Cleartman
A.
16020
Q.
A.
21
Q.
A.
1962.
4. Clicker
972
great measure abolished in the Colony, du you. think
that that was the intention of the framers of the
Ordinance, or do you think the result has been somewhat
more extreme than was anticipated ?
I dont remember what the actual words of Simpson and Chadwick's Report were, but I know that Professof
Simpson expressed to me the opinion that cubicles, as
they obtained in this Colony, at the time of his
inspection, ought to be abolished.
Absolutely?
Absolutely.
16.020
And so you think that in the working of the Act, we 16021
have not got a more extreme res." than anticipated ?
16022
I dont think we have gone so far as he expected.
No, I am not quite talking so much of Professor Simpson's ideas, - I am talking more of the idea of
the Government, of which you were a member, when you
framed the ordinance. Did you think you get that
result, or something more savore :
A.
No, I dont think we have got any repult, which was
more severe.
16023
Q.
And so you think you have got the condition that was
intended by the framers of the Ordinance ?
A.
I think so, yes.
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
A.
No, I dont think so.
25-
A.
Dont you think they are impracticable ?
To carry it out as the law is in 1903. - I will put it
another way,
wasnt it found to be so harsh and
unworkable that the Government had to amend it by a
later Ordinance of that year?
I dont see that the new cubicle regulations are very
much better than the old cubicle regulations.
16024
16.025
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Referance:-
C.O. 537
361
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.