CO537-4800 — Page 6

пісвиднід

No 4

Ex

53852/37

meanwhil

Thing was

lin

своя

vein or hu

tem

how Effecins & it seems to be her weins of

text book

thriting loo] Au tên F.O. said in 1837

from Cô that without having sem tin Law

Preis opinion)

af

алу

vale on

was "them was a genuins lease,

paper, the residual soverceputy, so

to speak, remains in the lesson; they and melted

من أمها

cession

in practice the matte leon amounted

جميجنا

30.8

len mundes on 538

And su

hi Partein.

you now in for

153852/37.

to a

should 224 น

I think the parton cours

J

twit to his Scanbelt reporting

Lilter. 1937 correspondence) and explain that on

стертость

Eyal advisers vaid is abrose, ark whithin F.O.

1/20, whether the same to the

ague with it.

4 semmin

ment dis mininth to Daning that Mi

Fletcher looke should he authored to make a combi

Statement in

That bai's ';

and, if so, what they

have to

suggest sl. be said.

31/8

I agree; but you should add that

Lir. Fletcher Cooke is being asked to telegraph the text of the statement made by the Chinese member of the Committee. It would also be as well to add that, if a statement is to be made, it will be done before the end of the present Bession of the Committee. It is understood that the Committee would necessarily finish its labours on the 13th September but may do so before that date. It therefore seems desirable that any instructions should be sent

/ to