$201
!
ht
9031.
Health and Buildings Ordinance 1905 ↑
Yes.
1053
Me Blood and
16578
A.
19
16578
1
Did you also receive from them notice dated 9th
October 1906, in respect of Numbers 3 and 7 Tank Lane,
calling attention to a montravention of section 183 of
the Pablic Health and Building Ordinance of 1905 ↑
Yes.
Is not this second lot of notices dated 9th October, 16519 esaling upan you to do the same work, that you had sent
in plans for on the 1st August ↑
A.
Ten, they are the same.
16520
204.
And it would be illegal for us to commence until it had
been approved by the Building Authority ?
A
Yes, that is so.
The Chairman:-
21
Both batches of notices relate to agnatly the same
work 1
16521
A
YOU,
22 Q.
Ir Shelton Hooper:-
And they are dated about seven months apart ↑
It doesnt matter for that.
16522
23 Q.
Did you on lst August in sending in a plan send in a 16523 notice to the Building Authority, in accordance with
schedule K of the ordinance, which ma duly signad by
the Hongkong Bank as owners of that property ↑
A.
Yes.
16524
Did you also send in on that date a notice to the Building Authority certifying that the building will
be structurally capable of bearing he weight and strain of the amendsent proposed to be made in accord-
ance with the plan ?
And ifthis a copy of the plan you sent in ?
A.
Yes.
250
A.
YOB.
26 Q.
Did you on the 13th of that mearth receive from the
16525
16526
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
www.mmm...O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Page 175Page 176
8201
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.