CO537-36 — Page 72

1246.

254

Янии что сбыну

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

། ། ན། །ག ། www.mmmC.O. 537

Interpreter:-

453

454

A.

A.

De Interpreter:-

Humphreys :-

4

A.

or three or four times..

Does it never take place, that sort of transaction, 182

unloa the Inspector has refused to chop the cattle,

is that 80 ?

I put it this way to him, that if he chopped all the

cattle during one year, then there would be no such

cases, and the witness says no.

Did the Inspector buy any cattle from him, except those (0453

he had refused to chop ?

No, you would not sell to him, then.

Therefore you had to pay the Inspector practically $30 10454

or $40 to chop your cattle ?

I dont give him money.

He doesnt take the question in.

When he bought back the animal, from the Inspector, ke 10485

had no difficulty in getting it marked then ?

Oh yes, he was willing.

6 9.

In fact,

he would not have bought it back at all, if it wou8b

would not be marked ?

10489

A.

YOB.

Chairman 2-

4

How many times during the present year, has this

happened. How many cattle have you sold in this way?

A.

He has not bought from me this year.

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

9

Y: Humphreyet-

490

A.

A.

A.

471

Q

Last year then - roughly?

Well, once or twice at the most last year.

10488

Have any of the other Inspectors down there, Mr Ward, wysy

or Mr Cotton, done the same thing ?

No others have.

Are those calves any fatter

are they worth any more 194ĵu

money, when they come back to him from the Inspector,

than before ?

It is not the fatness, that is the question.

They are not worth any more money when they come back, 0741

than when they go?