J
#1
1
16422
A.
1454.
Cheng Po Stran
465
12488
Did you speak to Conolly yourself about it. How was the
arrangement first made ↑ That is what I want to know.
Leung In dannot tell me.
No, I did not speak with Conolly. I dont know him. Well,
the matter arose in this way, that O'Keiff arrested
people, and they went to gaol. That is how the matter
arose.
What I want to know is with whom the arrangement was 2489
made that $55 a month should be paid to Conolly.
You say you never saw Conolly.
That is so. There was a boy, said to be O'Reift's bay,
84 Q.
A.
so it is said, that he spoke about the amount.
With whom did he speak ↑
A.
Mr Fung wa Chun:-
A.
4i Q.
12440
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
With my men. The foremen came back and told about it.
There was no help for it, when these men were arrested.
You just told the Commission that Inspector O'Keiff (2491
gave you a lot of trouble, because you could not
arrange with your firm to pay $55 a month to Conolly.
No, given to O'Keiff.
You dont understand my question. My question is this -1249%
think over it, Inspector O'Keiff came to your firm ↑
A.
Well, I dont know about his coming.
But you have
we heard about it.?
12493
Well, I dont think he came. It was spoken about at his
place.
१५०
In O'Keiff's place?
12494
A.
Yes.
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
Did O'Keiff send for your men then ↑
12495
A.
Yes, that was his custom.
Q.
Did O'Keiff send for your men, to discus that up at 12496
O'Keiff's house ?
A.
Yes, that is it. He constantly wrote letters.
Who?
12497
A.
No, not letters a piece of paper.
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.