since the last war, should be reintroduced and the number of
elected representatives possibly increased. I should also
like to see the franchise of the Urban Council extended to
include British subjects even if they do not qualify under
the provisions of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 7 of 1935.
Further, I would urge that earlier steps than were contemplated
in your despatch should be taken to devolve on the Urban Council
to the greatest extent consistent with the avoidance of over--
lapping and duplication, the real responsibility for Urban
affairs. If the basis for the appointment of members of the
Urban Council were suitably widened, there might be advantage
in associating that Council with the process for the selection
of members to the Legislative Council.
6. I need hardly stress the fact that experience in local
government work of this kind affords the best possible training
for membership of the legislative body with its wider
responsibilities, and I should hope that when replying to this
despatch you might be able to put forward constructive proposals
with the above objectives in view. So much time has already
elapsed between the publication of the "Young Plan” and the
detailed examination of the proposals submitted by you in
August 1949, that I am anxious that no undue further delay
should be incurred, more especially as the drafting work in
connection with any substantial amendment of the Constitution
cannot be undertaken in haste if it is to be done with the
care required in a matter of this importance.
7. I welcome the opportunities I have had of frank
discussion with you of these problems during your period of
leave in this country, and I trust that these discussions
will be found to have been both opportune and fruitful in
achieving more satisfactory constitutional arrangements for
Hong Kong.
Π
I have, etc.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.