need for the actual exercise of
jurisdiction and consequently the
practical importance of this trouble-
some question. Under our proposals,
the Hong Kong Government would continue
to exercise jurisdiction in that area
as they have for the past 50 years.
But, as already indicated, the
occasions for exercising jurisdiction
would, we hope, be ́rare.
We feel that
we can scarcely be expected to go to
the length of conceding the Chinese
claim to jurisdiction, contrary to
what we consider to be the proper legal
position.
Moreover, apart from the
legal aspect, it seems to us that the
exercise of jurisdiction by the
Chinese Government in this area of some
62 acres which is situated within
20 miles of the borders of Hong Kong
would give rise to considerable
practical difficulties, and might indeed
itself prove to be the cause of
incidents which we, and we feel sure,
the Chinese Government are so anxious
to avoid. However, since the Chinese
Government apparently consider that
the jurisdiction issue must be settled
now whatever its present or future
practical importance, there seems to
be no alternative but to refer that
question to the International Court.
We are accordingly prepared to agree
to the adoption of that course, much
as we regret that two great nations
like
•
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.