6
On
21463
C.R.
why you should intervene.
All that was, I consider,
cleared up by your letter of the 22nd January (No.42),
to which Lord Fitz Alan himself replied (No.45) that
he thought the explanation you had received from Hong
Kong was satisfactory.
But if a responsible person such as Lord
Fitz Alan writes to you and tells you that a League
working in Hong Kong intends to do something in China
which the Chinese Government have banned by law, even
though as seems likely Lord Fitz Alan's information is
based on some misunderstanding, I do not like the idea
of your replying that you will take no notice, and
I would suggest that we should proceed as Mr. Gent
suggested, i.e. reference to the 0.A.G. of Hong Kong.
and with an interim reply to Lord Fitz Alan, making it
clear, however, in both the despatch and the letter,
that the point upon which reference is made to the
0.A.G. is the allegation as to the intended activities
of the League in Southern China despite the Decree
issued by the Chinese Government.
aeel
5.7.32
sops agrees.
الجمعة معهم الله
а
6.2.37
معتقله
2. \\ is Visiont Litigilan
Shel
6.7.37
AIR MAIL
3
MAX Kay.
To try Kory-boy: (We 46 and
Al
-Cariss
16 JUL 1937
요기