CO537-36 — Page 503

55a

ما

Fonds del Godnoti

st

ALO •▼ „30 winen - ale løgmka bremen av gionaleg az

1665.

4. Reanse ent

678

Mr holten Hooper;"

14048

Would it be legal to turf it ↑

Page

1784

turf it.

If foul water in throw there, it would be legal te

i

14048

R

14049

2

wonde A 193am Iurt oveď

of aloog trengste seran od ma zal oa

9anketun pied

„îpa (misemmes mausted,Jant teed 63 bataya,jni nus I

betongent bi:6 1.98 self to euvad vana

11

KNA

61 @adt Dm6 (¿*deloai vienigme si sarın Ek 16osid,

unt To sibbla ods, ni gnibilud esinduɔn cha

bat muros (** *\*J**up =Jükripe ed? 33 Samuti odd mult

ottnak berezad ghala za 31 galbilud Jede buoyed„

FAB „NI 20 Kinon unt statoman of am bytebno Torositat

pilaw and ai selon est qu LIN

asian just unade kon par dirat netsed to asta ser II

at gøre brøy sát to a suxe at aww ona zimondó uɛm

trend:100 #sw netlostotenyent and jeapon and ya

.wsi

ERVA as Eat DoY, END JAN

„Í BRUGT die soaqe nojo gid - rad savoı yü

jeona lain:2raqwa Jaeioi1twa tog nad 21 bebivo:9

Svar Jas

loud eric to

$1 Born to Xonɗ tit bon kog ob didw

=27&py to

The Chairman t❤

50

A.

Would you go so far as to say that it would be ̧)

to turf it, because coolies have to pass over it, and

in passing over it, they drop slops ↑

Not necessarily dropping shops. If slops are throm

over it, I gather it has to be concret ed.

14050 Even if you have your servants yard 50 yards away from

your house ?

A.

strictly speaking, that is what the law says.

thing to do with your slop water, it is well known,

to throw it over the lawn.

14057

Mr Shelton Hooper:-

57

The law says the concrete surface must be impervious

to damp, and maintained as such. Supposing after 12

months, you were to take that up, and get a fair pootie

of it, and find that l† inches at the botton had bəcəmd

sodden with water, but notwithstanding that, you had tà

inches that was still impervious, would you call that

nuisance ?

14052

A

It is probably not a nuisance.

Q..

J-2--

-:nequus moji:

Could you call upon a man to maintain that floer, te

reconcrete it, admitting for the moment that it is

perfectly impervious ↑

I dont know if you could under section 112 compel, a ma

A.

d.

d

wift no vORITY?

TH

M..

TAMPOTO &

t:

al ni dokt

• ៧៖

fax

sted woy 17

Burlap

At Fedt

t

Fd!

3

to reconcrets, because 1ƒ inches at the bottom of six

inches of congrete had perished. It does not follow

that the whole of the concrete has perished.

quits so, that is my point, could you call upon a

to raconorete ?

14053

A.

54

14051 I should think it would be a very unnecessary procedure.

supposing you had the administration of the Ordinance,

and you were ordered to carry it out to the letter, do

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

TCO. 537

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE