MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 1991

4

AG OUTLINES MAJOR CHALLENGES FACING LAWYERS

MAJOR CHALLENGES FACING LAWYERS WOULD ARISE THROUGH THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THE COMPLETION OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN MARKET IN 1992 AND THE INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS ON TRADE IN SERVICES, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MR JEREMY MATHEWS, SAID TODAY (MONDAY).

MATHEWS SAID: SPEAKING AT THE OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR, MR "THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS NOT DESIGNED TO BRING ABOUT A REVOLUTION IN OUR LAWS AND OUR LEGAL SYSTEM. IT IS A RESTATEMENT IN LEGISLATIVE FORM OF THOSE CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS WHICH ARE ALREADY KNOWN TO US. »

AN EFFECTIVE "THE BILL SHOULD ENABLE THE INDIVIDUAL TO SEEK

THE THOSE RIGHTS.

LEGAL REMEDY IN OUR COURTS FOR VIOLATIONS OF

FAMILIAR ΤΟ EVERY LAWYER PRINCIPLES WHICH IT ENUNCIATES WILL BE

IF

PRINCIPLES THOSE TRAINED IN

LAW SYSTEM, EVEN PACKAGED IN A NOVEL FORM.'

COMMON THE

14

ARE

PROPOSED

IT WAS

THE LEGISLATIVE

THAT

THE BILL

WOULD

BE

CONSTITUTIONALLY

UNDERPINNED BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE LETTERS PATENT WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT

ENACTING FROM COUNCIL

VALID

LAWS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL RIGHTS WHICH WAS REPRODUCED IN THE BILL.

THAT WERE AND POLITICAL

"THIS MEANS THAT WHERE AN INDIVIDUAL CHALLENGES A NEW OF THE THE BASIS THAT THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT, BY REASON PATENT, HAVE THE POWER TO MAKE THAT LAW, THE COURTS WILL BE REVIEW IT.

LAW ON LETTERS ABLE ΤΟ

BILL,

OF

"AS FOR EXISTING LAWS, IF THEY ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE THEY ARE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF THAT INCONSISTENCY BY OPERATION

MR MATHEWS SAID. WELL-KNOWN RULES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION,

17

IF ENACTED IN WHO WERE

HE SAID IT WAS LIKELY THAT THE BILL OF RIGHTS, PRESENT FORM, WOULD HAVE ITS GREATEST IMPACT ON THOSE INVOLVED IN LITIGATION, PARTICULARLY CRIMINAL LITIGATION.

ITS

AND "VIOLATIONS OF THE BILL'S PROVISIONS MAY RESULT IN JUDGES

APPROPRIATE AND MAGISTRATES GRANTING SUCH RELIEF AS THEY CONSIDER JUST, WHICH IN THE CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL TRIALS MAY FOR EXAMPLE MEAN THE BILL'S ENACTMENT, MIGHT EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE WHICH, PRIOR TO THE OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN ADMITTED,

**

HE SAID.

BUT THE BILL SHOULD NOT BE IGNORED BY CIVIL PRACTITIONERS.

ΤΟ ADDRESSED SAID

PRIMARILY IT MATHEWS

WAS ALTHOUGH

IN HONG KONG. AUTHORITIES, THE BILL WOULD BIND EVERYONE

MR

PUBLIC

"FOR EXAMPLE LIMITATIONS ON PERSONAL FREEDOMS WHICH ARE IMPOSED BY EMPLOYERS WILL HAVE TO BE SHOWN TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE BILL.

BUSINESS CONCERNS

SEEK

"IN THIS CONTEXT, LEGAL ADVISERS TO LARGE MIGHT WELL BE ASKED TO CONSIDER WHETHER SERVICE AGREEMENTS WHICH TO IMPOSE LIMITATIONS ON THE CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES, SUCH AS THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION; THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM EXPRESSION AND OPINION; AND THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

OF

LIFE,

/"IT SHOULD

Share This Page