CO537-(35-36) — Page 20

183

his Horqu

524.

532

& Pearce

3980

And he was supposed to give a certificate for it?

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

A:-

Yes, I presume so.

39519:0

Was this one of the reasons why he was to be invalided ?398

A:- It must be so.

34890:- You must have a very poor opinion of his capabilities 183782 you wanted him invalided to prevent any scandal

A:-

3559 Q:-

A:-

Mr Lau chu Paki-

345

*

Mr Humphreys:-

1485

A:-

A:-

to get him quietly out of the service.

He was suffering at the time from a bad knee.

·

trying

So you thought it was good enough to get him out of the 3483 Government service on the strength of it ?

I should have been very pleased if he had been invalided.

Have you ever had anything against Sam Iu ?

I dont remember anything against Sam Iu.

3984

What advantage could it possibly have been for Mr Bryan 3985′′)

to say a trench had been paid for if it had not been

paid for? Did Mr Bryan receive the money ?

I could not say that.

Would it be Government Work ?

I understand it is done by the Sanitary „epartment

3486

3487

You dont know how payment would be made for work of that

A:-

3989980

Bort ?

A:-

No, Sir, I cannot tell you. I understand there is a special contract for laying out the cemeteries,

turfing,

3988

and laying channel.

35589;-

Mr Bryan settled it by paying half over

agein ?

A:-

I cannot say that that was the actual settlement,

but

that was the conversation.

35

89

Q:-

A 2

Q:-

3990.

Who could tell us definitely about that?

3989

Dr Macfarlane could corroborate what I said about the

conversation.

I want to trace the actual payments. Would the Secretar:

or the President be the proper person to tell us i

I think it should be the Secretary.

3990

A:-

35

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

Page 20Page 21