CO537-35 — Page 28

1

27.

28

178 02-

ורי

think it in the Interpreters who are in blane, Auduthing Then you think it would be advisable in the interest of 178.

the Community for the satisfactory working of a veng

Ordinance that sone punishment should be ficted if

could prova Imakage of information ?

Atm Ios, if you can bring it how tɔ than.

Aratic

st

179

Qi- But, at ti: present moment, even if yo, convict a an

leakage of informati..., you can't. pondat hi in any g,

A:-

On and you report his and dimmies hin 7

Ins, I could punish him, of course, 1o several cases occurre

180

We should probably dispenue with his service

A mat would have to do a good deul before you i

astogethe

180

stop?

A:-

I suppose we could fine him before that.

188

QI-

What I want to know 1: whether, of your knowledge, you

181

thin 11 advinelle that some further powers shoul? he pin

to meet case. of this sort on it night lead to great shumea?

At-

Yes.

182 Q1- This has a very goat berring it

recommendation if we are satisfied -

01 1.2.

182

Aim

·

The Chalt VARI-

Sectior. 18 neglect or breach of duty

take the responsibility of fining

It is a very small penalty ?

W

I think age woull

Դ

man for that.

183

183

At Only ten dollars.

Shelton Hoopert- The Interpreter i; a vant of the Board ?

184

Atm Ies

184

185-00-01d you not malo ticrecy a conlition of his appointment 185

and then it could be a breach of duty ?

At- Yes.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

wwww www.C.O. 537

35

NOT TO BE

COPYRIGHT PHOGUN ANLY WITH

REPRODUCED I

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC