CO537-(184-198) — Page 464

Reference:-

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

CO 537/190

COPYRIGHT NOT TO BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITHOUT PERMISSION

>

6

rmanently stationed

[ them in order, theis

è annual charge

They

все но гасени

026

is should not suffice

vier guns, nor do they

& damage than would

ferent armament ___

in Either case there

in guarding -

there

le difference in the

i batteries, whichever

L

were mounted

: Expense may be said

I first cost of the

1

from its being

au

the cheaper orduance,,

cou

of the

Committee be

teful expenditure of

recer,

which when

5

Reference:-

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

CO 537/190

COPYRIGHT NOT TO BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITHOUT PERMISSION

mounted will afford no real security_

Naving

so far dealt with the principles the Committee have little to remark upon the detailed proposals of Sir E. Selby bugth as regards the several forts. They

to modify

все но челни

the suggestions Cretained in their Report, and are sucable to concur with the Lieut. General in the

chaceges of situation of some of the batteries,

which

he recommends - their suggestions were the result

of very careful consideration of the circumstances grach case, and were

framed with coery desire

ба

to keep down the cost to the lowest figure, consistantly with securing a real, though by

In ques

perfect defence. _ They find nothing in the papers before them to lead them to a different opinion.

however glad to obarve the crefidume

1. they

ace

"Which Sir E. Selby Sungth cntertains in the ability of the local Militia to mean the proposed defences.

The thuisons. Hang Barkly