K 10
INDIANS.
Three hundred and ninety-nine Indians fired their Revolver course and were classified as under :--
1st Class Shots 2nd 3rd
1923. 1922.
11 22 99 77 ... ...
270 192 30 131 399 400
CHINESE.
Three hundred and eighty-nine Chinese fired their Revolver course and were classified as under :-
1st Class Shots 2nd 3rd
55 " وو
1923. 1922.
32 36 282 102 75 382 ... 389 520
CONDUCT.
The conduct of the European Contingent (average strength 220) was good. The total number of reports against them was 106 as against 60 in 1922.
There were 9 reports for being drunk or under the influence of drink as against 5 in 1922.
Four were reported for sleeping on duty and twenty-five for neglect of duty as against 19 in 1922.
The conduct of the Indian Contingent (average strength 450) was good. There were 532 reports as against 330 for the preceding year. For drunkenness there were 23 as against 10, for disorderly conduct 30 as against 24, for neglect of duty 110 as against 87, for absence from duty 110 as against 85, for gossiping and idling on duty 81 as against 47 and for sleeping on duty 25 as against 21. 247 had no reports as against 254 in 1922.
Three Indian Policemen were convicted by the Police Magistrate and dismissed from the Force for the following offences (a) for being absent from station and duty (b) for assault and (c) for accepting bribes.
The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (average strength 733) was fair. There were altogether 1389 reports as against 977 in 1922. For drunkenness there was one case, 95 for sleeping on duty...
K 10
INDIANS.
Three hundred and ninety-nine Indians fired their Revolver course and were classified as under :--
1st Class Shots
1923. 192.2.
2nd 3rd
11
22
99
77
...
...
270
192
30
131
399
400
CHINESE.
Three hundred and eighty-nine Chinese fired their Revolver course and were classified as under :-
1st Class Shots
2nd 3rd
55
"
وو
1923.
1922.
32
36
282
102
75
382
...
389
520
CONDUCT.
The conduct of the European Contingent (average strength 220) was good. The total number of reports against them was 106 as against 60 in 1922.
There were 9 reports for being drunk or under the influence of drink as against 5 in 1922.
Four were reported for sleeping on duty and twenty-five for neglect of duty as against 19 in 1922.
The conduct of the Indian Contingent (average strength 450) was good. There were 532 reports as against 330 for the preceding year. For drunkenness there were 23 as against 10, for disorderly conduct 30 as against 24, for neglect of duty 110 as against 87, for absence from duty 110 as against 85, for gossiping and idling on duty 81 as against 47 and for sleeping on duty 25 as against 21. 247 had no reports as against 254 in 1922.
Three Indian Policemen were convicted by the Police Magis- trate and dismissed from the Force for the following offences (a) for being absent from station and duty (b) for assault and (e) for accepting bribes.
The behaviour of the Chinese Contingent (average strength 733) was fair. There were altogether 1389 reports as against 977 in 1922. For drunkenness there was one case, 95 for sleeping on
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.