CO537-3707 — Page 50

cross-examination of expert witnesses, etc.) and the views set out in (293), the case ought 66 might be taken to Court,

78.

(c) The Foreign Office would let us know whether

it was definitely a point of policy that we should not take a friendly power to the International Court. If this is the definite policy, then they will indicate whether they think the consulate-general compromise is the best course to follow, and also their views on the possible alternative course of doing nothing.

A draft telegram reference paragraph 5(a) above is submitted. It has been cleared informally with the Foreign Office though they have been warned that, since it is a personal telegram, a copy may possibly not go to them. ? Send copies or not both to Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence.

Mis I think

BRadn

29.10.48.

view that in the ambiguous

Sentences ? pera.) 7 (293) the fremm

is speaking of the King Komp pasi

prevailing with

correct,

ING..

Cart

ciz

the Aft. Wil. will serve

"It will not

it

ng

hap

will (in its last

the antiquity

too pune poves

/

pergraph convey a very necessary

dose of reality

Iween 29/10

10

1:14 To Car Singiling dump. Wt 115 Secret 597415

295 G. Wheeler, Ministry of Defence (5325/48)

4.11.48

Page 50Page 51

раба

१

and