AnnualReport-1928 — Page 258

Administrative Reports 行政報告書 All AI Reviewed

K 12-

# CONDUCT.

Owing to the re-classification of Offences in the Regulation published in August, 1927, it is not possible to make a complete comparison of the figures for 1928 with those of previous years.

## "A" Contingent.

The conduct of the European Contingent was good. The total number of reports against them was 121 as against 119 in 1927. There were 5 reports for being drunk or under the influence of drink, as against 14 in 1927. There were 25 reports for neglect of duty as against 24 in 1927; for misconduct there were 11 reports.

## "B" Contingent.

The conduct of the Indian Contingent was fair. There were 1,189 reports as against 779 for the preceding year.

For drunkenness there were 12 as against 21 in 1927. For neglect of duty 217 as against 42, for misconduct there were 341. Minor Offences 619. 2 men were convicted by the Police Magistrate (Dismissed from the Force) 1 for receiving a bribe, and 1 for larceny of fruits. 240 men had no report as against 345 in 1927.

## "C" Contingent.

The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Cantonese) was fair. There were 1,347 reports as against 1,343 in 1927. For drunkenness there were none as against 5 in 1927. For neglect of duty there were 219 and for misconduct there were 297. There were 858 minor offences. 226 men had no reports as against 258 in 1927.

## "D" Contingent.

The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Wei-hai-wei) was fair. There were 339 reports as against 498 in 1927. For drunkenness there was 1 as against 2 in 1927. There were 84 for misconduct and 59 for neglect of duty. For minor offences there were 196 as against 387 in 1927. 44 men had no report as against 76 in 1927.

## "T"-Water Police.

The conduct of the Chinese Staff of the Water Police (average strength 230) was fair. There were 323 reports as compared with 322 for the previous year. For disorderly conduct there were 3 as against 14 in 1927, 7 for neglect of duty as against 21 in 1927, 116 for absence from Station or launch as against 226 in 1927, 15 for sleeping on duty as against 9 in 1927, 119 were reported for minor offences during 1927.

Edit History

2026-05-08 22:24:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

K 12- # CONDUCT. Owing to the re-classification of Offences in the Regulation published in August, 1927, it is not possible to make a complete comparison of the figures for 1928 with those of previous years. ## "A" Contingent. The conduct of the European Contingent was good. The total number of reports against them was 121 as against 119 in 1927. There were 5 reports for being drunk or under the influence of drink, as against 14 in 1927. There were 25 reports for neglect of duty as against 24 in 1927; for misconduct there were 11 reports. ## "B" Contingent. The conduct of the Indian Contingent was fair. There were 1,189 reports as against 779 for the preceding year. For drunkenness there were 12 as against 21 in 1927. For neglect of duty 217 as against 42, for misconduct there were 341. Minor Offences 619. 2 men were convicted by the Police Magistrate (Dismissed from the Force) 1 for receiving a bribe, and 1 for larceny of fruits. 240 men had no report as against 345 in 1927. ## "C" Contingent. The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Cantonese) was fair. There were 1,347 reports as against 1,343 in 1927. For drunkenness there were none as against 5 in 1927. For neglect of duty there were 219 and for misconduct there were 297. There were 858 minor offences. 226 men had no reports as against 258 in 1927. ## "D" Contingent. The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Wei-hai-wei) was fair. There were 339 reports as against 498 in 1927. For drunkenness there was 1 as against 2 in 1927. There were 84 for misconduct and 59 for neglect of duty. For minor offences there were 196 as against 387 in 1927. 44 men had no report as against 76 in 1927. ## "T"-Water Police. The conduct of the Chinese Staff of the Water Police (average strength 230) was fair. There were 323 reports as compared with 322 for the previous year. For disorderly conduct there were 3 as against 14 in 1927, 7 for neglect of duty as against 21 in 1927, 116 for absence from Station or launch as against 226 in 1927, 15 for sleeping on duty as against 9 in 1927, 119 were reported for minor offences during 1927.

Baseline (Original)

K 12- CONDUCT. Owing to the re-classification of Offences in the Regulation published in August, 1927, it is not possible to make a complete comparison of the figures for 1928 with those of previous years. "A" Contingent. The conduct of the European Contingent was good. The total number of reports against them was 121 as against 119 in 1927. There were 5 reports for being drunk or under the influence of drink, as against 14 in 1927. There were 25 reports for neglect of duty as against 24 in 1927; for misconduct there were 11 reports. "B" Contingent. The conduct of the Indian Contingent was fair. There were 1,189 reports as against 779 for the preceding year. For drunkenness there were 12 as against 21 in 1927. For neglert of duty 217 as against 42, for misconduct there were 341. Minor Offences 619. 2 men were convicted by the Police Magistrate (Dismissed from the Force) 1 for receiving a bribe, and 1 for larceny of fruits. 240 men had no report as against 345 in 1927. "C" Contingent. The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Cantonese) was fair. There were 1,347 reports as against 1,343 in 1927. For drunkenness there were none as against 5 in 1927. For neglect of duty there were 219 and for misconduct there were 297. There were 858 minor offences. 226 men had no reports as against 258 in 1927. “D” Contingent. For The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Wei-hai-wei) was fair. There were 339 reports as against 498 in 1927. drunkenness there was 1 as against 2 in 1927. There were 84 for misconduct and 59 for neglect of duty. For minor offences there were 196 as against 387 in 1927. 44 men had no report as against 76 in 1927. "T"-Water Police. The conduct of the Chinese Staff of the Water Police (average strength 230) was fair. There were 323 reports as com- pared with 322 for the previous year. For disorderly conduct there were 3 as against 14 in 1927, 7 for neglect of duty us against 21 in 1927, 116 for absence from Station or launch as against 226 in 1927, 15 for sleeping on duty as against 9 in 1927, 119 were reported for minor offences during 1927.

2026-05-08 22:24:33 · Baseline

View content

K 12-

CONDUCT.

Owing to the re-classification of Offences in the Regulation published in August, 1927, it is not possible to make a complete comparison of the figures for 1928 with those of previous years.

"A" Contingent.

"B" Contingent.

The conduct of the Indian Contingent was fair. There were 1,189 reports as against 779 for the preceding year.

For drunkenness there were 12 as against 21 in 1927. For neglert of duty 217 as against 42, for misconduct there were 341. Minor Offences 619. 2 men were convicted by the Police Magistrate (Dismissed from the Force) 1 for receiving a bribe, and 1 for larceny of fruits. 240 men had no report as against 345 in 1927.

"C" Contingent.

“D” Contingent.

For

The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (Wei-hai-wei) was fair. There were 339 reports as against 498 in 1927. drunkenness there was 1 as against 2 in 1927. There were 84 for misconduct and 59 for neglect of duty. For minor offences there were 196 as against 387 in 1927. 44 men had no report as against 76 in 1927.

"T"-Water Police.

The conduct of the Chinese Staff of the Water Police (average strength 230) was fair. There were 323 reports as com- pared with 322 for the previous year. For disorderly conduct there were 3 as against 14 in 1927, 7 for neglect of duty us against 21 in 1927, 116 for absence from Station or launch as against 226 in 1927, 15 for sleeping on duty as against 9 in 1927, 119 were reported for minor offences during 1927.

AnnualReport-1928 — Page 258

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note