CO537-36 — Page 617

Per

J

ཀྭ་་་

1774.

"ohlcrine".

791

A.

He might.

ør Shelton Hooper:» I must state definitely that I deny that, because I

came here with the intention of putting it, from a letter which I have seen from Clayton's people, in which they spoke of the specific gravity of sulphate dioxide, uned in their disinfecting apparatus, and if there is any question about it, I would ask that the

C. S. 0. he sent for.

Witness:-

The same remark as to having a building sealed up, applies to fumigation with Clayton's apparatus, as to ohlorine, so that it does not make any difference to my

answer.

Ir Shelton Hooper:-

Your answer is that you did not may 34.8.

14841

14841

A.

My answer is down as 34,5, while the specific gravity

of chlorine is 35.5.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537.

BE

COPYRIGHT PHYTOGRAP WITH

REPRODUCED

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

A.

изво

A.

Therefore you did not give that answer, as recorded 14842

here ?

I thought 36.5, but I am down as having said 34.5, I

should like, seeing that I was answering with the

chlorine in my mind, it put down as 35,5, instead of

34,5.

Koo

I should like the question altered te, considering I 14843

never said it.

I was under the impression all the time that I was

asked the specific grayity of chlorine.

I can understand that, when you have been sitting for 14,44

de Chairman :-

44

an hour or two, under cross examination, you might have

A.

made use of the wrong word. It soms to me that it

meets the case quite well, if we now say that what you

really meant to talk about ma sulphate dioxide. The spooifig gravity of sulphate dioxide ía 39, as I

الجيد