CO537-(36-37) — Page 600

9.8

2440.

Si Man Chunext

321

was required to reconcrete. I requested that they would examine it with me, really that it was necessary

to look at it carefully.

Mr Lau Chu Pak: -

No,

The Interpretar:-

Mr Lau Chu Pak: -

19659

Mr Ball, "to examine it carefully before they

passed it".

To esmine it carefully, and say whether they were

proper or not.

19659

Didnt you mean to say this: I built the houses in 1900, and am now required to reconcrete in 1903, only thres

years after?

Yes.

And you wrote to the Sanitary Board?

لافا

Q.

A.

Yes.

ва

4.

A.

19660

You wrote "I want the Sanitary Board to examine the 1966¢ concrete this time more carefully" ?

Yes.

As much as to say "Do hot. pass it, unless you are 19662

perfectly satisfied" ?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Well, go on.

A.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

GO. 537

19.663

I said I had not collected much rent, on this property, and if the places had to be reconcreted, there would probably be more than half a year's rent gone on it,

Mr Fung We Chun-

A.

Mr Sheltor. Hopper: -

انا

"Nearly a half year ↑

19664

Yes, nearly a half year.

And what did the Sanitary Board say in answer to iqli5

your application?

37

A.

66

-

A.

C

They did not answer me at first, - no answer I got.

then? Did you do anything to those floors,

I did, I reconcreted.

19666

The chairman: »

67

A.

Did you entirely reconcrete, or only repair them ? Those which were said to be not right, I reccnoreted

completely.

19667

Mr Fung Wa Chun:-

Have you been troubled again ?

Mr galton Hooper:-

But in answer to that, did you ever hear anything more

19668

( &

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO HE

Page 600Page 601

1.8