3
? Reply
scheme has
has not
6 (1) that this
not be fut forward & Dv
Keffel for the reasa
quvve
ん
(3) but
that the projected host'say of H.K.
(me 53765/1/36) has bee flared on the book
for submisia.
P. Rages 25.9.
Weit be right to say that
I this application is
Concor
deferred
rathu than
repected for all time?
7 50
I think we st?
explain
in that sends
to the Sar.
M. Howard
Myint 2572
My feeling
in that the tweeting
was very doubtful about the propriety of pulling forward their application & that it was
rejected
rather than defermed
Свитись
2612