CO537-37 — Page 151

-->

252

fr

bla.

269".

→ Supt here and

535

of bust

because he was working in a certain``. District, and he had not squared the Inspector, arid the Inspector would not pass his work in consequence

I think so.

A.

21542

2.

And you think it is quite possible for a man to be broken up in business by an Inspector in that way,

Buch cases have occurred ?

21842

·

A.

Oh yes, I am quite sure. Of course, Man 71 Yuen has started again in Station Street.

But you think that might happen ?

43

A.

44

0.

26

Yes.

A.

21.843

21844

I am much obliged, Vr Lee, and I have no more questions to put to you. Your evidence will go before the Governor, along with that expression you gave.

I should like to draw to your notios, in regard to thage latrines, after I had reported that to Er Pearse, Inspector Lanhle, the Senior Inspector, was very much down on me for reporting it, and when I got under Inspector Reidie, I was raport id for neglect of duty, for not serving notice on a latine in Queen

Vietoria Street,

21.845-

45 0.

Is that in Reidie's District ?

A.

I should like if you would call for that report from

the office, and see it.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

CO. 537

37

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - HOT TO BE

46 0.

Do you remember when that was about. ?

2154

A.

Over a year ago. I would like to explain that Dr Pearse did not investigate that case at till.

+

47 2.

A

And were you reprimanded for not having raportad it Yes, Sir, I ws reprimanded. I did not consider the

latrine illegal.

2/14)

45 0.

A.

And what happened ultim. tely about the latrine "

It was removed.

2154

4 0.

Could you give me the number *

2

I think it was 16, -Jun not quite sure,

Queen