H
358
.5
Cleavemen
2695.
Supts dee
w
533
objections raised to the position we took up, with
regard to the advertisement we issued calling upon
people to give evidence before the Commission ↑
A.
Yes.
21:27 2.
That was very strongly spoken about?
21827
A.
Yos.
1 8
0.
And was it then decided that they should ask the
Governor to allow the Inspectors to be represented by
Counsel at the commission ?
21828
A.
Yes.
29
4.
A.
30 0.
And was the idea of the Meeting that the Commission 2/324
should be held in camera or in open Court ?
Yes, that was mentioned.
Am I right in supposing that there was a feeling 2,830
against it being held in camera, or was it not
decided I dont want to press you ↑
A.
NO
I dont remember,
2/83/
3/
Q.
And what particular idea wan expressed ? In what ma'
should the Inspectors be represented by Counsel.
Should Counsel be present at all our instings or only
in the event of an Inspector being called ?
A.
In the event of an Inspector being called before the
Commission, hoshould he attended by Counsel.
32 Re
:
2/832
I presume that the Inspectors present at that Heeting
were not aware of the fact that in the event of any
Government employee haing called hefore, the Council,
he is not represented by Counsel ?
No.
They did not know that ?
33
Q.
A.
No.
34
25
They had not taken the trouble to read the
Commissioners' Ordinance ?
A.
I dont know.
Q.
21.633
21834
probably not, otherwise that Meeting would not have 215-
been held. Then you have been for three years in the
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537
37
OUT ON OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
RECORD
LONDON
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.