3.
In general, I am advised that, if there is a dispute,
the question of the authority of an agent to take possession
of State property on behalf of Communist Government
will be one for the Courts, and there would seem to be
4.
no reason for the Hong Kong Government to interfere
unless and until a breach of the peace was threatened.
The question in a particular case whether a person
is a duly authorised agent of the Communist Government
will be one to be decided by the Courts in accordance
with local law and rules of evidence. I note from
your telegram No. 9, paragraph 8, that questionnaire
from Chief Justice on recognition may be expected
shortly.
5.
The question of agent who may take possession
of property is quite distinct from appointment of a
quasi-diplomatic representative to replace Kwok.
SECER.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.