39
xem c
but it y have been omitted
by accident, and I enclose another
copy
Perhaps you
would have a
look at the band and third paragrables
of the Not. To meet the point
enelesure to that
tter.
If
Ma
para. 5(c) of the revised Schedule ( pora. 4 (c)
the old Schils). puhaps it will be suffeciimb to subllich "so far as it reales to "for relating to "
paragraph 6 of the present schedule
is to remain, we do not quite
understand the reason for
paragraph 4(a); the proviso
to be added by paragraph 6 should
apparently be "except in case of
As to the time pare. I km Noh, if
mutiny, no sentence.
.by the
Governor in addition to the
confirmation er otherwise required
by this Act" if this is the intention;
and paragraph 4(a) deleted.
5.
Would you reconsider the
schedule in the light of these comments?
from
A further despatch from the Governor
will then presumably be necessary.
Yours sincerely,