CO537-(35-36) — Page 385

-:

*

è nata por sere cond

877.

893

Hurk Waing His sack

Mr Fung wa Chun:-

A.

7116 4.

A.

Mr Shelton Hooper:-

7"7

be reconcreted.

Supposing you had not got those two papers, would you 7/157 have claimed your money back?

I trusted Mok. I did not trust the other man. He would not need to put down the concrete when you give him the two papers, and have them signed as proper.

you?116

Supposing you did not get that paper signed, would you'

alaim your $250 back ?

Well, he promised to get them signed.

You said just now that when you were bargaining with 7′′7 them, and they wanted $275, you said the sonorete has already been done. How long previous to that, had they done any concreting in that place ↑

A.

A long time ago.

Do you remember it ever being concreted yourself ?

7118

A.

Between 10 and 20 years ago.

Do you know that as a fact -

that you saw it, or you 719

were told that it was done then?

A.

7/20 0.

I have been there 20 years. I saw it done. Now do you remember who the contractor was,

that did 7/20

it ?

A.

Mr Lau Chu Pak:-

A man surnamed To. The business style is To Pui Kes.

Is he still here ?

7121

A.

He is.

Į

Mr Shelton Hooper:-

7/24

A.

Where does he live↑

Lower Lascar Row -

I dont know the number.

7/2 Q.

7121

7122

Now when they dug that hole to examine the concrete, 7123

was it before Inspector Gidley saw it ?

A.

Yes.

7124 Q.

Vas it in good condition as

ir as you could see ?

7124

A.

The Chairman ? -

7/25

I was not there. I was out about accounts. There were

other fokis there.

Do you know anything about further trouble, which took 7/25′′)

place about two houses in Bozku. Strand and Wing Lok

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

THC.O. 537

35

REPRODUCED PHOTOPHICALLY WITH-

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

OUT PERMISSION

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

PUBLIC

Page 385Page 386