e
Mr. S. Hop
2135.
In Agh enz
10
Tooal Board. The Surveyor being ill for a long
they appointed me in his absence.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537
173/4 0.
A.
Would plans be examined and passed quicker ?
Yes.
15 Q.
.A.
A.
17.
A.
17314
The present system of sending part of the plan
to the Building Authority, and part to the Sanitary Board, increases the number of drawings to be examined, and takes up time in conveying plans from Building
Authority to Sanitary Board and vice versa.
What is about the average time here, between sending in
plans for approval of Building Authority and Sanitary Roard, and the receipt of permit to proceed ↑
17315
It is impossible to make an average. The time varies
from 12 days to six months. We are still without
acknowledgement of plans sent in on March 10th, 1906.
See also my reply to printed question, No 3, dated July
23rd 1908. That reply gives specific dates and
instances.
What is your experience as regards the time for so 7316
doing, in England ↑
I have put in plans at West Ham, and got them passed
next day, also I have had to wait a month owing to
special points. I should say a reasonable time to allow
would be one week.
Do you think the appointment of an Executive Engineer,/7/7
and a vedical Officer of Health, as Advisers to the
Sanitary Board, would be an improvement in the general
administration of the Ordinance ♦
Yes. I suggest that plans should be considered by an
Authority composed of four official and six unofficial
Members, with a non technical Chairman, and advised by
non voting experts in Law, Medicine, and Engineering.
The Chairman:
18
Law?
A.
There are many legal points that arise.
17218
37
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.