CO537-35 — Page 243

A

}

mr Humphriego.

239.

242

The notice is hare itself to show that it was only a broken

pane of glags ?

A: That is put in by Palmer and Turner. This notice had been

gent to me saying that that is a contravention of thin

section. The amount of the contravention would not be utalod

on the application for the notice and probably I should have

no means of telling 0-1 in this particular case. The putt-

-ing in ^.. Dâue of 23 xan would meat the case but so far as putting in plang is concernet, I had no og tiam in the utter

I have sy kẹn ✨ the Building Authority and also to Hr Chai-

-hari «bout the matte and I have instanced a case «hich is

jual as bad as thut. Iou can have a contravention and the

<hn3w of the contravention might be only a broken pans of

In such a Cane may I go, and tại? the man he went pub

.

gend in 1.a? THAY NÀY

轉

No, I could not " I have abane

-Tutely no porer. If a m coves to 19 und asks mg: Is it

LUG-BAAYT "Or him t· gend in a plan ↑ I may to him I have

.

absolutely no power in this miller. I ́ it in a trivil

» I sho 11 advise you to go and se- the Building Autho-

astfor

つま

ue Hr Clation * 1 1 utenge in at the same

time that Mr C) (thalu pome" in conusotion with this ng deng

szall anloed. Speaking from memory I believe it is reb.

the outlying diabilel- not in the Oing of Vistorka that. Me

Chuchan home?? Nas ang pver to »xcuse

-tud.

18an to úg muhnit-

Đ! Wha yu hơn id in the beginning of that Tugt ar VEDT

exonerates you bucnome the Inspo,'air' home pot shals eXAGST,

ahab dg wanted, but it does not exon rate him and it piy

monia care agli Atual; the fact that, landlords zul ten ple

59olutely in the hands of the Insjaotnes in regard to

building buticna ?

1474

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

TELLICO. 532

35

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO LE

RECORD OFFICE,

LORDON