CO885-(13-15) — Page 727

1194.

K

No. 10.

(SOUTH AFRICA.)

LAW OFFICERS' OPINION, SUPPLEMENTAL TO THAT OF 18Tп JANUARY.*

Questions by Mr. Chamberlain,

1. Should any British subjects continue to work the mines, or to remain in Transvaal

for this purpose?

2. Should they pay the licenses?

3. Should they pay the War Tax†?

In the event of their refusing to do all or any of these things and the mines being accordingly confiscated, should we issue l'roclamation refusing to recognise?

4. If we give instructions on any of these points do we render ourselves liable to compensation if the mines are injured and property confiscated in consequence?

January 17, 1900.

J. C.

1. We think British subjects should be allowed to remain, that is to say, no action should be taken in the matter.

2. We have dealt with this in our printed Minute, dated the 19th January.

3. We are of opinion that the War Tax should not be paid.

The remaining points are also covered by the above memorandum, except that no public notice should be given as to the payment of licenses. Intimation of the view expressed at the end of the memorandum in question should be given to the persons who have asked for advice.

R. E. W. R. B. F.

* No. 9.

†The Tax on gold imposed under Law No. 22 of 1899 (see High Commissioner's Confidential Despatch, January 23, 1900. 4642;1900).

4961-25-2; 1960 Wt 139 DES

5

PUBLIC RECORD

OFFICE

Reference :-

C.O. 885

15 PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

ALLY WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHIC- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH—NOT TO