CO537-(35-36) — Page 120

630

619.

For like...

At-

Well, frem appearance,

I should think there were a

number, but I cannot say, I only think it.

Yr Shelton Huoperi-

Appearance of what ?

4799

4799A2-

People say that Lo Man Kai has got a share.

The Chairman:-

Do you think that is true?

4800

·800 AS-

Com

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

4804

I dont know it.

Q:-. How long is it since you heard that Lo Man Kai was a 4801'

A:-

ટૂંક ૧ ૧૪-

AS-

Þartner?

:

I have heard a long time, but my subcontractor said to me a while ago "Why is it that the soffins, when I have got the tender for them, have been given to Man Hing! That is all I know. I dont know the rest.

4802

Did your subcontractor suggest then that Lo Man Kai had #789

an interest in the Man Hing ↑

It was given to him. He said "You had it, and it was given to Man Hing". I said "Probably it is not Lo Man Kai's decision". The decision was not probably with him,

35

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

4808 98-

on account of that matter, that my subcontractor supposed that Lo Man Kai had a share in the Man Hing.

What is the name of your subcontractor ↑

4803

At-

Chung Li.

4864

Q:-

Where does. he live ?

4804

At-

480598-

"

A1-

Yr Lau Chu Paki-

It is just the same as Sam Iu. Sam Iu has given a

subcontract, to him as well.

Do you mean to say that although the contract was taken away from you, and given to Sam Iu, the same subcontractor does the work? Is that what you mean ?

No, it is not the same subcontractor.

His idea is thin: Bam Iu is subcontractor for plague works, and Sam Iu again lets it to another man. Chung Li is the third party • sub subcontractor is what he means. Chung Li suggested to him that because the making: of ooffing was taken away from him, Lo Kan Kai might be

Page 120Page 121