CO537-6036 — Page 3

Ordinanc

Cmnideration

relative

tar

57

your

given

merit's

27

The

П

te

Colony

to the

boundare's

boun

defmed in

the

1898 Convention

and the

Possible

alternative

of

definition

based on

he

doctrine of the

three

mile

of teritorial

ز العلمية

the

1898

boundarie's

appear to

have

been

taken

the

correct

without question.

old papers - HK Vol I, 1910

-

・0.0.129

·

65]

~ N° 365 6636.

X Rong, 113°52′E does not

strike its chinese mainland

as shown - hence modificatur

An

2nd February 1910

Governa

어

despatch of the however, the

diet

Jaise

a numbe

points of uncertanity regarding

shown on morder maps. the boundaries

hat, 22° 9'N. does not

an

louch the S.W. bount of Tai A chan, south of hantao, shown in the Convention mal, but is south of it.

In marking the South

and west boundaries

certain

attached

}

arising out of

inaccuracies.

and

certain

unch

7

the

1902

they appear to have relied in

sea

on the inaccurate proclamation by the Goved. Abril 1899. Ceme 3 5 NO 159 in Eastern. Anit No. 66 - page 158). The boundary

shown

-

is consequently

in some maps as

being formed in the S.W.

corner by long. 113°52′Ẹ and

де мар

#

The 1898 Convention?"

misconceptions in the

naval office's who

surveyed and

boundaries. Some

moterve

We

whether

marked the attention

12

The question

given enjoyed the

lat. 22° 7'N and in fact territorial rights

0 24 defined in the 1911 Anterpretation Ordinance. schone The Convention map

the boundary as a line running from the sw tip of Lantas to the Sw tip of Tai A chan and must be regarded correct me.

with in

Three

miles

hautao

and

coast &

aw

༠༽

usual

الكلمة

The western

in view of

earlier how officers' opinion that

the leased territory

the

the

Jame

wan

Q

wa

in all respects

otter British territory, it

we did enjoy

considered that

such rights.

21-

however recognised