9.S
ए
вістяной
1986390
2382.
that the work was satisfactory.
In Blood
211
18863
And had any alterations been carried out under your
supervision
A.
None at all.
64
Q.
18864
So you were merely writing all these months, to get a
reply from the Sanitary Board, that the work carried
out on Mr чarker's plan, and on which a can had been
fined $40, was correct?
A.
Yes.
6:
Q
That is so?
A.
Yes.
66
Q..
A.
67
Q.
A.
68
Q.
A.
18863-
And no alterations had been made in the interval qnibl
No alteration that I am aware of. None were made under
our supervision.
And you were, after two and a half months, informed (186)
officially that the work was correct ?
They informed us that the work required by the notice
had been carried out.
And as a matter of fact, the work we tre original #868
work carried out by the man, and was passed ?
80 far as I know,
18869
Could it have been possible for any change to have been
made in that building, without your knowledge •
A.
Yes.
18870
70 0.
The man was fired on the 5th Seṛtembar. You visited the
building on the 9th, after he was fined ?
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
A.
Yes.
71 4.
A.
72 Q.
A.
And in your opinion, the building was in the same
condition as when you last saw the building ↑
I only saw the building once.
18671
And it took you all that time to find out from the 18872-
Sanitary Department, whother the work was proper or
not?
You.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.