G (1) 2
5. Comparative figures for the years 1929 and 1930 are given below:-
COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.
1930 1929 1 1 | 20 1 | 15 14 6 12 6 12 CO GO 3 3 3 11 9 14 Ι 7 7!BANKRUPTCY.
Year. Granted. Discharges Receiving Orders rescinded. Adjudications annulled. Assets for distribution. Estimated liabilities. Fees in Stamps. Official Receiver's Commission. Unclaimed balances transferred to General Revenue. 1930 6 $ 830,536.39 3,796,001.67 5,225.25 11,651.13 $ 793.92 1929 2 71,067.15 254,725.41 4,073.25 9,498.27 65,968.39TRADE MARKS.
6. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks again showed a slight increase over the preceding year.
Opposed Registrations and Appeals.
7. Four applications for registration of trade marks were opposed during the year. In two cases the applications to register were withdrawn, in another the opposition succeeded, and were consolidated.
G (1) 2
5. Comparative figures for the years 1929 and 1930 arc given below:-
COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.
BANKRUPTCY.
1930
1
1 | 20
14 6 12
αι
12
CO
3
1929
1
1 15
12
GO
3
11
9
14
Ι
7 7!
Year.
Granted.
Discharges
Receiving Orders rescinded.
Adjudications annulled.
Assets
for dis- tribution.
Estimated liabilities.
Fees in Stamps.
Official Receiver's
Com- mission.
Unclaimed balances transferred
to General Revenue.
$
CA
$ C.
C.
1930
6
830,536,39 3,796,001.67
5,225,25
ૐ C.
11,651.13
$
C.
793.92
1929
2
71,067.15 254,725.41 4,073.25 9.498.27
65,968.39
TRADE MARKS.
Revenue.
6. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks again showed a slight increase over the preceding year.
Opposed Registrations and Appeals.
7. Four applications for registration of trade marks were opposed during the year. In two cases the applications to register were withdrawn, in another the opposition succeeded,
consolidated.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.