-3-
00031
31
United States was a party,
which declaration has a binding force
on the Government of the Commonwealth of the Philippines the said
sequestration and subsequent disposition of plaintiff's aredit, made
by the Japanese invaders, could not and should not have effect or
validity; and that the said payments were made in Japanese military
currency, which was not the legal tender under the laws of the Common--
wealth of the Philippines.
The defendant maintains the affirmative, alleging that the
payments made by it to the Bank of Taiwan are valid and have extinguished:
its obligation to the plaintiff. Its view is predicated upon the
following reasons:
The occupying military authorities could validly compel the
defendant to pay to the enemy bank liquidator appointed by it, its in-
debtedness to the plaintiff, and such payment extinguished its obligation
The order of the Japanese military authority to pay is a consequence of
the right of all belligerents to take possession of all kinds of enemy
property, wherever found, and therefore the payment made by virtue of
said order is valid. The theory of the palintiff undermines the basis
of all law of the civilezed world. The payment was made by order of a
legitimate authority and therefore it discharged the defendant.
The
payment is not invalidated by the fact that it was made in Japanese
military notes. Neither does the declaration of the Governments of
some of the United Nations, invoked by the plaintiff bank, invalida te
said payment. The payment was made by the defendant under force and
duress and therefore produced the extinguishment of its obligation to-
wards the plaintiff. The defendant's negligence has contributed to the
possibility of the collection of the debt from the defendant by the
Japanese military authority. The plaintiff bank has a right to make
a claim against the Bank of Taiwan or the Japanese Government, and the
defendant does not have such right. The payment made to the Japanese
military government has been dechred valid by Act No. 727 of the Congress
of the Philippines.
The first point to consider is whether or not the sequestratio
and subsequent disposition by the Japanese invaders of the credit in
1
2
cms
Ref.:
CO 537/1374
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES
T
restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of National Archives' leaflet
Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the National Archives' terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.