CO537-36 — Page 670

f

1576

A.

bleauruan

1826.

844

are now allowed to serve the notices. The notices are

■ent out to the Inspector to serve, and the Inspector

instructs the foreman to do it.

Has the Inspector got authority to do that?

15764

I have never given authority. It would come under the

M. O. H. to do that.

65-20

Would it not meet the case to a certain extent if you

15765-

A.

had all these forms bound in a book, with counterfoils ?

It is scarcely possible, because in a year, as I have told the Commission, I have 8,000 to serve, and these

and are served in duplicate. That would make 16,000, those of the Building Authority would mean another 4,000 That is, I handlg 20,000 in a year, and in regard to

1 etters, these are also in duplicate, and that would

m san another 10,000, and if they were locked up

15766

66

A.

I dont mean lock them up. Keep them in counterfoil. Xy suggestion is to keep them in a book with counterfoils. If you kept them in a book with counterfoila, then I would have to handle 40,000.

Mr Shelton Hooper:-

15767

ኤ

X

67

A.

68 00

A.

Could you not get cvar it this way: Instead of a counterfoil, to have them bound in a book, but with multiplex paper. You write out the motios, and it forms its om counterfoil, without having the double duty of writing the thing again, because now you use pencil for writing notices, and if you get multiplex paper, the weight of the pencil gives you the facsimile of your autograph, so that you only sign one. Do you use carbon paper today ?

Yes, I use that today.

Then what is the objection to using it in future ↑ 14763

I am giving objection on the ground that we at present use carbon paper for the duplicats, and if we use it

!

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

361

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO B

な

Page 670Page 671