CO537-36 — Page 532

JOT

14261

1692.

Mile 107

and-Ɛher would be on urinals ciator, and dirty sowte

inter in the day. The city did the washing »f the dirty

adurta.

144.267

You know nothing about internal limewashing in commen

lodging houses at home ▼

A.

To.

14262

6200

A.

63 20

Well, from your experience haré, - you have been here

some tims - do you think from a health point of view,

that it is necessary to do all these houses twice a

year?

I think they are all the better for it.

Do you think do you know Wang Ring and Look Hing'■ 14263

shops dowi in Queens Road ↑

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

wwwwwwww.C.O. 537

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

A.

Хов.

6x Q.

A.

65-Qu

The Chairman:=

66

A.

As

67 8

14.264

Do you think that such places as these are the better of

having it done twice a year, if they come within the

law?

I fancy they might discriminate, and allow discretion

somewhere.

14265

Dont you think, if you were asked to discriminate, that

with your knowledge, and with very little trouble, and

the aid of a map, you could roughly sketch out whole

areas that should be exempt from limewashing twice a

year?

I should think it might be reduced, and thạt it might

be left to the M. O. H. or someone in authority,

high officer - to discriminate.

BONG

14266

The lime we get here, being shell line, is not suitab o

for limewashing, but is suitable for concreting ↑

If it is a pure fat lime, it ought to be suitable fo

limewashing. It is more suitable for limewashing, May

it is for concreting.

14267

Dr Pearne says in his evidenɑs,"lima used for likes, h” ing would he eminently unsuitable for concrete, for