CO537-(1262-1649) — Page 932

00039

4.12.4f

3 morning

ayle asking him

ture of Hong Kong. conclude it is

refore send

may be seen.

he conclusion

ake the

sions with

riel

olic opinion

2.

to the text

ons in paras (a) he meeting is

time to do more

se amendments.

this by telephone,

and Harbour 01

ss adequate

certuin that the

eriously

the lease of'

ion, particularly

ut the top of

I suggest

be mentioned ation in

45.

copy of the the F..(0)

arned to attend Lace at

suggested by

somewhat

ird is, of

>r's own

this with me

Ight, with

be done by

ey out of the

and this

►

the paper comes

gthening of the

the Governor's

above amendments

10.12.46.

1

cms

Ref.:

CO 537/1649

THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES

Ins

2

Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the National Archives' terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright

restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply

of

National Archives' leaflet

world of 1947 file.

Net Cab ffres

00040

Extract from FE(0) (46) 141 Bultz

Mr Marko

Нот

11 12 46

wish

Jou

jounsely

unders

Lowvel

plepar

1to Everes

Aleks

75 F.o.

tel. 876 fr. Namking to F.O.

27 Aide Memoire for 5.675

M. FO.

18. Minute by Mr. Mayle.

Mr.

17-12-462

17-47

3-1--

47

10-1 47

Sir Thomas Lloyd

You will recall that when the F.E.(0) Committee considered our paper on Hong Kong on the 11th December (minutes at 74) it was generally agreed that the paper should be revised in certain respects and that it should go further than the original paper and set out the case for our retaining Hong Kong.

I am afraid that owing to pressure of more urgent matters (including discussions with the Governor-designate of North Borneo) I have not been able to prepare the revised paper as quickly as I would have wished. I have, however, now completed it and sent it over to Mr. Kitson of the Foreign Office for his comments. A copy of my revised draft is at No.79 on this file and a flimsy of my letter to Mr. Kitson is at No.80.

In sending this file forward for information, I would invite attention to my minute of the 10th January (No.78) recording a discussion which I had with Mr. Kitson of the Foreign Office and the Secretary of State's note dated 13th January attached to No.77, asking that, in view of the constitutional difficulties in Hong Kong, the revised paper should be expedited.

You will see from the former document that Mr. Bevin had some talk with Mr. Byrnes in New York on the subject of China, as the result of which, Mr. Bevin was definitely against making any approach to the present Chinese Government on the subject of Hong Kong. It was evident from my conversation with Mr. Kitson that the Foreign Office took the view that it was not necessary to pursue the question of the future of Hong Kong any further at the moment. I, however, expressed the view in conversation with Mr. Kitson that we should wish the questions of reassuring public statement and f the line to be taken in the event of a Chinese approach on the subject of Hong Kong, to be submitted for Ministerial consideration as soon as possible, and I have confirmed this in my letter to Mr. Kitson, in which I have also expressed the hope that the revised paper will be considered by the Committee before the end of this month,

4.1.47.

1

2

cms

Ref.:

CO 537/1649

THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES

restrictions Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of National Archives' leaflet. Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the National Archives' terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright