-
2 -
Governor: I said earlier that what we are attempting to do over the coming weeks is to have a comprehensive review of all the rehabilitation measures that we take and that of course include looking at where we fund and where we put our own efforts. I don't think that there is a huge resources problem in the field of dealing with drug abuse, what I mean by that, is I think that the community wants us to put in as much money as it required, that the question which we have to look at quite properly as a government is how we can most intelligently use money. At a centre like this, at the moment, there are sorts of government help, though no direct subvention. When I say there are sorts of government help, first of all, the land is provided with a nominal rent. We help the Gospel-based organisations with charitable fund raising, and if they are charging board and lodging, then those who are having to pay that can get CSSA rates which of course, comes to the Gospel-based organisations themselves. So there is in a way some indirect financial help. But what we've got to look at is whether more is required in order, as the question has said, in order to maximise the facilities which are available. I should just add that I think the majority of the gospel based organisations haven't actually asked for direct government subventions, presumably because they may be a little concerned about the strings that tend to go with subventions from government. But I want to look at all these issues and I want to get the right answers as soon as possible. I repeat that as far as I am concerned, I don't start with any preconceptions, I don't start with any assumptions of what is best. I think we need to look at what appears to work in Hong Kong's circumstances and back whatever appears to work to the maximum extent possible.
Question: Well, my question is not about drugs, that's the JLG. The Chinese team leader, Mr Chen, how do you react (to what) Mr Chen has said about the permanent resident definition?
Governor: Well, it is for Mr Chen to explain the difference between an agreement and an understanding; those are questions of semantics. I don't think they are very helpful. What I know is that people in Hong Kong want us to clear up the questions of right of abode for after 1997 because one of the things that people are inevitably concerned about is how they can remain residents, how others who have left Hong Kong in the past can become permanent residents. They want, I think, to be confident about the future and about right of abode in the future. So, I very much hope that the discussions which have been taking place under the umbrella of the JLG will reach a satisfactory conclusion. And I don't know whether I disagree with Mr Chen Zuo'er in saying that. For me a satisfactory conclusion is one that allows people in Hong Kong to rest easy about the question of right of abode in the future.
Question: Mr Chen said that this problem won't be settled before 1997. Do you think that it will resolved?