1303.
312 A. Small ex
1100: 0.
A.
What was the date, when he passed them formerly 11007
I cannot tell you at present, Bir.
The Chairman:20 8
About wew long ago - thì as years ?
11-008
A.
yr Shelton Hooper:-
009
A.
About thru or five years, or something of that sort. Were you with him, when he previously inspected them Hooq
I dont remember.
11.610
The Chairman;-
010
A.
Why did he pass the three or four years ago, and then
condemn them?
They were new houses. Now, there are casen of plague in a couple of houses in this blook, and Inspector MacKenzie wrote in, asking that the ground surface be inspected,
--------- and Mr Bryan
"ound that the concrete was bad,
and recommended that the ower be called upog to put two inches of concrete on the surface. Had it beer. anyone else who passed the concrete on these floors, they would
have had to regoncrate.
(0.01)
011
Q.
How do you know that they would have been called upon
to reconcrete ?
A.
012
:
A.
013
Q.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
། །
19
Reference:-
C.O. 537
If the concrete is of bad quality, a notice generally
goes in for reconcreting. Here, you have the wround surface of the house bad, the tiles bad, and the kitchen cone: ete, and the tiles on the concrete, good.
11.012.
Now, you were with him, when he made the insection ?
Yes.
And the result of that, and his report, was a notice-013 served to put on two inches on top ?
I dont know whether a notice has been served or not.
That was his recommendation.
11.014
You have not been with him sinoa, to see what was done ?
A.
614
0.
A.
No.
You dont know if he has been there
36
10015
11.016
You dont mean the tiles bad, you mean the concrete bad ↑
A.
NO.
ur Fung wa Chuni-
Дов
A.
YOS.
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.