CO537-36 — Page 673

}

1829.

847

15187 R.

A.

A.

Mw. Le P

Mi hundeck an

gather from your evidence why you did not initial the

alterations ?

The great reason was of course that all the alterations

in the notices would be made in accordance with the

application made by the Inspector. The Inspector would

ask formally for a place to be reconcreted, and thege

words "make good" would be altered to "reconcrete" BO

as to met the application of the Inspector. This

notice is sent cn to the Inspector to serve, and

therefore any alteration in the notice would at once

be notised by the Inspector. Supposing a clerk wanted

instead of putting down to reconcrete to put down

something else, or for instance, supposing an Inspector

wanted the whole of the premises to be reanncreted and

the clerk in order to save his friend said that he only

warted to reconcrate the kitchen or yai, that would

go to the Inspector, and he would at cree notice thất

the alteration had been made.

Are the notices always served by the Inspecter who

applies for them?

•

No, they are not served by him, but they go at once

back to him, after service, Then servei, they are enter-

ed in my notics book and they are sent back to the

Senior Inspector for him to wait and ascertain when the

work has been done. All alterations ir the notices I am

now initialling. The reason why I did not do so was

because I thought that all alteratione aune by fraud

could be found out very easily.

Page 1750, half way down. "have you record of all

licenses issued, or do you satisfy you self that the

Senior Inspector" keep a record". The - 10 E to that

question honla he "Yes", seem to h... gone on to

another subject.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

། ། ། www.C.O. 537

36

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

RECORD OFFICE,

LONDON

%