CO537-(36-37) — Page 456

2300.

J. Bryan End.

179

think that many graves exceed the regulation size ?

18568

A.

Only in the old section.

195-6700

And what do you call the old section ?

18567

A.

Well, it is a portion that has not been buried in, to

....

my knowledge, except that case that cocu-red last year,

·

since 1895, I think, certainly, not in my time,

62

And do you know why they ceased to bury in that section-

Was it by order ?

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

זור יהודה

Reference:-

GO. 537

A.

I believe there was very little application for this section. That is what I was told by Kr Crooks.

69 Q

But it was still open to anyone to choose a grave

space in that section?

18569

A.

I presume so, because the Bye Laws state they can do

so. I dont think anyone would have bam refused.

>>

Q.

And this is the only case ?

19570

A.

Within my knowledge, yas.

7 Q.

of As)/

Now in this case, where the grave exseeded it, course the actual space occupied by the body did not exceed it, - I take it, it was the embellishment all

round it ?

·

A.

Exactly, Sir.

18572

74 20

And do they mark out a grave site, when one is chosen, by posts at all, showing the limits on the ground ?

A.

18573

}}

A.

Yes. I have gone up and down it myself occasionally,

In sections D and E, the sexton should mark out by

stakes.

He should ?

so that there should be no mistake, when extra ground

has been required, în prount Caroline, I have been up on

37

several occasions, and marked it off myself.

74 0.

Now, do you remember a case in which a grave exoseded 2,000 feet on wount Carolina ?

6574

A.

Yes, I do. I reported several of them,

75 20

185.25

Through whose fault, the fault of which officer could

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE