Original)
G (1) 2 J 7. Comparative figures for the years 1931 and 1932 are given below:- COMPANIES LIQUIDATION. BANKRUPTCY. 1932 2 1 42 15 | 27 31 26 28 4 CO 6 1 1931 GO 3 2 22 14 8 16 12 2 2 ... Year. Discharges granted. Receiving Orders rescinded. Adjudications annulled. 1982 4 1931 7 : Assets for dis- tribution. Estimated Liabilities. Fees in Stamps. Official Receiver's Com- mission. Possession Fees. Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue. $ C. $ C. 0. 397,638.09 991,452.64 5,550.20 12,805.17 | 1,216 877,619.72 2,170,526.88 2,995.50 24,106.34 C. $ $ 574.26 1,096.28 REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS. Revenue. 8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year. This is accounted for by the fact that the increased scale of fees in- troduced on the 1st September, 1931 was in force throughout the whole period under review, as the number of applications for registration decreased by about twelve per cent. Opposed Registrations. 9. Nine applications for registration were opposed during the year and, in every case, the applications for registration were
2026-05-09 09:30:21 · Baseline
View content

G (1) 2

J

7. Comparative figures for the years 1931 and 1932 are given below:-

COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.

BANKRUPTCY.

1932 2 1 42 15 | 27

31

26

28

4

CO

6

1

1931

GO

3

2 22 14 8

16

୫ 12

2 2

...

Year.

Discharges

granted.

Receiving Orders rescinded.

Adjudications annulled.

1982

4

1931

7

:

Assets

for dis- tribution.

Estimated Liabilities.

Fees in Stamps.

Official Receiver's Com- mission.

Possession Fees.

Unclaimed Balances transferred

to

General Revenue.

$ C. $

C.

0.

397,638.09

991,452.64

5,550.20 12,805.17 | 1,216

877,619.72 2,170,526.88

2,995.50 24,106.34

C.

$

$

574.26

1,096.28

REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS.

Revenue.

8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year. This is accounted for by the fact that the increased scale of fees in- troduced on the 1st September, 1931 was in force throughout the whole period under review, as the number of applications for registration decreased by about twelve per cent.

Opposed Registrations.

9. Nine applications for registration were opposed during the year and, in every case, the applications for registration were

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.