CO537-36 — Page 555

1

ما

1714.

Umin C...

-

730

14438 9.

Do you think that would be more acceptable to the 14438

public?

A.

A.

40 2.

A.

Certainly yes.

And dont you think the interests of the Government 14439 would be as well looked after and. as sanitary and strong

buildings erected as today ?

Certainly.

14440

Wouldnt it also be a saving of money to proprietors in

not having to provide extra plans ?

I dont charge my clients anything extra fost drainege

plans.

14441

Do you think that any amendment on these lines would he an improvement in the Ordinance ?

A.

Certainly, yes. I think the time is wasted in entering up in one Department, sending by chit book to another Department, reentering there, and sending back again by chit book. If it were all in one building, the plans

need not leave that building.

i

i

The Chairman:-

42

You say that in Sydney your plans could be parsed 14442

generally while you waited ?

A.

Yes.

Q.

43

What was the fonn of Government

Government ?

-

was it a Municipal 14443

A.

Yes, Municipal Government.

44

A Mayor and so forth elected by the ratepayers ▼

14444

A.

Yes.

14.44

45-20

And the Sanitary Surveyor was equivalent to the Borough

Engineer?

A.

Yes.

446

And in a place like Sydney, would thers be a large 14 ↳

staff, do you happen to know ↑

A.

There would be a dozen men.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

། ་། ། །

C.O. 537

36

COPYRIM PHOTO TUVALLY WITH-

PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE PUBLIC

OUT PERMISSION

REPRODUCED P

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

Page 555Page 556

4.7