CO537-2188 — Page 414

from "Suggestions" to

"

mi du second

ant

"acthere to my xx cragginall

proposals and "

Despacio highs alo

вс

aurender is.

beciwsary in legen And also you

m

suggestivin in

Carl setân

of this faca. раса

points have been raised here from publication

aspect:-

I.

Under mentioned passages in your

despatch might give rise to unnecessary contro-

versy and misunderstanding and it might therefore

be desirable to delete them before publication.

(a) From "although" in line 2 of paragraph 2

to "it" in line 4 of that paragraph.

Last two sentences of paragraph 9.

m Last three sentences of paragraph 15,

(b)

(c)

II.

Reference in paragraph 8 to discussions.

with Chinese representative bodies and/or mention

of their names might embarrass those bodies or

affect their ability or willingness to co-operate

in the future. If this is likely reference might

be amended and names deleted.

III.

Proposals in your despatch might be

my

amended in light of, decision on point (b) in

3

paragraph above, so that it will not be necessary

to refer to this somewhat delicate point in my

reply.

IV.

Suggestion for reducing minimum age

3 A

1

Subject to расоўсары

above,

On lines of

the Last outma

in

б

in case of members of Council from 30 years to

25 years will be made in my reply unless you would

prefer to amend proposals in your despatch on

this point.

V. Z Reference to understanding agreed to

in comments on point (a) in your telegram No.406

will be included in my reply.

VI.

If you agree, on reconsideration,

that nominees of trade unions should be increased

4

to three - see paragraph - proposals in your

despatch might be amended so that it will not be

necessary to make this point in my reply.

VII.

point (g)es-in paragraph $6

Comment will be made in my reply on

/VIII