CO537-35 — Page 83

At.

83

Section 14

t

h's Amps.

Hacks

containing provisim for the conivet af the business of the

Board, between Mastings, By Ordinance ki of 1905, Section 5

that provisina was struck out. You might read that and you

will see better what I aman

A: (Remla Seotira 14 of Ordinance 1 of 1908)

Q1- The Board onuld make Standing Orders for the conduct of

business between its fortzightly mastings 7

492

A:-

Q:-

18 492

Sectira 14 dnes not say anything about conduct between meet-

-zags ?

Take Ordinance 32 of 1905 section 5.

(Qurtes Ordinance 23 of 1908 section 5) "The Board may from

493

time to time nike Standing orders for the conduct of its

business between such meetings and for the guidance" etc

When they amended that Ordinance these words were deleted ? 494.

The words

"

for the conduct of its qusinsaa hetreen such meetings" -

Will you tell me who is responsible for the conduct of the business between the fortnightly meetings, these words having

been taken out of the Ordinance ?

41– 1 take it the President. It is not definitely statal

Oivil

g:- How 1 ask your opinion, You as Principle Hetical officer

446

and President of the Board consider it is the President who

is responsible, Now, Dr Clark I would ask you whether you

wuggested that f

I did pog. I was on lo-ve at the tins.

Lou were 15 Magland at the time ↑

495

496

Ire

qi. Ware you consulted about the proposed alterations er amend-

495

S

-mate by the Colangal ofrios ?

497

498

Q1= You know nothing af the Ūrtinw.ge being suendod ↑

#99

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

35 RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO RE