CO537-(36-37) — Page 195

arat

لیہ

2051. ?

Int5. Hoople.

•

1073

Jaskin and

were they carefully considered before they were made a

part of the ordinance by schedul♦ ↑

A.

They already existed in the previous grdinance.

1

16645

But were they revised, or considered at all ?

46.645-

46 Q.

I suppose they were considered by the Committee that

practically formed this ordinance 1 of 1903.

16646

Now, will you turn to page 90, under Cemeteries, Humber

11, "a plan of the Cemetery or a tracing thereof as

laid out shall be on view at or near to the Cemetery,

and at the offices of the Board". Do you know if that

in carried out ?

A.

YOB.

47

Q.

It is ?

A.

Yes.

48 Q.

A.

49.4.

ש

A.

57 Q.

A.

52.2.

A.

63 9

16.647

16648

Well, Dr Atkinson, the Aoting President of the Board

stated officially in the Board, in your absence, that

it was not carried out, because it mɛ not practicable.

But the Surveyor has it. I have sean it.

161649

But he has stated that it is not carried out, because

it is not practicable.

A plan of the Cemetery is kept by the Surveyor. That

is at the offices of the Board, is it not

But at or near the Cemetery ↑

And at the offices of the Board.

Therefore I take it there are two plans ↑

16.650

16-657

I dont know if there is one at the Cemetery, because I

have not been down there to see. I presume there is. Your predecessor stated there was no plan at the 16-652 Cemetery, because it was not practicable.

But he did not say "at the offices of the Board”.

16.653 I did not ask him that. We were told by the Administras-

ive Read of the Department that part of the Bye Law is

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537.

36

COPYRIGHT PORNSTAROMLY WITH-

REPRODUCED

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

• NOT TO BE

Page 195Page 196